Cue me channeling Carson saying "That is wild. I did not know that!"
Based on similar situations in other markets, we see about 75% to 80% of listing going to translators when the AM has a limited signal (like an old Class IV) or is a daytimer.Then please tell me how you come to the conclusion that WECK has more FM listeners than AM?
So you are speculating on WECK. You have no basis, other than knowing some other markets. Cool…you don’t know.Based on similar situations in other markets, we see about 75% to 80% of listing going to translators when the AM has a limited signal (like an old Class IV) or is a daytimer.
In metros where the noise level is high, the use of AM be be even lower.
There are no cases that I know of where an AM with a comprable translator does better than the FM.
But .But.. But.. In Buffalo there is no cable TV, Internet, or motor cars---Not a single luxury. 80 percent of the hearing impaired and deceased population only uses AM Radio. This is undisputed fact...😑There are no cases that I know of where an AM with a comprable translator does better than the FM.
Buddy doesn't need Nielsen. The overwhelming majority of his sales are local direct.I did find out today that WECK has decided to dump Nielsen beginning soon. Shula is not renewing saying it is “voodoo math”. I do have to say that radio diary markets are far more unreliable than PPM markets. TV ratings are by far the most accurate.
How do you know?Buddy doesn't need Nielsen. The overwhelming majority of his sales are local direct.
Interesting. Doesn't Buddy also run an ad agency, and sales for a small local TV station? I wonder how his ad agency clients are going to feel about not having ratings for cost comparisons. We know from past posts here that Buddy lacks understanding of statistics, but one might think that many of his clients aren't similarly hampered.Buddy doesn't need Nielsen. The overwhelming majority of his sales are local direct.
So my question is: if Sr. Gleason is speculating on AM vs FM listening being greatly biased towards FM in situations where it has been measured, what proof do you have that 70% of WECK’s listening comes from the AM? Was there research done by you or others? Is there a breakdown on the ratings you’re privy to that shows actual AM vs FM listening? Was there a poll done at the American Legion?So you are speculating on WECK. You have no basis, other than knowing some other markets. Cool…you don’t know.
I am called on quite a bit to show “proof”, meanwhile others can speculate. David responds to mainly every post in the U.S.So my question is: if Sr. Gleason is speculating on AM vs FM listening being greatly biased towards FM in situations where it has been measured, what proof do you have that 70% of WECK’s listening comes from the AM? Was there research done by you or others? Is there a breakdown on the ratings you’re privy to that shows actual AM vs FM listening? Was there a poll done at the American Legion?
I am all ears….if one person is speculating in your mind, be prepared to show proof/sources to ensure your point is valid. Otherwise it may hurt when the shoe’s on the other foot.
He lacks statistics? Have you ever sat down with him to verify that? His stats seem pretty good where they matter. He has been wrong about some things here, but he has also been correct on many things.Interesting. Doesn't Buddy also run an ad agency, and sales for a small local TV station? I wonder how his ad agency clients are going to feel about not having ratings for cost comparisons. We know from past posts here that Buddy lacks understanding of statistics, but one might think that many of his clients aren't similarly hampered.
So, still no proof?I am called on quite a bit to show “proof”, meanwhile others can speculate. David responds to mainly every post in the U.S.
I am simply asking him, so he initiated the topic, on how he could possibly know what WECK audience is on AM/FM
He makes a lot of statements. With all the statements he makes, I do not think that showing a fact is anything outlandish.
I happen to know and do business with the owner. The owner, for now, subscribes to Nielsen. The owner knows what the breakout is. He has showed me do we can make informed decisions for our clients when purchasing ad time on WECK.
Aaannnd, so far, you've shown no proof. Oh, you do a lot of talking, but as far as showing us any proof, you've done nothing other than claiming Ostrander has shown you the breakdowns. Well, guess what? NO ONE CARES! Even Ostrander doesn't care about AM vs. FM listening. It's all listeners. Even the clients you talk about don't give a sh!t! All they want are results. They don't care if their message is received by AM, FM, smoke signal or carrier pigeon. It doesn't matter to anybody BUT you. You're so turned on by AM vs. FM I fear you're suffering from premature modulation.I am called on quite a bit to show “proof”, meanwhile others can speculate.
You might want to go back and look up Buddy's posts re: statistics. He's shown that he really doesn't understand them (or at least the methodology) and doesn't care to. It will be interesting to see how Nielsen reacts to Buddy dropping their ratings for his radio station but keeping them for his ad agency. Someone who's better versed in their pricing structure will likely be able to answer if one service is cheaper than the other, and if he'll still be able to use the "agency" numbers to sell the radio station.He lacks statistics? Have you ever sat down with him to verify that? His stats seem pretty good where they matter. He has been wrong about some things here, but he has also been correct on many things.
Being an educator yourself, you must realize that there are sometimes can be gray areas
The answer to your question is simple. Buddy is dropping Nielsen for WECK, not his ad agency, which buys spots on OTHER STATIONS. Buddy’s clients are already sold on WECK.
David has access to research that must be paid for. For you to have access you must be working for the person who paid for the research or the client who bought access to it. You cannon divulge specific details but you can generalize. Those demanding David 'put up' the details, I say, you show yours first and document the legitimacy. We're waiting (direct reference to Caddyshack).

I mean... I usually listen to the AMs of stations I can get on the FM dial. Music stations, too. I happen to love the sound of music on AM radio, especially when processed right.Well, I guess my vacation's over, and damned if I thought it would be a post about WECK that would drag me back here.
Let's address JP's Facebook post. He wrote:
"When I found out the promo and social media mentions of the show were taken down, I sent the owner an email which probably has his eyes still burning. How could you do that? And not even tell me. I told him that’s it, you won’t hear from me again.. (meaning I’ll do my job, but we have no reason to talk)"
Uh, JP, as a former owner, that is a resignation letter. It's not Ostrander's job to infer context. "You won't hear from me again" should be, and was, met with "Don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out". Good for Ostrander. His license, his money, his vision, his signature on your paycheck. End of story. This should have been on your final paycheck:
View attachment 7324
I love this little gem:
"First off, I’m not guessing, I know, we did a lot to change the culture there..for a while. I wish I had a buck for each time a now former colleague told me how much they loved the new fun environment we brought there."
Pat yourself on the back much? You need to see a doctor for the bruising. Seriously. A dollar for everyone who commented? What can you do with $18 in Buffalo? A couple of Big Macs and some fries? Ostrander was doing fine BEFORE you got there, and he'll do fine now. I don't care for his style, but I'll give him his due. WECK does well, he's happy with it, and that's the bottom line.
As far as AM versus FM listeners, NOBODY that has a choice is going to listen to AM if there is a corresponding FM signal. Ergo, most of WECK's listeners are probably from the FM translators. If Ostrander thought the AM was all he needed, he wouldn't waste the electricity on the FMs now, would he? Want to know what AM listeners look like?
View attachment 7325
Who cares if WECK is the 1st, 2nd or 53rd most listened to AM Oldies station? Outside of Buffalo, WECK is a roast beef sandwich. Come to think of it, inside Buffalo, WECK means a roast beef sandwich to most people.
I mean... RADIO is a dying medium. I get a chuckle out of all the folks here who keep talking about AM being a dying medium and that's why FM translators are the next thing. Yeah... for now. Sorry, but I don't think FM has a very rosy future, either. It's just not as far gone as AM is.The skeleton meme is aimed at AM overall, which is a dying medium. No question. Buffalo is an anomaly in that regard. Even Ostrander knows that AM has a finite lifespan. That's why he's streaming, utilizing FM translators, and will one day, no doubt, acquire a full-market FM signal, as he should. I never said he's not smart.
The stations you mentioned in Buffalo also are niche formats. Oldies is very specifically aimed at a certain age segment, as is News-Talk. Those listeners are older and grew up listening to AM, so they don't have to be enticed to the band. A lot of younger listeners never listened to AM, and fairly soon, we're going to encounter a generation that hasn't grown up listening to terrestrial Radio at all.
Enjoy AM while it's here, mourn it when it's gone, and then start worrying about how in the hell you're gonna keep them listening to FM next.
I mean... RADIO is a dying medium.