Wrong. The only people involved are the ones who gave a campaign or PAC money of their own free will.
One of the joys of living in a swing state, unfortunately. We're subjected to more of Kari Lake now than when she was still anchoring the news. And it's only going to get worse!
Yep.
Oh Lord. "I won I won I won I won I won I won I won". Great grift if you can get it.
Unfortunately, for the advertisers, it is easy to ignore online commercials.
In particular, my eye doctor has had it with big pharma ads for the latest eye medications. People come in and request them. As a professional, he has to take extra time to explain why he doesn't think the "new" medication is right for a patient's situation.
People with Fixed Wireless (5G) home internet have the same problem. And, the number of people who use this is growing due to its value proposition.
I have a condition that requires eye treatments. Believe me, the medication is whatever the doctor can get approved by my insurance, and time between treatments is up to him, not the pharmaceutical company
It has been on during the past several months. However, it's pointless. They start it at 9 Eastern when the kids should be in bed.
When I was still listening to WERT radio online, ads for and against Vance were constantly airing.
Absolutely, my condition requires treatments as well. When my doctor find something that works, he likes to stick with it as long as possible. The danger is always that, if you switch and something goes wrong, you may never get back to the vision you had before. But my doctor has generally been proactive with me -- still trying to find something that will work long term.
My retina guy is one of the best in the business. I had a tiny vessel expolose in one eye, causing swelling, blood and gunk inside my eye. That caused a big loss of vision. After almost a year it's not all back (may never be) but much better than it was. I trust him all the way.
They’re required to take political ads from legally qualified candidates:
We'd all be better off if political advertising were totally prohibited. These ads do absolutely nothing to bring any sort of useful information to the voting public but they encourage the political parties to beg/borrow/steal vast amounts of monies to spend on misleading commercials.
They've been pretty much worthless since the beginning of the Republic. Attack ads have been the American Way since Day One. But they are protected speech under the First Amendment, and we just have to deal with them.
