Considering Disney bought Lucasfilm for $4B, they still have roughly $3.8B still to make. The Mandalorian spin off was/is a huge streaming success. And with good reason. It's a great show. But the spin-offs involving only 8-10 30-45min episodes are wearing out the fans. Hard core's are still there, but they aren't around in numbers to see the ROI Disney is looking for.And Star Wars---after 46 years, the wonder is that there's any life left in the franchise.
They bought them in 2012, and have since made back the $4B and then some. The three major movies alone that have been released since 2012 have made over 4 billion in profit, and that doesn't count the "non-main" movies, the licensing, the merch, the comics, and Indiana Jones. I think Disney did just fine with the purchase, but I'm not sure it has a lot of life left. Then again, May 4th is now basically a Star Wars holiday, so.....Considering Disney bought Lucasfilm for $4B, they still have roughly $3.8B still to make. The Mandalorian spin off was/is a huge streaming success. And with good reason. It's a great show. But the spin-offs involving only 8-10 30-45min episodes are wearing out the fans. Hard core's are still there, but they aren't around in numbers to see the ROI Disney is looking for.
The issue is that the base is getting smaller and the production costs much higher. It's likely that the current labor negotiations will end up causing many films with a more niche appeal to never get a green light.There’s more life in Star Wars than perhaps people around for the early days can conceive. It’s not going to be the blockbusters of old, but there are new fans being minted and various ways to extend the franchise.
No, that is $4 billion in box office. Half of that goes to the theaters, and then come the production costs and promotion costs.They bought them in 2012, and have since made back the $4B and then some. The three major movies alone that have been released since 2012 have made over 4 billion in profit,
Holy Cow, Abraham! Where do you live? $17 a pop for a matinee when the national average ticket price is $11.25 is highway robbery!Just booked three tickets to a movie, $17 each before fees. For a matinee. I know inflation is a thing, really, but that’s just robbery.
Oh, God—I did a hundred million instead of a billion.Off by an order of magnitude, Mike. 11.75 x 8,500,000 = 99,875,000. Ticket price needs to be $117.50 or number of tix sold 85 million to reach $1B.
Had it been filmed in B&W it could have passed for a 1930's serial.
Fair point. I didn't notice that in the chart, but it actually enhances the point I was making which was how few movies have ever cracked $1B---and knowing that the chart is not strictly ticket sales emphasized how big a mountain that is to climb.I might be mistaken (like that ever happens, lol!), but the term Box Office refers specifically to tickets sold for theatrical release, whereas Gross includes license income from streaming, premium cable, OTA TV, ancillary income like I.P. licensing (e.g., toys), soundtrack sales, etc. Bottom line verses top line. The link you provided is worldwide gross, so apples-verses-apple pie.
But if I watch something I like on Amazon I'll probably buy the DVD
All of the remaining big chains left have sidecars to create duopolies and skirt ownership limits. Even Scripps created a sidecar when they bought up Ion. Plus Sinclair and Gray have a history of finagling licenses and spectrum so they can divest the least amount of stations (Gray has been more artful with this in North Dakota and Nebraska).Unless the FCC lifts the national ownership caps, who would be a buyer for just a piece of the station group right now? The companies that are most aggressive in that space right now - Nexstar, Sinclair, Gray - are all at or near the 39 percent cap already and couldn't add any big market, unless it's as a duopoly for Nexstar.
And then there's Byron Allen, but would he have the cash?
If ABC were to go, it would have to be all in one piece. A buyer could then spin off little stuff like Fresno down the road.
Plus the UHF Discount makes a total mockery of the 39% cap.
Why has no one gotten the message that it should be a VHF discount now, since VHF is harder to watch with an antenna outside the city?Scripps and Nexstar both cover nearly 70% of the US thanks to the "UHF discount" and sidecar shell corporations. It's ridiculous.
The discount was reinstated in 2017 for only one reason: so Sinclair Broadcast Group could buy Tribune Media. It was nothing more than a cynical case of political favoritism by Ajit Pai.Why has no one gotten the message that it should be a VHF discount now, since VHF is harder to watch with an antenna outside the city?