Re: If speaking my opinion is anger..then let it be anger...
> > Was having some fun with the hannity situation....
>
> Hate is so funny..
I guess you have decided to take up Michelle's new talent...reading minds...good job Scooby...
>
> > this coming from you who argued with me about Rush's
> parody's.
>
> I only argued that asking him to announce that an obvious
> parody is a parody is absurdly funny. Like demanding that
> Jay Leno announce that his jokes are jokes.
I guess humor is not humor when it touches something on the right wing ...amazing how that works...whatever....
>
> > .....guess liberals can't have a sense of humor....
>
> A sense of humor or embarrassment at having been so candid
> about your anger?
hmmm wonder what im thinking now....hmmmm lets see if Scooby knows...LOL..ill let him tell me since he knows whats on my mind better than I do...heres a scooby snack for ya..
>
> > Regarding Michelle Malkin, I read (unfortunately) In
> Defense of Internment and > i also read Invasion.... have
> you? Im betting you don't have the slightest
> > idea about this woman.
>
> Uh oh. You busted me. Nope I haven't read her books. I
> dispute your conclusion that it means that I "don't have the
> slightest idea about this woman." If not having read her
> books disqualifies me from commenting about her, that means
> you don't qualify to comment on Hannity or... could it be?
> You read Hannity's books? Nah.. couldn't be. Which,
> following your logic, means you don't have "the slightest
> idea about this man."
Nahhh, I don't think anyone would follow your thought there. Malkin has no public forum like Hannity who has a show on that big box called a
"TeeVee" and the little box called a "RayDeeO". Unfortunately, he speaks enough to where most people can get an idea of what he believes. Fortunately, its enough that I don't have to read any of his books, but Malkin, well you have do something the right wing does so little of....reading. If you look at her blog, you get that she has little to offer... but you wouldn't know where one could get the idea that she might not like history unless you read her books. You also get a sense of racism. Thats why people read to get a sense of what a person has to say. I know these are funny words to you but oh well, you can't help everyone...
>
> > I also noticied that you would rather defend Malkin. This
> woman is also a
> > clairvoyant
>
> She is a clairvoyant? You say I would rather defend Malkin,
> yet I wrote nothing in her defense. I only observed that way
> the liberal "self-hater" epithet is used only against
> non-liberal minorities and against non-liberal gays is sad.
Hmmm, nahh ill pass on this. The right has never said "self-hating" before... ..yeah...NOT....LOL....and I don't remember me mentioning any one's gayness...but you can if you must....LOL
>
> > You certainly have the right to pick and choose what you
> defend..but
> > methinks you might have not picked wisely. (IMHO)
>
> Methinks you thinks too much and listens too little.
Again, have to pass on that one...yawn....you know nothing about Malkin so no need to go further. The real issue is the dirty job she and the others i mentioned did on Cindy Sheehan...i mention Sheehan and you talk about my quip on Malkin. I humored you a little bit Scooby...but time to get back to Reality...Malkin/Hannity/etc were wrong to attack this woman for doing absolutely what she has a right to do, speak out against the war...and those who claim to support the troops attack her because she's not happy with the ever-changing reasons Bush uses to justify the war.... your trying to direct the point to Malkin is kind of like Bush witnessing the the attack the WTC and his reaction is to attack IRAQ...and you think I listen too little...man life on the right sure is odd....time to move on....lata
>
<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">
Edited by doc9464 on 08/12/05 05:19 PM.</FONT></P>
