• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

If you were gonna change the format of . . .

Because Beasley also owns the classic rocker in town. So it's a narrow lane.

Comparing this to Dallas, my take is that iHeart has a smaller potential audience (in terms of percentage) base to market to, which is why I said earlier that splitting this audience doesn't work for them. What we don't know is how the syndicating of WRIF's morning show helps the finances of their respective stations. iHeart could potentially put Woody on in Dallas with a localized music list, but Woody hasn't been doing well in markets outside of LA.

Fair points.

KVIL's success suggests to me KEGL could've repositioned itself as a music intensive station outside of mornings and fared decently. KEGL missed that boat.

I am unsure how KZPS's numbers compare now to when The Eagle was still around. It certainly is possible the removal of active rock at 97.1 has given 92.5 a bit of a lift.

There seem to be exceptionally few markets where iHM offers both classic rock and active rock on full power analog FM signals. San Diego is the only one that comes to mind. They used to own both WEBN and WOFX in Cincinnati, but they sold the latter to Cumulus years ago.
 
KVIL's success suggests to me KEGL could've repositioned itself as a music intensive station outside of mornings and fared decently. KEGL missed that boat.

Maybe. iHeart likes having hosted dayparts (although they may be piped in from other places). Audacy seems content to air music & imaging. As I said, they might have tried to set up a battle similar to what they have in LA with KYSR and KROQ, piping in Woody, but the question is can Dallas support that many rock stations? We already see what happened to CHR at 93.3. The radio demo is getting older, and these stations are looking to do the best with what they have.
 
This hasn't been mentioned but...

Maybe iHeart and EMF could work a deal for EMF to purchase and put K-Love there since 97.1 is a 100,000 watt signal. Mostly likely won't happen, but that is a suggestion.
 
How is that an improvement?
As far fetched of an idea as E-Cam's is, the sheer signal coverage of "K-Love" that would result from this, available on a single frequency, and being able to keep it tuned from one end of I-45 in Houston to the northern terminus in Dallas and beyond, would be quite impressive.
 
As far fetched of an idea as E-Cam's is, the sheer signal coverage of "K-Love" that would result from this, available on a single frequency, and being able to keep it tuned from one end of I-45 in Houston to the northern terminus in Dallas and beyond, would be quite impressive.

I mean how is this an improvement for anyone other than EMF. iHeart isn't in sell-mode like the other radio companies.

If this was 93.3, it might have been an option.
 
How do you arrive at that conclusion? New York can't support anything more than a classic rock station (plus a few lowly rated college stations that play rock). The minority population of Dallas is a higher percentage than New York. Dallas is doing better now than New York. Modern rock is struggling in markets that don't have rock heritage. Trying to build rock radio heritage is a very long process because the audience has already found what it wants on other platforms. Building a "good morning show" is not as easy as it sounds, as Kevin Kline demonstrates at KROQ. His biggest problem was replacing Kevin & Bean.

First, comparing New York to Dallas - which had The Eagle with decades of legendary personalities and heritage doesn't mean anything to this conversation. (Neither do any of the other posts.)

The post is: If you were going to change formats of the current KEGL format, what would you change it to. Maybe 2 people answered. The rest is just bullsh*t hyperbole on arbitrary content.

The minority population means nothing in the conversation about formats that are non Hispanic. We're not talking about that. Having said that, hmmm . . . lets look at the numbers though. In the top 15 stations, there's ONE Hispanic radio station. So . . . get back to me on that argument.

Rock, done properly in this market would be in the top 10 . . . with a good morning show. Thanks for the news that building a successful morning show is hard. The rock format in general has to be a format that regains it's loyalty. It has to constantly be IN the culture. Look at The Ticket. Everything they do is centered around it and it's audience's culture. EVERYTHING. Rock stations now just throw on some 80's and 90's music, have a voice tracked morning show, and don't give a sh*t beyond that - as a whole. I was offered a job in the last year to voice track the morning show in Detroit - AND do 4 other mid size markets - for part time wages. I couldn't believe my ears. Listen to WQLZ in Springfield, IL. That is a station in a small market that sounds like a top 10 market station, because they're so unbelievably ingratiated to their audience . . . and their audience gives that back. There is some fantastic music from the last 10 years in this format, but it never gets played because programmers are afraid and terrified to play something from the last 2 decades. Playing Motley Crue, Poison, Led Zepplin, and Aerosmith with a Godsmack record every 5 hours doesn't make you a rock station. It makes you an oldies station. A 50 year old man has heard all of that 5 million times. KZPS has it's ratings because of the upper end of the demo. KVIL sound just OKAY to me. It's a middle of the road, predictable alt station. I've said this until I'm blue in the face, but rock done correctly here could win.

I will repeat, THE EAGLE out billed what the Freak is billing now. Imagine if it had been programmed correctly.
 
First, comparing New York to Dallas - which had The Eagle with decades of legendary personalities and heritage doesn't mean anything to this conversation. (Neither do any of the other posts.)

Just want to point out that New York also has decades of legendary rock personalities, going back to WNEW and WPLJ. Most of them aged with the rock audience and are still bringing their decades of knowledge and experience to WAXQ. Carol Miller was just inducted into the Radio Hall of Fame. They're still working, going on almost 50 years in the same city. That's heritage, and that's why WAXQ is Top 5, and even doing well in younger demos.

But to the topic, as I've said before my take is that iHeart wants a talk-based station in its Dallas cluster. They have the music bases covered. If they were going to do a music format, they'd do country. I'm sure they'd like to get Bobby Bones cleared in Dallas. But they've likely decided that Dallas can't support three country stations. Crying over spilt milk doesn't address the topic either. If you dig back a year on this board, you'll find posts from me describing how this station could have combined the talk they're doing with some rock music. Primarily on weekends. But instead they hired a PD who's mainly a talk PD. Woulda coulda shoulda. That's where we are.
 
I listen to WRIF a lot. I live six miles from their TX site.

While KXTE definitely plays some active rock titles most alt stations refuse to touch (both gold and currents), I think WRIF is more amenable to giving nu metal and classic metal artists airplay. Songs from such artists comprise a higher percentage of WRIF's playlist.

Alt 105.1 in Louisville has pivoted its playlist to a KPNT-like model in recent months and has seen its paltry 0.7 or 0.8 share double to a 1.5 or 1.6. (Small class A signal that probably struggles indoors in the middle of town.)
I think what’s emerging as the “formula” for successful Alternative in this day and age is immersing itself in the community, playing a balanced mix of veteran and fresh artists, keeping at least 20 currents in the mix, and being amenable to crossovers from Active Rock. And, perhaps most importantly, time to let it grow, especially if it lacks a legacy.

DJs seem to be an additional benefit but not absolutely necessary as KVIL doing well demonstrates. KPNT absolutely destroys everyone in the morning in its market so that shows the boon of strong DJing, especially in the morning. So, while it’s not a necessity, it definitely can help significantly.
 
Last edited:
I hate to add to pointless speculation, but I'm noticing "The Eagle" on 97.1's RDS tonight. I don't have an HD radio in my car so I know it's not the HD2. Programming is the same, and they say "The Freak" on air. Just wondering why the RDS changed.
 
I hate to add to pointless speculation, but I'm noticing "The Eagle" on 97.1's RDS tonight. I don't have an HD radio in my car so I know it's not the HD2. Programming is the same, and they say "The Freak" on air. Just wondering why the RDS changed.
I drove in Dallas last night. This is true.
 
I hate to add to pointless speculation, but I'm noticing "The Eagle" on 97.1's RDS tonight.

Is that a change from what it had been showing, or at one time did it say The Freak? Because truthfully, in the branding world, The Eagle is a stronger brand. But it has no relation to format. Around the country, you have country stations calling themselves The Eagle. So even if they change their brand, it doesn't signal a format change.
 
Is that a change from what it had been showing, or at one time did it say The Freak? Because truthfully, in the branding world, The Eagle is a stronger brand. But it has no relation to format. Around the country, you have country stations calling themselves The Eagle. So even if they change their brand, it doesn't signal a format change.
From the other times I drove around in Dallas, it’s said The Freak. I need help understanding everything else you just said.
 
Keep in mind for many years this station had an annual Freaker's Ball. BEFORE it became The Freak.

They have said that the original name was supposed to be 97.1 The Freq (as in frequency), but they thought the spelling would cause confusion, so they went with “Freak”.
I hate to add to pointless speculation, but I'm noticing "The Eagle" on 97.1's RDS tonight.
I’m wondering if it could be old RDS equipment that’s hooked up to their auxiliary transmitter. I don’t think the aux had RDS last time, but I can’t exactly remember. I noticed 101.1 WRR was on their auxiliary transmitter last night and WRR and KEGL are on the same tower.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom