Well, according to the beauty numbers on Radio Online, the Atlanta FM station was apparently already suffering low ratings: 35+ stations ahead of them, including HD2's and HD3's. One could say, perhaps, they weren't rating at all.
Why are we discussing Atlanta ratings on a Seattle board? Focus, people!
Why are we discussing Atlanta ratings on a Seattle board? Focus, people!
Focus is good for a grid dip meter, but threads can be allowed to deviate a bit from the "center". The subject of smooth jazz came up in a Seattle context, and some evidence about the surviving station in the format nationally brought light to the lack of viability of the format here, there or anywhere.
Despite a forum already on this subject, it's good drive the Smooth Jazz into the ground so long as KWJZ is cited for that "Seattle context"? To top it off, it's a moderator discussing Panama City and Atlanta and "here there and everywhere" in the Seattle forum.
So long as it suits a moderator's preference?
Despite a forum already on this subject, it's good drive the Smooth Jazz into the ground so long as KWJZ is cited for that "Seattle context"? To top it off, it's a moderator discussing Panama City and Atlanta and "here there and everywhere" in the Seattle forum.
Normally I couldn't give a rip, but it pisses me off the nanosecond news about a person in Seattle radio passes on, the thread automatically gets banished to another forum.
Hypocrisy at its finest.
The moderation is kind of a like a PD who plays the music THEY want instead of sticking to the format and playing what the LISTENERS want.
Sure, a handful of listeners might be entertaining for a little while, but long term it's a failure when people aren't getting what they expect.