That's why they're called "classics".33 and loving every minute of this. Songs don’t have expiration dates
That's why they're called "classics".33 and loving every minute of this. Songs don’t have expiration dates
Yeah, but they want to hear new sometimes! So far the newest song The Eagle has played is 19 years old…🙃The younger crowd doesn’t want to hear “new, new, new” all the time.
True.Yeah, but they want to hear new sometimes! So far the newest song The Eagle has played is 19 years old…🙃
I disagree strongly insofar as the music is concerned. WCHI plays a ton of 80s butt rock and a decent dose of wimpy 90s alternative.True.
When I predicted this thing would sound like WCHI, I put little thought in to it and was just speculating. So far, though, it’s quite similar. iHeart has made an effort with WCHI personality wise but the music has been weak. Hopefully they make a personality effort with Eagle as well.
That's what gets me, not that this reversion happened but that this is the second time it happened, which only shows (if but unintentionally) indecision and a lack of commitment.I do not see the business strategy in returning to the Eagle, and you're right that rapidly going back and forth is not going to help bring listeners back, but that's not advocating for the listener. That's just media criticism, which is in a nutshell what most of this site is.
How about the fact KVIL is currently #1 or #2 in AQH share in Adults 25 to 54 in the entire market and can be sold in combo with 105.3 The Fan to boot?That's what gets me, not that this reversion happened but that this is the second time it happened, which only shows (if but unintentionally) indecision and a lack of commitment.
I'm struggling to think of any actual benefit going back to active rock besides it having much, much less overhead than the Freak (especially when it is likely all the personalities will be networked from elsewhere).
KROQ's playlist is 40% current/recurrents.Anyone calling the Eagle “classic rock”, should we call KROQ “classic rock” as well because they play Depeche Mode and Metallica
Isn't KVIL straight-up modern rock? Classic-heavy active rock and modern rock aren't exactly one and the same.How about the fact KVIL is currently #1 or #2 in AQH share in Adults 25 to 54 in the entire market and can be sold in combo with 105.3 The Fan to boot?
That's the problem. The Eagle brand is burned and spent and failed to naturally evolve like WMMS managed to do in the late 2000s. Can't exactly say it's a wise choice bringing back the same thing that already failed and expecting a different result, because Russ Martin ain't coming back.KVIL's numbers didn't start rising sharply until Russ Martin passed away and KEGL made a series of ill advised programming decisions.
That's the problem. The Eagle brand is burned and spent and failed to naturally evolve like WMMS managed to do in the late 2000s. Can't exactly say it's a wise choice bringing back the same thing that already failed and expecting a different result, because Russ Martin ain't coming back.
Isn't KVIL straight-up modern rock? Classic-heavy active rock and modern rock aren't exactly one and the same.
I disagree. This smacks of "much cheaper and budget-friendly than the Freak". A format flip of least resistance.Very true. KVIL was an imperfect substitute for The Eagle. That's why disenfranchised KEGL listeners who began listening to KVIL by default will likely listen to KVIL considerably less moving forward, in my opinion.
This "isn't the same thing that already failed."
How is a lineup presumably consisting of nothing but syndicated air talent (given this was almost entirely budget-driven) going to be any better? In order for such a format to work, it needs to be personality-driven. And again, the lack of a Russ Martin-type host in morning drive casts an oversized shadow over the whole thing.What failed was a mix of crappy talk shows (following Martin's passing) in afternoons, a lot of music preemptions for basketball games, and what appeared to be a less than optimal song playlist.
I don't think you could compare either of those two brands to the Eagle. Edge, yes. Eagle? Uh-uh.I thought the Live 105 and 99X brands were both heavily damaged goods and questioned the wisdom of resurrecting each (particularly the former). So far, both are performing very well.
this is very opinion based. Again. This board likes to pick and poke at this in order for things to not workThat's the problem. The Eagle brand is burned and spent and failed to naturally evolve like WMMS managed to do in the late 2000s. Can't exactly say it's a wise choice bringing back the same thing that already failed and expecting a different result, because Russ Martin ain't coming back.
why not? those are literally two examples of rock/alternative brands that are doing well. Both formats came back from the dead and are doing well. Why can‘t people just accept the fact this worked before without talk showsI don't think you could compare either of those two brands to the Eagle. Edge, yes. Eagle? Uh-uh.
What part of the Eagle previously failing and their signature personality dying and proving to be irreplaceable is opinion?this is very opinion based. Again. This board likes to pick and poke at this in order for things to not work