Actually, I'm not sure. I heard she was let go with her husband while she was in the hospital. Then again, isn't illegal to fire someone while they are on maternity leave?
columbusradiogirl said:Actually, I'm not sure. I heard she was let go with her husband while she was in the hospital. Then again, isn't illegal to fire someone while they are on maternity leave?
gabigley1 said:http://ohiomajorityradio.com/
The petition supporting progressive radio in Central Ohio has been closed, having garnered 2,799 signatures in 29 days.
gabigley1 said:http://ohiomajorityradio.com/
Our group, OhioMajorityRadio, is approaching Central Ohio radio broadcasters to propose that they include Progressive Talk in their programming. We would like to show local broadcasters that there is support for Progressive Talk in the Central Ohio business community.
Dirty_Harry said:gabigley1 said:http://ohiomajorityradio.com/
The petition supporting progressive radio in Central Ohio has been closed, having garnered 2,799 signatures in 29 days.
2,799 signatures out of 1.8 million people! WOW! That's pretty impressive!
well, it is quite possible that some of those signatures came from out of the area and from people who never actually listened to the station.Nu_Roo_2 said:Dirty_Harry said:gabigley1 said:http://ohiomajorityradio.com/
The petition supporting progressive radio in Central Ohio has been closed, having garnered 2,799 signatures in 29 days.
2,799 signatures out of 1.8 million people! WOW! That's pretty impressive!
I know you're being sarcastic, but a comparison to the Columbus metro population of 1.8 million people doesn't make any sense. A lot of those people can't even pick up the station. And a lot of them can't even talk yet. The weekly cume for TPG was maybe 400,000 at best. If you assume 20% of these were loyal P1's, you've got about 80,000 people. 2800 people "signed," which is about 3.5%. This % is probably understated a bit, since I'm sure not all of the 130,000 were aware of the petition. Considering typical response rates to various types of research, promotion, and "calls to action," the 2800 was actually somewhat higher than I expected.
DaytonRadio said:well, it is quite possible that some of those signatures came from out of the area and from people who never actually listened to the station.Nu_Roo_2 said:Dirty_Harry said:gabigley1 said:http://ohiomajorityradio.com/
The petition supporting progressive radio in Central Ohio has been closed, having garnered 2,799 signatures in 29 days.
2,799 signatures out of 1.8 million people! WOW! That's pretty impressive!
I know you're being sarcastic, but a comparison to the Columbus metro population of 1.8 million people doesn't make any sense. A lot of those people can't even pick up the station. And a lot of them can't even talk yet. The weekly cume for TPG was maybe 400,000 at best. If you assume 20% of these were loyal P1's, you've got about 80,000 people. 2800 people "signed," which is about 3.5%. This % is probably understated a bit, since I'm sure not all of the 130,000 were aware of the petition. Considering typical response rates to various types of research, promotion, and "calls to action," the 2800 was actually somewhat higher than I expected.
Radioboy989 said:gabigley1 said:http://ohiomajorityradio.com/
Our group, OhioMajorityRadio, is approaching Central Ohio radio broadcasters to propose that they include Progressive Talk in their programming. We would like to show local broadcasters that there is support for Progressive Talk in the Central Ohio business community.
I mean this with all due respect and I absolutely don't mean to start a fight or be insulting.
It seems to me that IF there was support for this format to any great extent, and if that support came from a substantial group of people with the financial ability and desire to support advertisers on a station carrying this format, the money grubbing corporations that compose the radio ownership pool would be broadcasting this format. Show me an audience study that says 80% of all 25-54 year old females love to dance the polka and I will put a stopwatch on ClearChannel for the launch of the Bobby Vinton radio network. It's all about the money.
I have no problem with your want for a particular kind of entertainment, but the words "progressive" and "majority" and the claims of some immense listener pool that is starving for left-wing, liberal talk radio just don't coincide with what I see and hear in this market. You seem to be operating on the "If you build it, they will come" philosophy. If that thought process worked in every situation, there would be Burger King drive thrus across India. The fact is, there is a less than minimal chance that a hamburger joint would work in a place where the cow is sacred. There is not an audience for the product.
I would also suggest, again with all due respect that you (meaing those with your political leaning) consider positioning your efforts in a more forthright way. I don't see the format as progressing past anything, I don't believe your organization composes a majority of anything.
Not only - again, just my opinion- would you be more accurate, but frankly I think you may be more successful at rallying your troops if you were called "Ohio Liberal Radio" or something more pointed.
We disagree politically, but I welcome diverse opinions, an argumentative government and airwaves filled with a rainbow of ideas. I wish you luck in your quest.
gabigley1 said:Radioboy989 said:gabigley1 said:http://ohiomajorityradio.com/
Our group, OhioMajorityRadio, is approaching Central Ohio radio broadcasters to propose that they include Progressive Talk in their programming. We would like to show local broadcasters that there is support for Progressive Talk in the Central Ohio business community.
I mean this with all due respect and I absolutely don't mean to start a fight or be insulting.
It seems to me that IF there was support for this format to any great extent, and if that support came from a substantial group of people with the financial ability and desire to support advertisers on a station carrying this format, the money grubbing corporations that compose the radio ownership pool would be broadcasting this format. Show me an audience study that says 80% of all 25-54 year old females love to dance the polka and I will put a stopwatch on ClearChannel for the launch of the Bobby Vinton radio network. It's all about the money.
I have no problem with your want for a particular kind of entertainment, but the words "progressive" and "majority" and the claims of some immense listener pool that is starving for left-wing, liberal talk radio just don't coincide with what I see and hear in this market. You seem to be operating on the "If you build it, they will come" philosophy. If that thought process worked in every situation, there would be Burger King drive thrus across India. The fact is, there is a less than minimal chance that a hamburger joint would work in a place where the cow is sacred. There is not an audience for the product.
I would also suggest, again with all due respect that you (meaing those with your political leaning) consider positioning your efforts in a more forthright way. I don't see the format as progressing past anything, I don't believe your organization composes a majority of anything.
Not only - again, just my opinion- would you be more accurate, but frankly I think you may be more successful at rallying your troops if you were called "Ohio Liberal Radio" or something more pointed.
We disagree politically, but I welcome diverse opinions, an argumentative government and airwaves filled with a rainbow of ideas. I wish you luck in your quest.
I quoted what was said on the OHIOMAJORITY website as an update for this thread. I'm in no way affiliated with the OhioMajorityRadio.com website nor do I necessary share their views.
gabigley1 said:The latest ratings, Spring 2007, have 1230-AM down to a 0.4 12+ share, down from a 1.4 12+ from a year ago.