That makes the most sense, or they have an easy bailout plan to call it Sunny.KSPF: "Spot Fm"?...
That makes the most sense, or they have an easy bailout plan to call it Sunny.KSPF: "Spot Fm"?...
Not that it makes any real difference, but it seems like Audacy could have thrown a few grand at the owners of the little graveyard AM in Idaho, and used the FM side of KSPT.That makes the most sense, or they have an easy bailout plan to call it Sunny.
Someone said earlier that those calls were available, (was it you?). They would make more sense than KSPF IMO....Not that it makes any real difference, but it seems like Audacy could have thrown a few grand at the owners of the little graveyard AM in Idaho, and used the FM side of KSPT.
It was not me, but a quick search of the call shows it to be currently in use by AM 1400 Sandpoint, Idaho. That particular station is off the air and, according to the STA, lost its tower site which is why the Silent Notification was filed. I don't know anything about the state of affairs up there in Sandpoint, but KSPT may very well become available in the short term. Looks like it has been silent for awhile now. May be a case of Audacy settling for KSPF until KSPT becomes available, without having to pay for the right to use the FM side of the calls. I'm not sure they even care, because if you look at the twin in Houston, they never bothered to change it at all, after "Hot Hits 95.7" (KKHH) became "95.7 The Spot" 6 years ago.Someone said earlier that those calls were available, (was it you?). They would make more sense than KSPF IMO....
The only reason they're doing it here is because of the EMF situation.It was not me, but a quick search of the call shows it to be currently in use by AM 1400 Sandpoint, Idaho. That particular station is off the air and, according to the STA, lost its tower site which is why the Silent Notification was filed. I don't know anything about the state of affairs up there in Sandpoint, but KSPT may very well become available in the short term. Looks like it has been silent for awhile now. May be a case of Audacy settling for KSPF until KSPT becomes available, without having to pay for the right to use the FM side of the calls. I'm not sure they even care, because if you look at the twin in Houston, they never bothered to change it at all, after "Hot Hits 95.7" (KKHH) became "95.7 The Spot" 6 years ago.
Exactly right. if Audacy really wanted to use KSPT they could get it. Instead, they have taken the somewhat similar KSPF, and even though the former set would fit better, or as you said make more sense, they likely won't obtain them, if at all, until they suddenly find that they are unused by anyone else.The only reason they're doing it here is because of the EMF situation.
I'm quite confident that all contingencies of the name usage were covered in the EMF deal.If the KLUV call had been transferred to EMF’s 100.3 in LA, would they be able to promote “KLUV 100.3” while still not using the actual “K-Love” branding for print, billboards, and other visual media?
This is not a question for a radio program but one for an IP lawyer, which I am not, but I would say this would likely not work due to KLUV being phonetically identical to K-Love.Question for radio pros and/or intellectual property experts: As reported, EMF cannot use the “K-Love” name in Los Angeles for any branding outside the actual on-air product, due to Univision controlling the trademark. If the KLUV call had been transferred to EMF’s 100.3 in LA, would they be able to promote “KLUV 100.3” while still not using the actual “K-Love” branding for print, billboards, and other visual media?
I figured that…but hypothetically could Univision really prevent EMF from using the FCC issued call as just letters (spoken as Kay-El-You-Vee and not the specific “K-Love“ name) for promotion/branding purposes in LA? Not a phonetic match.I'm quite confident that all contingencies of the name usage were covered in the EMF deal.
Ryan is absolutely right. You would need to consult an attorney to get the straight answer to a question like this, but I would assume that such a scenario was likely considered by Univision, when the deal was made to allow the branding of EMF's K-Love to exist in the market, and would be considered a breach of the original agreement. At the very least, it would be in extremely bad taste for EMF to push the envelope like that with the current L A. market agreement in place.I figured that…but hypothetically could Univision really prevent EMF from using the FCC issued call as just letters (spoken as Kay-El-You-Vee and not the specific “K-Love“ name) for promotion/branding purposes in LA? Not a phonetic match.
I would assume, like you, the calls are being parked until an acquisition within the Metroplex can take place.
To expand, it probably would be unlikely that they would reuse the KLUV calls in Dallas, as it would only cause confusion.I would not assume that. More than likely the calls were part of the service mark transaction, but not necessarily for the DFW market. Remember that "LUV" has a long history in the DFW market not only associated with "oldies", but with Southwest Airlines (it's there stock symbol) which is itself a playful reference to Dallas Love Field.
More than likely EMF just doesn't want confusion and doesn't want to give any other broadcaster any ideas (in or outside of North Texas) so they moved those calls far outside of the area, where they can control and keep them tied up.
Remember that "LUV" has a long history in the DFW market not only associated with "oldies", but with Southwest Airlines (it's there stock symbol) which is itself a playful reference to Dallas Love Field.
I understand the perspective you and Ryan have, but I have to disagree. I lean with Mediafrog's assessment on the calls merely being parked, because a typical Metroplex listener is not going to be confused when a set of calls suddenly reappear on the Metroplex dial. 98.7 wasn't K-L-U-V to your average listener, instead, it was always 98.7 "K-Luv". The confusion will happen the moment, if and when EMF purchases a 2nd DFW signal, that the K-Luv/K-Love branding is relaunched in the market.To expand, it probably would be unlikely that they would reuse the KLUV calls in Dallas, as it would only cause confusion
LUV is the airport code for Love Field. Prior to DFW, that was how you flew into Dallas. My dad always preferred Love Field to DFW because it was less busy and was easier to get around. He liked Southwest because it flew between Love and Hobby, which meant he didn’t have to deal with IAH either.
The airport code for Dallas Love is actually DAL, but based on this thread maybe they have a branding problemAs stated, the airport code for Dallas Love Field is LUV
You are right, and a laughable gaffe on my part. It's the stock symbol for Southwest Airlines, not the code for their hub. I'm embarrassed! 😳 🤦♂️The airport code for Dallas Love is actually DAL, but based on this thread maybe they have a branding problem![]()