• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

HD Recievers for Component Systems

I find the continuous loud, CD quality, lifelike surf sounds on all the HD radio "stations between the stations" from around the country to be quite relaxing, and it's TOTALLY FREE with NO COMMERCIALS! The surf sounds are so wideband and high fidelity that I also use them for testing the bandwidth of my stereo system and speakers.

My dentist uses the HD radio surf sound channels in his practice to mask the drilling noises.

Contrary to what you may have been told, you don't even need an HD radio to hear it. I'm sure the price for HD radios will be coming way down soon, so I'm holding off purchasing my first one until they show up at my local dollar store some time later this week.
 
Savage said:
Ain't it the truth, Carmine5??

Hey, Clouseau! I even found an HD-2 that programs nothing but dead air!! :D

It's genius. (Some contributors here would post "genious.") Think of the ASCAP/BMI savings!! ;D

Still trying to find those HD-2/3 stations that programs HOT AIR that Clouseau, Mike Walker, RFBurns, and some of the other HD proponents listen to... cause they sure do enjoy it so much! ::)
 
Savage said:
Hey, Clouseau! I even found an HD-2 that programs nothing but dead air!! :D

It's genius. (Some contributors here would post "genious.") Think of the ASCAP/BMI savings!!

If it's the same western New York HD-2 I'm thinking of, it has been broken for months; I first noticed this last August. There are a few little bits of audio down there, but you have to crank the receiver volume all the way up to hear them. (Thank goodness for the low noise floor of digital radio!)

For a few weeks in December, the right channel rose about 10 dB, but then I heard some horrible ground-loop buzz in the background. But two weeks ago, the levels were back down in the dump. But the FM main channel sounds fine.

Problem is, if this station were to attract an actual HD-2 audience, they would then have to deal with incessant coverage complaints from listeners (half the service population lives between the 60 and 54 dBu contours), so I question whether this "negligence" might actually be intentional. And if digital power were increased 10 dB, Canada would probably object to the increase in first-adjacent interference from this "specially negotiated short-spaced facility." Makes me wonder if a contractual obligation is the only reason the HD exciter is still plugged in.
 
radiopilot said:
Savage said:
Ain't it the truth, Carmine5??

Hey, Clouseau! I even found an HD-2 that programs nothing but dead air!! :D

It's genius. (Some contributors here would post "genious.") Think of the ASCAP/BMI savings!! ;D

Still trying to find those HD-2/3 stations that programs HOT AIR that Clouseau, Mike Walker, RFBurns, and some of the other HD proponents listen to... cause they sure do enjoy it so much! ::)

It's easy to find that hot air, just tune 10 KHz up or down from your favorite AM IBOCer, you'll hear nothing but hot air and in CD quality sound! This can be received for up to one thousand miles! Yes and those nattering nabobs of negativism said it couldn't be done, AM IBOC DX is here!!! Now the carrier only goes about 10-20 miles but those hot air sidebands? Easily half way across the country, what a system! If you're in Podunk ME some night and need a hot air recharge to post some stuff like 10 million HD receivers are set to be shipped to Antarctica for the Eskimos so the hot air can warm up their igloos, just tune to 700, 720 KHz, 1040, 1020, 1000 or 650, 670, 1090, 1070 etc, and you be fully charged by the morning ready to take on the world! That band is full of hot air!! Whoooosshhh!!!!!!! Ah..... refreshing isn't it.
 
On a completely different note, I was totally blown away by this article. It has nothing to do with HD Radio but has every to do with what makes radio special.

It's the story of one woman and her campaign to get her favorite, recently fired DJ's back on the air. It shows that live and local does matter to listeners and that they do develop a relationship with local air personalities.

To me the article highlights what is really important for those who own and program radio stations. In the end, the technology is inconsequential.

http://blogs.tampabay.com/media/2009/01/rally-to-protes.html

C5
 
In a similar vein - in case there is any visitor here who tends to think that the newest technology (in this case, HD) is invariably an improvement over what has gone before...

Don't know if you guys ever saw this, but Jay Leno recently staged a competition between the "fastest cellphone text messagers in the country" and ham operators using the 173-year old communications tech, good old CW (Morse code.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhsSgcsTMd4

Before watching the clip, you probably already guessed which transmission mode was fastest.

There is a lesson here for those who chant the dogma that "radio MUST go digital.....digital MUST supplant analog....go digital or be left behind in the dumpster of outdated technology." (Or sentiments to that effect.)
 
I was not being sarcastic. When the technology works, I will give due credit. Of course nothing will improve the quality of programming, nor will it improve the sound if HD-2+ are used. If only an HD-1 is used, the compression artifacts are minimal.

The test I ran was at mile marker 55 on highway 75 North of Van Alstyne. That put it about 70 miles from the Dallas / Ft. Worth stations. To make the test as scientific as possible, I used a dipole located one meter off of the ground, outside. I was behind a slight hill, which I am sure would make things worse, but my friends live where they live. I had no other choice. The Sangean HDT-1X locked on all DFW HD stations.

The other listener that reports semi-reliable HD reception on Houston stations at 84 miles has their dipole at the ceiling line indoors. But this tells me the threshold for full Class C stations is somewhere between 70 and 84 miles. Well beyond the farthest suburbs - so this is a very robust system as it is. Those reporting problems are in areas that I suspect also have analog reception dropouts, hilly terrain, less power, shorter sticks. Still, HD reception should scale with those conditions. If someone gets spotty analog reception, they will probably not get reliable HD reception.

My work has a very good spectrum analyzer. Just for fun, I put it on a cart next to a window one day. I adjusted it to get a nice spectrum of a local HD station, and set a reference level. I then wheeled it away from the window. Our floor tiles are 18 inch square, so I had a good yardstick. I got 10 dB drop every 6 to 8 feet, which tells me the 10 dB HD power increase might net one more layer of cubicles inside buildings. NOT a very significant improvement.
 
rbruce, not to speak for everyone else, but I wasn't (and I don't think others were) taking liberties with your initial post. We were all just having a little fun. Hope you weren't offended. Your contributions here are indeed rational and well-reasoned.

Your latest reply does point out a couple of the unavoidable problems HD has. Those are:

It appears that the great selling points of HD are (a) improved sound quality and (b) the capacity to add subchannels for additional programming outlets. The problem is that those two advantages are mutually exclusive. If you add the subs, the main-channel quality sinks below that generally found with properly processed analog FM. If you take advantage of the best quality HD affords, you can't use the subchannels.

A corollary to the above: the subchannels offer distinctly inferior sound quality compared with FM analog, which from a marketing perspective impairs the overall desired perception that HD Radio is a real improvement.

The second major problem is implicit in your comment to the effect that "if someone gets spotty analog reception, they will probably not get reliable HD reception." That's another way of saying that HD offers few real advantages over analog because it fails to solve real and perceived shortcomings inherent in the status quo.

If HD made FM reception more reliable, offered real answers to AM with all of its historic shortcomings (as Freebird has noted, dramatic differences between day and night coverage or daytime-only operation) or offered sonic advantages which are dramatically evident to the nontechnically inclined, it would have a shot.
But the promises of HD are vague and highly negotiable at best, in the real world. It's just not a good idea for the radio industry to indulge in hyperbole and ethically-questionable technical "improvements" at a time when we should be closely guarding our credibility with the public.
 
Rbruce,

I too wasn't trying to discredit your observations. They are remarkable. I've found that the vast majority of the "Sucky Range" complaints are from people who are fringe and don't even know it. I also don't normally get that FM range. Then again, I live in a market of C1's not C's We have a single C-0, but it has an HAAT of 303, so it's only 10 feet taller than a C-1. I have gotten 50 miles in the car no problem coming south from Houston. And I've gotten Houston here in Corpus Christi, but it's Coastal Ducting. It's fairly regular, but not normal. I always try and err on the conservative side when it comes to range. Hence my post saying I thought your range numbers were a little on the high side.

I salute you for being honest. Sometimes it's difficult to read above the emotion on this board. Many here are not particularly honest, and routinely impune those who try to be honest. I regret labeling your post as sarcasm. Knowing who posted it, I should have known better.

Clouseau
 
clouseau said:
I salute you for being honest. Sometimes it's difficult to read above the emotion on this board. Many here are not particularly honest, and routinely impune those who try to be honest.
Clouseau

Yes, Clouseau I have often thought that many of the IBOC boosters on this board were full of it, glad you also see it and point out the same thing.
And RBruce I knew you were serious as I had seen you post the same distances several times. I find them to be out of the ordinary however but you are probably correct the better the analog reception on FM the better the IBOC reception. I do get much better analog reception here in MA than I do IBOC however. WGBH is as solid as a rock here close to Worcester and their IBOC does not always come in, same with other Boston FM's. There was or is a guy on You Tube several months ago who posted a video of a 300 mile FM IBOC reception from somewhere out midwest. I wrote to him as I suspected he was exaggerating a little bit but it turned out he was living on the 9th floor af a high rise on a hill and had a special antenna (forgot what) and was facing the transmitting antennas. I and other DXers have also often noticed that radio travels much farther on roadways, it seems to propagate better down the road so to speak.
 
KB1OKL said:
Yes, Clouseau I have often thought that many of the IBOC boosters on this board were full of it, glad you also see it and point out the same thing.

NO, KB. I pointed out that "Many here are not particularly honest..." I made no assertion as to either side of the discussion or BOTH.

Yet your quote above claims it's "the same thing." Thanks for pointing out EXACTLY what I was referring to with regards to honesty.

Clouseau
 
Savage said:
rbruce, not to speak for everyone else, but I wasn't (and I don't think others were) taking liberties with your initial post. We were all just having a little fun. Hope you weren't offended. Your contributions here are indeed rational and well-reasoned.

Oh no - I wasn't offended by anybody's post. I took it in the spirit. I merely wanted to point out that the measurement data is what it is - and it does not support the industry's claim that a 10 dB power increase is warranted.

Another aspect of coverage is that many listeners in smaller metro areas (geographically) are too near airports. Aircraft reflection is immediate death to HD lock as listeners in the DFW metroplex have noted, some no more than 10 miles from the full class C sticks. Van Alstyne is not on the approach path to DFW airport, and 70 mile reception was easy. I suspect that may be a hidden coverage problem that was not thought through when the system was proposed. No 10 dB power increase will help - the signal variations are several decades, not one decade.

I have never been a proponent of AM HD, the coverage is lousy, robustness not there, and sound quality is poor, nowhere near FM quality. I get listener fatigue in minutes even when I am fully locked on a strong station, the artifacts are annoying. I have contrasted coverage tests on C-Quam vs. HD, there is no comparison. 290 miles in perfect stereo for C-Quam on a 5 kW regional, vs. 20 or 30 miles once the same station converted to HD. Since the DFW metroplex is 80 miles wide and 60 miles NS in places, it stands to reason C-Quam is the better choice to cover it. There have been documented cases of 160 mile AM HD reception from 50 kW stations such as WBAP (which has turned off HD for quite a while now), and some documented nighttime cases. But the AM system is obviously not going to fly, and the sidebands are horrific. One of my projects will be to document 1000 mile sideband hash in the daytime if I get the chance to go out west this summer. I know I wasn't imagining it, I just need to do it again with an ordinary car radio and put the video on Youtube or something. Unless somebody else can beat me to it --- It gets really obvious which station is the offending station when there aren't that many on the air around the country, and sideband pairs from places like Chicago start showing up in the right places on the dial in remote places in New Mexico.

As far as FM HD, I know KKBQ has HD, and I measure my distance from it at about 280 miles. If a local AM talker hadn't just started jamming the frequency with their garbage, it was only a matter of time until I got an HD lock on KKBQ, the analog signal was so good. I may be moving, perhaps I can get a better selection of medium to deep fringe targets from my new location - wherever I end up. Suffice it to say I've seen documented reports of 100 to 120 regular HD reception from other parts of the country, on stations that are not full class C. How far does HD go reliably on a full class C with a good antenna? I don't know yet. I would guess 150 or so, perhaps 200. Definitely not as far as analog that can go 300 for a class C with a good antenna. A lot depends on first adjacents - which tend to get prevalent that far out. My guess is that the HD folks don't care at all out in the fringes like that, but 10 dB sideband power increase might help in the deep fringes 200 to 300 miles out. That is extreme DX, and there probably isn't but a handful of people around the country that are in the position of doing it on a regular basis. Dropouts are inevitable at those distances even in analog.
 
rbrucecarter5 said:
My work has a very good spectrum analyzer. Just for fun, I put it on a cart next to a window one day. I adjusted it to get a nice spectrum of a local HD station, and set a reference level. I then wheeled it away from the window. Our floor tiles are 18 inch square, so I had a good yardstick. I got 10 dB drop every 6 to 8 feet, which tells me the 10 dB HD power increase might net one more layer of cubicles inside buildings. NOT a very significant improvement.

I think you would agree that a more effective way to gain commercial building penetration would be to add low-power "gap-filler" transmitters near business districts, rather than taking the brute-force approach of raising power at the main transmitter site. Unfortunately, as long as we're stuck with a hybrid digital system, we can't take this approach on a large scale, as there would be problems in protecting the FM analog signal from destructive multipath interference.

An interesting case study proving the effectiveness of filler transmitters:

The BBC struggled for years with multipath and building penetration problems in parts of London which are shadowed from the regional FM transmitter site in Wrotham, about 20 miles southeast of the city center. ERP of the Wrotham stations was increased to 250 kW, but the improvement was unsatisfactory. BBC's engineers then came up with the idea of adding 4 kW filler transmitters at the Crystal Palace tower, much closer to the city with a clear shot across the Thames into the congested business district. To minimize interference and stereo "birdies", they offset the booster frequencies 304 kHz from the corresponding Wrotham frequencies using phase locking, as 304 is the 16th harmonic of the 19 kHz stereo pilot. (FM receivers sold in Europe tune in 100 kHz steps, so this seemingly strange offset wasn't an issue as it would be in North America. Further, most Euro car radios have RDS and will retune automatically to the highest quality simulcast signal.)

This experiment was a major success; I've listened to this system on several trips to London and it works quite well. Judging from the S-meter on a Sony ICF-2010, the difference in signal strength reaching my Bayswater hotel room was dramatic. Here's the BBC paper describing what was done; you can also search "Crystal Palace FM filler" in Google for more info:

http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/reports/1996-06.pdf

The FM allocation plan here in the US doesn't favor this kind of approach -- but after HD is declared dead, the next attempt at digital radio should be designed to accommodate synchronized boosters and single-frequency networks.
 
clouseau said:
KB1OKL said:
Yes, Clouseau I have often thought that many of the IBOC boosters on this board were full of it, glad you also see it and point out the same thing.

NO, KB. I pointed out that "Many here are not particularly honest..." I made no assertion as to either side of the discussion or BOTH.

Yet your quote above claims it's "the same thing." Thanks for pointing out EXACTLY what I was referring to with regards to honesty.

Clouseau

Perhaps Clouseau you might want to look into buying or stealing a sense of humor someplace, no wonder you write 1000 word refutations all the time. jeez, lighten up.
 
rbrucecarter5 said:
Aircraft reflection is immediate death to HD lock as listeners in the DFW metroplex have noted, some no more than 10 miles from the full class C sticks.

That independent confirmation should kill the "HD radio is immune from multipath" false claims the HD cartel and promoters make about their defective, unpopular, unnecessary, expensive, failed HD radio high school science experiment. It's time for radio broadcasting to admit to the HD radio disaster, turn the HD hiss off and move on.
 
KB1OKL said:
Perhaps Clouseau you might want to look into buying or stealing a sense of humor someplace, no wonder you write 1000 word refutations all the time. jeez, lighten up.

Oh, NOW I get it. The problem isn't that the post is a distortion or outright lie, the problem is that those reading it don't have a sense of humor.

I guess i'll have to get one. Where's that bookmark for Ebay. :)

Clouseau
 
clouseau said:
KB1OKL said:
Perhaps Clouseau you might want to look into buying or stealing a sense of humor someplace, no wonder you write 1000 word refutations all the time. jeez, lighten up.

Oh, NOW I get it. The problem isn't that the post is a distortion or outright lie, the problem is that those reading it don't have a sense of humor.

I guess i'll have to get one. Where's that bookmark for Ebay. :)

Clouseau


Here you go Inspector: ;)


http://cgi.ebay.com/SUBLIMINAL-IMPR...304376263&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=66:4

http://shop.ebay.com/?_from=R40&_trksid=m38.l1313&_nkw=sense+of+humor&_sacat=See-All-Categories
 
Well I don't care for the Jensen model. I find the Jensen model on par with the Coby models. Cheaply made and poor reception.

The only good HD Radio that cost $100 is the HD 100. The reception is great. I can pick my local low power FM community radio station that broadcast on 102.1. The HD 100 dipole antenna can be removed and I can use a better FM antenna same thing with the AM antenna I can use an Terk AM Advantage antenna both amplified and passive. same thing with the FM antenna's.

With the Jensen model I saw the dipole antenna was hardwire in the unit.
 
SUPERCASTER said:
rbrucecarter5 said:
Aircraft reflection is immediate death to HD lock as listeners in the DFW metroplex have noted, some no more than 10 miles from the full class C sticks.

That independent confirmation should kill the "HD radio is immune from multipath" false claims the HD cartel and promoters make...

You don't hear multipath in HD. Period. I would ask where you heard it is "Immune", but I know better. Program is either as transmittted, or it's not there.

about their defective, unpopular, unnecessary, expensive, failed HD radio high school science experiment.

Your forgot "Titanic 2000 of Broadcasting". :)

Clouseau
 
clouseau said:
I would ask where you heard it is "Immune", but I know better.

Yes, you should know better, but pretend you don't.
It's right here:

Ever wished you could get the same quality of sound from your radio as you do from your CD? Or that your radio signal didn’t fade out just when you wanted to listen to the game? Now you can. Get the kind of sound that was previously reserved for your HDTV, CD system or MP3 player. Get it on your radio. And get it for free!

CD-quality sound
Crystal-clear reception
No station drop-off

No static, hiss or audio distortion

Link:
http://www.hdradio.com/how_does_hd_digital_radio_sound.php

and

3-3
Is immune to multipath interference;

Link:
http://www.hdradio.com/the_buzz.php?thebuzz=87

HD radio promoters; always in denial. They have nothing else.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom