rbrucecarter5 said:
OK - that's enough. Can you possibly get more insulting?!
I wasn't being insulting, at all. I was simply being descriptive, and you've chosen to take it as being insulting....which I find quite enlightening. In addition, you don't appear to have answered a single question or challenge in the post, showing that you're here to make speeches but not engage in conversation.
Your attitude on the Religious and Contemporary Christian board is decided UN-CHRISTLIKE.
Really? How 'bout Christ's actions with the moneychangers' perverting what the place was for for their own possible gain? (You know, just like
you are doing
here.) Was
Christ "UN-CHRISTLIKE?" He did the same thing....with an
even stronger tone!
You have a fascinating perspective, Bruce.
I can see right away that your focus is not reaching the lost through Christian radio...
Thank you for once again confirming what I wrote above -- "Some of you even appear to honestly believe that the pros sit around and scheme how to screw you or your favorite target group, and others go as far as to label pros "money-grubbers" who care nothing about the spiritual aspects."
I'll repeat what I wrote then -- "Well, you're wrong. Absolutely, completely, totally, 100% wrong."
...the people who need Christ the most - the ones you describe in the second paragraph - ARE the focus of Christian radio, and if not, they ought to be.
Bruce, don't just make these accusations. Please make the case
for programming a radio station for a group of tourists who may or may not show up for
five days a year....! Your target audience will never establish residence, never help provide a cent of revenue, never know you exist, and never want to listen to you. Ok........go!
If Christian radio is to have the slightest hope of being a ministry as well as a business, it needs to stop feeding the fat, baby sheep and start reaching out to the lost at the risk of being irrelevant.
Christian radio has become more accessible, palatable, and engaging than ever. It is doing
exactly what you're asking for, but, since it's not
your exact taste, you either
can't or
refuse to see it.
You know what - I've had a belly full of "self examination" posts on this board.
Well, three things:
1. I don't exactly understand what that's supposed to mean.
2. Even though you've had a "belly full" ???, you haven't considered any of them. Repeating something I said only a short time earlier, the same message keeps coming to you over and over, and you're ignoring it.
3. You've never actually done that self-examination that should be done with each such rejection. Again, Bruce, you keep getting the same message from everyone you've been going to...look, maybe it
is you.
When I have been at a Christian station where the husband of the daughter of the owner goes and gets a case of beer, where one of the engineers and junior programmers put a hole in the bathroom door trying to get a girl, where one of the preachers on the air is an abusive husband, where another preacher smokes so excessively it makes you sick to smell his clothes - and so forth and so on - there is NOT a lot of SELF examination necessary. The problem is the other programmers, a lack of genuine salvation and repentance on their part, and an attitude of "let's take the checks from preachers and the hell with the listeners and ratings we're making a living".
I'm sorry, Bruce, but
I'm going to need the names and phone numbers of every single person you've just mentioned so I can check it out for myself! After all,
exactly quoting you from elsewhere, "I want FACTS FROM ORIGINAL SOURCES - not your word for it."
What does it sound like having your exact words and demands repeated back to you?
That's why reflection and self-examination is so important.
By the way, I don't really want anybody's name or number. (It's really weird that I felt like I
had to say that.)
Based on what objective data?
It isn't getting anybody saved,...
Based on what objective data?
...the soccer mom demographic doesn't really exist,...
Sure it does!
But what's the point of the statement? I can tell you're making an assumption, but are you even right?
...the stations make a go of it based on a set of church members that are too scared to listen to secular because it might be compromising with the world.
Bruce, you may not know this, but Arbitron provides a table of data showing each station all the other stations it shares listeners/listening with. Never in my life have I seen a station that has zeroes in all the other stations' columns. The truth is Christian stations generally share with
all other stations that appeal to listeners of similar demographic and psychographic characteristics.
As a matter of fact, I believe there's a stat floating around that says something like 40-60% of Christian AC listeners aren't Christians and never go to church.
As far as the site - it was my understanding it was for industry pros as well as interested amateurs and radio fans.
Oh, it absolutely is! You're absolutely welcome. But look at the ads -- if we pros exit, and that
has been the result of the kind of posting you're doing, those ads are worthless to those paying the freight.
The industry pros who are on here are to be applauded, they are listening to radio fans and listeners, and might actually be able to improve their stations as a result.
No, that's false. See, people who somehow find boards like this and then go posting a whole bunch of stuff when radio's not even their field
are not normal or typical. Because "broadcasting" is just that, we don't pay attention to people who are way out of the norm. There are
no radio pros here who are changing
anything as a result of what's said by "enthusiasts."
If you don't like me,...I certainly harbor no ill will towards you, you obviously do towards me, you've made your statement that you totally disrespect me and don't like me....
Wait...this is weird. Just like another poster, you seem to think this is about "liking," "disliking," "hating," "agreeing with," or "not agreeing with" you. That just couldn't be farther from the truth.
I'll leave your disgustingly hateful post....
It wasn't "hateful," at all. There was a hint of frustration, but, otherwise, it contained no emotion, whatsoever.
...in tact without reporting it...

Ah....
you've been the one!
...it doesn't affect me or my walk with Christ, and I'll let the whole world see your rant so they will know you as a fool.
Bruce, there's no doubt that eyes are being opened.
And let me point out once again that, in this attack
of me, you didn't answer
my post in any way.