• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

It's almost that time again: Election Night 2012!!!!!

All this week, the network newscasts have been (almost) wall-to-wall Superstorm Sandy, but not for long as the attention will shift on Monday to the final few hours of the 2012 election.

NBC will once again transform 30 Rock into Democracy Plaza with Brian Williams, Tom Brokaw, and company at Studio 8G; ABC will once again rent out Times Square with Diane Sawyer and George Stephanopoulos holding fort, but CBS? Nothing yet, though I'm thinking they'll use either their main news studio or CBS This Morning's; Scott Pelley and Bob Schieffer will be in it for the long haul.

And on cable, there's good ol' CNN with Wolf Blitzer and Anderson Cooper; the whole world will be tuning in as well.

Election Night is also considered to be the TV news industry's Super Bowl, as the networks will go all out with as much bells and whistles they can muster to keep us glued (i.e., Tim Russert's "magic slate", CNN's holographic technology, Dan Rather and his "Rather-isms"). This time around, coverage will be not just on television and online, but smartphones and tablets as well to make sure we don't want to miss a single second.

In Britain, they'll be pulling in an all-nighter as there'll be coverage on BBC, ITV, and Sky News. As for Canada? CBC will probably be the only ones interested while on CTV and Global, regular programming with occasional updates (CTV News Channel will probably have full-blown coverage).

NBC will no doubt have the #1 and best network coverage, so I'll be watching them, CBS (hopefully for any "Pelley-isms"), and CNN. ABC I think will probably be too full of themselves, so that's a pass.

The anchors and everybody else involved will be in rehearsals all weekend to make sure everything goes smoothly as planned once the clock hits 7:00 Tuesday night. And yes, they'll all be working till the crack of dawn...or until Obama reaches 270 before polls close in the West, whichever comes first.
 
Can't wait until 8PM PST/11PM EST for the results on November 6th. Finally, I don't have to see or hear political ads anymore.
 
I for one am personally going to miss Keith Olbermann on election night.

Whenever things went badly for the Democrats his meltdowns were so entertaining!
 
I was listening to a radio station in NM, and they played the SAME political ad for the same candidate, TWICE in a row! :mad:

We'll probably watch MSNBC, maybe CNN as well.

-crainbebo
 
I don't know which broadcaster's programming about the election to watch after having seen many broadcasters attempt to deceive the public about the race for the presidency of the United States by focusing on two candidates rather than trying to report on as many candidates as possible.
 
I hope that whoever wins in the presidential election that it is with enough of a margin that it won't turn into a fiasco like it was in 2000. I don't think it will be a landslide in either direction, but I hope there is enough of a margin where there won't be any doubt who won so that one side can't claim the other stole the election. But then someone will likely do that even in a landslide. ::)
 
e-dawg said:
Can't wait until 8PM PST/11PM EST for the results on November 6th. Finally, I don't have to see or hear political ads anymore.

Amen to that! I'm also so sick of the reptetitiousness of the 24 hour political news cycle that I've imposed my own news blackout on myself -especially the constant polling..."Romney's ahead by 2 pts with a 3 point margin of error,"....now it's Obama by 2 with a 3 point margin or error." It's all pointless up to the day of the election, and it's nerve-wracking, if you can who wins, which I do.

I'll no doubt be on the edge of my seat on Tuesday watching the coverage...but even that will probably be pointless for the Presidential race. I doubt we'll know the outcome until well into Wednesday - perhaps much longer if the race is as close as it seems, and we have a repeat of 2000.
 
My wife and I are working the polls. Except for our little corner of the election, we will be totally out of the loop. Since we are on MST we won't know anything until we leave, and by then it will most likely be all over.
 
Lkeller said:
Amen to that! I'm also so sick of the reptetitiousness of the 24 hour political news cycle that I've imposed my own news blackout on myself -especially the constant polling..."Romney's ahead by 2 pts with a 3 point margin of error,"....now it's Obama by 2 with a 3 point margin or error." It's all pointless up to the day of the election, and it's nerve-wracking, if you can who wins, which I do.

I've been doing the news blackout thing too except for some local news this week. Although, my main reason was to get away from the Hurricane Sandy coverage than the election. After experiencing those April 27 tornadoes from last year, I really didn't want to see wall-to-wall news coverage of Hurricane Sandy's destruction.

I agree with anotherguy about the margin being enough for whoever wins. America really doesn't need to go through another fiasco like 2000 at this point.
 
The Question is what will MSNBC and Fox News have in the playbook after the election is over if either Candidate wins.
 
FreddyE1977 said:
I for one am personally going to miss Keith Olbermann on election night.

Whenever things went badly for the Democrats his meltdowns were so entertaining!

As were his gloats when things went the other way.
 
crainbebo said:
I was listening to a radio station in NM, and they played the SAME political ad for the same candidate, TWICE in a row! :mad:
-crainbebo

We are not a swing or battleground state so all our political ads have been for state and local pols. I have noticed in the past week a commercial block will have something like 5-6 ads in a row and the same ad can be featured every other ad.

As most of the ads seem to be coming from third parties I am assuming lots of money is changing hands.

The TV stations must be loving this revenue. It has cut my TV watching down to about 1 hour of live TV per day and everything else is DVR'd.
 
Mario-500 said:
I don't know which broadcaster's programming about the election to watch after having seen many broadcasters attempt to deceive the public about the race for the presidency of the United States by focusing on two candidates rather than trying to report on as many candidates as possible.

What point would their be in wasting time with candidates who have no chance of getting even a fractional number of votes? As soon as the networks opened up media coverage to third parties there would be an avalanche of kooks signing up for their 15 minutes of fame ala Nader.
 
johnnya2k6 said:
In Britain, they'll be pulling in an all-nighter as there'll be coverage on BBC, ITV, and Sky News. As for Canada? CBC will probably be the only ones interested while on CTV and Global, regular programming with occasional updates (CTV News Channel will probably have full-blown coverage).

CBC will be running its regular programming on Tuesday night. CBC News Network will probably have full-blown coverage though.

Honestly, I don't care if the major Canadian networks cover the election. With the American networks readily available in Canada, the Canadian networks are right to be employing a counter-programming strategy. Personally I'll be watching coverage, but I bet there's a lot of people outside the United States that don't care one iota about the election. I know up until the last election, I avoided American political coverage as much as possible.
 
e-dawg said:
Can't wait until 8PM PST/11PM EST for the results on November 6th. Finally, I don't have to see or hear political ads anymore.

The Political ads will not dissapear after the election if you watch the cable news. The political ads you will see after the election are the attack pundits on MSNBC and Fox News.
 
landtuna said:
Mario-500 said:
I don't know which broadcaster's programming about the election to watch after having seen many broadcasters attempt to deceive the public about the race for the presidency of the United States by focusing on two candidates rather than trying to report on as many candidates as possible.

What point would their be in wasting time with candidates who have no chance of getting even a fractional number of votes?  As soon as the networks opened up media coverage to third parties there would be an avalanche of kooks signing up for their 15 minutes of fame ala [Ralph] Nader.

Other candidates besides Barack Obama and Willard Romney would have better chances of having significant vote totals on Election Day if more news agencies were to treat them fairly. Treating all of the candidates fairly would ensure folks that any citizen of the United States aged 35 years or more can become president of the United States.
 
Mario-500 said:
Other candidates besides Barack Obama and Willard Romney would have better chances of having significant vote totals on Election Day if more news agencies were to treat them fairly. Treating all of the candidates fairly would ensure folks that any citizen of the United States aged 35 years or more can become president of the United States.

Actually, that's a very scary thought since there are VERY few people who are qualified to be president - and we haven't elected one in a number of decades. No reason to believe this year will be any different.

However, I must correct a small mistake......any citizen only includes those actually born here. Thankfully, that means my wife and two girls can't qualify (and no, they don't read this board).

Technically there is no reason that anyone who qualifies cannot run right now. Gen up the big bucks and get your face on the telly and whack away. Whether the general public or the media giants will pay you any attention probably depend upon your acceptance to the voting public.
 
I see one of these things panning out on election day:

1. Romney will win by a landslide (Dick Morris' and my prediction)
2. Romney will win by a slight margin (Everyone else's prediction)
3. Obama will win by a slight margin (Everyone else's prediction)

Since this election is still too close to call, it's hard to tell which one will end up winning.

R.D.P. <><

P.S. Now for those who think Obama will win by a landslide, I just don't see it happening.
 
recto101 said:
The Question is what will MSNBC and Fox News have in the playbook after the election is over if either Candidate wins.

Obama win:
Fox News: same as 2008
MSNBC: same as 2008

Romney win:
Fox News: same as 2000
MSNBC: format change, CNBC News
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom