7
700WLW said:
Or you can — as smart stations' Internet promos say — “Listen online, at work or at home.”
Or you can listen on any of the acres of wireless devices on display at CES. If you're in any of 300 U.S. cities already lit up or soon to turn on WiMax, it'll be no less available to mobile users than FCC-licensed stations.
With WiMax, anyone with files on a server is tantamount to a radio or TV station. Before you scoff that listeners prefer professionally produced content, know this: CNN.com delivers 50 million downloads a month. YouTube will deliver 100 million today
Mike Walker said:I especially like the next to last paragraph of the article...
"What is astonishingly clear to a radio person at CES is how opportune, not threatening, new tech is. Let's harness the potential of HD-R by avoiding radio business-as-usual on HD2."
Taking things in context. What a concept!
Mike Walker said:Here's a better one. Why take 700 seriously when he alternates between "I love radio! I listen all the time. That oldies show on WABC is wonderful". and "Why waste time with local radio?"
Most of what's on internet radio IS LOCAL RADIO. Most of the highest rated online streams are RADIO STATIONS! Here's a better complexity...why go through the frustrations and limitations of a point to single-point network like an i.p. connection over the internet, with limitations in coverage and bandwidth, not to mention cost(as in recurring monthly fee!), when you can just get the freakin' digital signal FOR FREE over the air, whether you pay a bundle for wireless internet access or not?
Mike Walker said:Neither internet radio, nor any other i.p. technology where bandwidth costs skyrocket as listenership increases, will EVER supplant "point to multipoint" technologies such as terrestrial and satellite, where costs DECREASE (per-capita) as audience increases.
With internet radio, it's actually possible for a company to become bankrupt by success. "Hey yout think we're losing money at 10,000 streams, wait till you see how much we can lose with 200,000!"
Most of the highest rated online streams are RADIO STATIONS! (See#1)
Here's a better complexity...why go through the frustrations and limitations of a point to single-point network like an i.p. connection over the internet, with limitations in coverage and bandwidth, not to mention cost(as in recurring monthly fee!), when you can just get the freakin' digital signal FOR FREE over the air, whether you pay a bundle for wireless internet access or not? (See #2)
With internet radio, it's actually possible for a company to become bankrupt by success. "Hey yout think we're losing money at 10,000 streams, wait till you see how much we can lose with 200,000!"
Mike Walker said:Most of what's on internet radio IS LOCAL RADIO.
700WLW said:With internet radio, it's actually possible for a company to become bankrupt by success. "Hey yout think we're losing money at 10,000 streams, wait till you see how much we can lose with 200,000!"
Prove it !![]()
are, once more, debunked.Most of the highest rated online streams are RADIO STATIONS!
http://www.fmqb.com/article.asp?id=355943Out of the 3000 12+ people surveyed, 21 percent had listened to an online simulcast of an AM or FM station, up from 16 percent in last year's study. Bridge also found that the most listened-to Internet radio networks were AOL Music, Yahoo! Music, Live365 and Clear Channel Online.