No. What I’m suggesting is that car companies are moving towards a subscription model for in-car media, similar to what’s already happening in video, music, and software. I’m just wondering how and if a Sirius/iHeart merger would fit into that strategy.Yes, I'm sure an acquisition rumor that started 3 days ago affected a decision GM announced 3 years ago.
No, the plan is to be able to feed you ads relevant to you and your marketing profiles and make a profit off it.So, car companies are eliminating HD radio and in some cases AM radio. GM is not supporting CarPlay. It sounds like the plan is to eventually eliminate all free in-car media in favor of a subscription model. Possibly related is the rumored SiriusXM acquisition of iHeart
That makes sense. However, I'm sure the car companies see it as more than that. GM's CarPlay replacement is part of OnStar. They were originally selling all the diagnostic data, information on your driving habits, etc that OnStar is collecting to third parties, but that has been restricted somewhat by the government. I assume that they're still hoping/planning on further monetizing the data they're collecting, and adding the streaming into the mix is just more data they can sell.No, the plan is to be able to feed you ads relevant to you and your marketing profiles and make a profit off it.
HD Radio is only 1 way, no way to insert ads to you alone.
CarPlay totally takes GM out of the equation. Making you sign into google and use app directly allows them to market things to you directly and know where and how long you are listening.
No. What I’m suggesting is that car companies are moving towards a subscription model for in-car media, similar to what’s already happening in video, music, and software. I’m just wondering how and if a Sirius/iHeart merger would fit into that strategy.
From GM’s perspective, if I’m listening to terrestrial radio, or streaming Spotify through CarPlay, they are missing out on revenue from that. They would rather I pay for my connectivity through an “OnStar Media” subscription or whatever.
My new to me 2023 Subaru Impreza has it as did my previous 2014 Subaru Impreza.HD disappeared from a lot of car radios due to COVID-era chip shortages, and afterwards they never saw a reason to re-implement a feature that nobody missed when it was gone.
My relative's 2024 Audi has HD Radio.My new to me 2023 Subaru Impreza has it as did my previous 2014 Subaru Impreza.
SiriusXM already pays to car manufacturers.If that idea is true (and I'm not saying it isn't), we should see stories in the business press (but not in the general press) about contracts that GM has made with satellite and Internet radio providers that allow them to take 10% of sales.
Better is to ask which car models do not have satellite preinstalled. Both of our cars, new this year and two years ago, have SiriusXM standard, but only have Apple CarPlay as to ancillary services.My relative's 2024 Audi has HD Radio.
SiriusXM already pays to car manufacturers.
"SiriusXM does not typically pay a flat fee per car to manufacturers; instead, they operate on a revenue-sharing model or pay subsidy fees for installation, often bundled into subscriber acquisition costs, which totaled $369 million in 2024. These costs include incentives to auto manufacturers for installing satellite radios and enabling trials. Revenue Sharing: SiriusXM pays automakers a portion of revenue generated from subscriptions initiated through their platforms." (Google AI)
The Audi has SiriusXM, but the free trial expired. It was a used car too so I don’t know how it came with a free trial, I thought those were just for new cars. It also has Apple CarPlay.Better is to ask which car models do not have satellite preinstalled. Both of our cars, new this year and two years ago, have SiriusXM standard, but only have Apple CarPlay as to ancillary services.
I have never checked whether either has HD.
It’s clunky because they want to drive demand for their “better” system.
Exactly. They want everything you do in the car to go through them (GM will have their own App Store). I can imagine in a few years, the only way to listen to radio in the car will be through a streaming app.They're not driving demand, but eliminating choice. It's how all the tech companies operate. Their system is always better.
Exactly. They want everything you do in the car to go through them (GM will have their own App Store). I can imagine in a few years, the only way to listen to radio in the car will be through a streaming app.
Projection was a little clunky on my last GM vehicle because it was before wireless projection became a thing. I had to plug in the USB cable and make sure the phone was unlocked to get Android Auto to come up. I've replaced it with a later model Ford truck, where Android Auto starts up automatically about 5 seconds after I start the vehicle. Then I can just pick an Amazon Music playlist and go.
“Barra said the feedback GM has received from customers is that switching between a car’s native infotainment system and smartphone projection is a clunky, distracting experience and that the automaker is focused on offering customers a great in-vehicle infotainment system with services that assist them and make their life better.”
It’s clunky because they want to drive demand for their “better” system.
People will adapt.It will make buying a used car VERY fashionable... Think of how confusing it would be for a 75 or 80-year-old driver.