K.M. Richards
Program Director, The Eighties Channel™
I don't mind banner ads integrated into web pages. I only engage my ad blocker on sites where the ad pops up over what I am trying to or launches a video that can't be turned off (or muted, at the very least), or otherwise directly interferes with my viewing the content that I came there for.
But if they want to put a banner ad -- static or animated -- between the headline and the article, or in the navigation bar to the side of the article, or even (as is the case with a lot of news sites now) "sponsored" article links, it's fine by me.
The reality is that these sites expect to get paid subscriptions from people wanting to turn off the ads, and they then create pop-ups of their own about detecting the ad blocker, as if you're going to be shamed into subscribing. What they are conveniently ignorant of is that no one is going to pay to read the one article in five years on your site that interests them at this moment in time; the ones that offer five free articles before subscribing seem to be the only ones that understand this.
None of which solves the problem the OP is having here.
But if they want to put a banner ad -- static or animated -- between the headline and the article, or in the navigation bar to the side of the article, or even (as is the case with a lot of news sites now) "sponsored" article links, it's fine by me.
The reality is that these sites expect to get paid subscriptions from people wanting to turn off the ads, and they then create pop-ups of their own about detecting the ad blocker, as if you're going to be shamed into subscribing. What they are conveniently ignorant of is that no one is going to pay to read the one article in five years on your site that interests them at this moment in time; the ones that offer five free articles before subscribing seem to be the only ones that understand this.
None of which solves the problem the OP is having here.
