FilioScotia said:
If you want an example of how bad a one-man sports talk show can be look no further than Jim Rome. Case closed. Rome is as bad as it gets. I'd rather listen to paint drying. I don't know what kind of blackmail information he has on his network bosses, but it must be really really bad.
Rome is actually wildly successful. Not only do numerous radio affiliates come knocking on his door, but his live appearances draw like sporting events, and are held in stadiums, which tells me he connects with his audience. Affiliates and their local audiences even compete for these appearances. And this has been going on for 15? or so years. Although large, I still consider it a somewhat niche audience. But it is a very rabid niche audience, which to me proves the power of SAYING SOMETHING, rather than trying to please everyone.
I can understand someone listening a couple of times and concluding they dont like Rome. I first mistook his jargon for "rap-speak." I dont know what language he's speaking, but after a couple of broadcasts, it makes semi-sense, then becomes really amusing. Im not a big fan of the callers, but some of them are wildly funny, if not disturbed. I especially enjoy the idea of buzzing out the idiot callers, and then berating them. Anyone who's ever had to deal with the public, and was forced to be nice to them, can relate.
Rome does really quality interviews, in fact, I would call them "textbook," by modern standards. I like his editorial remarks for being strong, without gratuitous venom. His inside information is excellent, and has less to do with horse-trading, stats, & rumors than clubhouse chemisty, human interaction, and prophetic trends. Perhaps this is generational, but I find him funny.
Mostly, I like Rome because he has something to say, not just has to say something.