K.M. Richards
Program Director, The Eighties Channel™
I am clearly looking at the wrong source.
I recognize from the display format what your source was, Chico, and you are correct in that conclusion.
I am clearly looking at the wrong source.
KJZZ-HD2 in Phoenix started to pop up with a 0.3 once they removed the nighttime jazz from the main station. But, I'm under the impression that they don't separately encode the broadcast station and the stream like some stations do. You ever wonder why you see the streaming breakout for Audacy stations but not for iHeart? I'm under the impression that only select station groups/owners split OTA ratings from streaming.Those shares are for their respective streams.. so once again, not actual listening to an HD channel but rather their internet streams.
View attachment 7888
That sounds like a challenge from a processing perspective. How do they handle the processing for the AM signal? Is it final peak limiting and clipping only, allowing everything else done by the FM processing, like AGC and multiband compression/limiting, to simply "play through?"KRKE operates exactly that way in Albuqerque; K229CL is fed via STL from the studios to Sandia Crest and the AM 1100 transmitter actually receives 93.7 off-air for its programming, sunrise to sunset. Perfectly legal.
Not at all! I understand very clearly who it is really for, and why everyone would want to appear as #5 or #6 via combined shares, rather than as 11th or 22nd, as David illustrated for example.With all due respect, @yeoldeschool, your line of reasoning almost reads like there is a presumption that the ratings are taken for the direct benefit of the listeners.
Subscribers don't automatically get that information, it is an extra report they have to pay extra for, and most don't ever bother to pay for it unless they need to... like if they are evaluating whether or not to keep stations in a simulcast.However, now that it's been explained that subscribing stations do get that information, my curiosity is satisfied. I simply didn't know that they made the separate "radio" vs. "internet" data public, but kept the separate "radio type X" vs. "radio type Y" data private for paying subscribers only.
KRKE operates exactly that way in Albuqerque; K229CL is fed via STL from the studios to Sandia Crest and the AM 1100 transmitter actually receives 93.7 off-air for its programming, sunrise to sunset. Perfectly legal.
That sounds like a challenge from a processing perspective. How do they handle the processing for the AM signal? Is it final peak limiting and clipping only, allowing everything else done by the FM processing, like AGC and multiband compression/limiting, to simply "play through?"
That sort of begs the question: Are streams pulling any numbers?I don't listen to FM radio at all locally. I stream music in my car or stream my favorite stations that aren't even in my current location.
Yes, radio streams show up more often and with greater numbers than HD channels, though they still are not a major factor and the streams that show are generally those with greater TSL (like Sports stations), where one panelist listening to a stream for an extended time can generate enough listening to register.Are streams pulling any numbers?
Huff brings up a great point: the part of radio listening that advertisers look at is "how many are listening when my ad might run?" They do not usually, or even "ever", look at the number of total listeners a station has.Yes, radio streams show up more often and with greater numbers than HD channels, though they still are not a major factor and the streams that show are generally those with greater TSL (like Sports stations), where one panelist listening to a stream for an extended time can generate enough listening to register.
Huff explained this a week or so ago here but I still don't understand why some operators choose to combine OTA and streaming shares in total line reporting and others separate. If subscribers can see the breakdown anyway I would think all operators would want total line reporting. Even if a stream takes just 0.5 or 0.8 of the monthly share that can still displace a station a spot or even two. And I'm sure there are folks that don't scroll down to the bottom to look at the bottom level shares where streams are often found.You ever wonder why you see the streaming breakout for Audacy stations but not for iHeart? I'm under the impression that only select station groups/owners split OTA ratings from streaming.
Has anyone here ever seen someone listening to an hd 2,3 or 4?
Personally, I've seen it only once. In a Lyft. The driver was listening to an HD 2 station. Honestly, I was surprised to see/hear that.
Generally, those streams that are listed separately are translators that do not 100% duplicate the OTA signal. Nielsen will not allow single line reporting in these cases?Huff explained this a week or so ago here but I still don't understand why some operators choose to combine OTA and streaming shares in total line reporting and others separate.
Advertisers, for whom we buy the ratings, want the audience data about who will hear their spots. If the stream has separate spots, it can not be qualified for SLR.If subscribers can see the breakdown anyway I would think all operators would want total line reporting. Even if a stream takes just 0.5 or 0.8 of the monthly share that can still displace a station a spot or even two. And I'm sure there are folks that don't scroll down to the bottom to look at the bottom level shares where streams are often found.
The math depends on the size of the sample and the variables like age, gender and ethnicity. So in each market and for each subset the number is slightly different.I also have always wondered how many quarter hour detections a station needs to get to even register a 0.1 on a monthly. And if even one single detection gets a station a 0.1 on a weekly or daily. I have always (possibly incorrectly) thought enough 'regular listeners' are streaming out of market stations enough where an assortment of out of market stations would show up in certain monthlies with the same frequency of the 0.2 and 0.3 numbers an HD2/HD3 gets.
Here in Orlando all of the major iHeart stations (WXXL, WMGF, WTKS et al.) have single line reporting. The major Cox stations (WMMO, WDBO, WWKA et al.) separate OTA and streaming. Audacy separates WOMX and WJMH but WOCL is single line reporting.Generally, those streams that are listed separately are translators that do not 100% duplicate the OTA signal. Nielsen will not allow single line reporting in these cases?
Not once, at least through happenstance. The only person I knew who listened to an HD2 was a relative whose dashboard I disassembled to retrofit with an aftermarket HD radio. And that was only as a surprise gift, after I noted her increasing disappointment over her favorite station's ever-evolving playlist (she had no clue it offered an HD2 with its old format).Has anyone here ever seen someone listening to an hd 2,3 or 4?
When the IBOC radios first came out, some home stereos and component radios had HD on them like Sangean, Denon, Yamaha, etc. Then the cars started getting 'em on many models.We have had this same conversation more times than I can count, and the answers are always the same:
1. When you see an HD subchannel with high numbers, you're seeing listening happening on translators as well as the HD2/3.
2. HD radios are not scarce. It's 2024. They're standard equipment in many new car brands and by most estimates there's now at least 1 in 4 cars on the road (maybe even 1 in 3) equipped with HD.
Is there anything else new to add to this same old same old?
Who buys "home stereos" or component audio systems today?When the IBOC radios first came out, some home stereos and component radios had HD on them like Sangean, Denon, Yamaha, etc. Then the cars started getting 'em on many models.
Some of us do. Not as many as in the old days. There's a Reddit group devoted to quality hifi gear and more then you think have nice set-ups.Who buys "home stereos" or component audio systems today?
People with taste, of course.Who buys "home stereos" or component audio systems today?
Might I trouble you for the link?Some of us do. Not as many as in the old days. There's a Reddit group devoted to quality hifi gear and more then you think have nice set-ups.
People with taste, of course.
Which more and more these days naturally means the minority.
Might I trouble you for the link?