AAR - Stealing From Poor Kids to Finance O'Franken and His Ilk...
Sorry Archer, but claiming the source is simply another vast right-wing conspiracy and then using a far left bomb-throwing blog like Kos is simply not going to cut it. As the facts have become more known, AAR has gone into hiding while claiming they are the ones who have been fleeced (the gall!), and the out-of-business non-profit group that has made the "loans" to them is referring all inquiries to a tony Manhattan PR firm.
I do a LOT of work with small not-for profit organizations including boys and girls clubs, and I can assure you that none of them has a PR firm as this organization does so they will not have to answer tough questions. They actually use the money for the kids instead of funding start-up political talk networks.
As for the MSM, they will be picking it up too, and spinning just as kos is doing. It has already run on Fox and CNN, so the floodgates will be open soon. I have been monitoring KTLK (to the extent that I can stand to do so) and have not heard so much as a peep about the story. Nothing on the website either. And don't look for Jessie and Al to start marching the streets on this issue, even though money has been taken from disenfranchised black youth to prop up AAR - Their organizations actually have links to both the Boys and Girls Club and AAR. We have definitely not seen the end of this story.
> > (Or
> > hasn't anyone heard about the fact that AAR is getting
> > financed from underpriveliged boys and girls in New York
> > City? Oh yeah, if all you're reading is the LA Times and
> the
> > other MSM, you won't hear about it)
>
>
> There's a bit more to the story than that.
>
>
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/7/30/124315/828 has
> it all in one place, with links to various sources.
>
> But you won't hear it in the MSM (like Fox News).

>
> The source for the original "AAR stole from poor kids!"
> story comes from notorious right wing "newspaper" (and Rev.
> Moon-owned) Washington Times.
>
> As far as AAR itself is concerned, I find it incredibly
> refreshing. Unfortunately, the only RADIO show on the
> network is Randi Rhodes. Al Franken has some interesting
> content, but I just can't listen longer than a few minutes.
> Franken needs a better cohost, someone who knows about
> compelling radio -- like Randi or Ed S.
>
> Just my opinion. Your mileage may vary.
>