One of the things I can count on year in and year out on this board is the animus directed at satellite radio or frankly any other medium that is not heard on the AM/FM dial whenever it is brought up. I admit that I like rock radio. Since I was told earlier on this thread that "rock is rock" and there should be no difference paid to the actual type of rock music played, I did a comparison. Local rock radio comprises of KCBS-FM, KLOS, KRTH (Rock/Pop blend), KYSR, KROQ, and KCSN - six stations in total, all of which have narrow playlists and high commercial load, except for KCSN. KCSN does have a large playlist and few commercials, but can only be heard in the most specific of locales.
Sirius has (count 'em!) 23 channels devoted exclusively to rock music in one form or another, all with broader playlists than local radio can support and no commercials. This count doesn't even include the channels that are pop/rock mixes such as the five decades channels and the PopRocks channel, nor does it include the online-only channels such as Yacht Rock and Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (which can easily be played via the phone if one were so inclined).
But I am told that this is a niche product and the local broadcasters needn't worry about it as competition.
I've been an XM subscriber since 2003. I also am not in the radio industry. I have no dog in this fight, no personal animus. I just can't see, realistically, why terrestrial radio should be dreading "competition" from a rival delivery system that has only found 30 million users (probably less in terms of actual listeners given the New York sharpies' at SXM's way of cooking the "subscriber" numbers to barely pass muster with the SEC) in nearly two full decades. Satellite radio is a nice, profitable little niche. I appreciate much of what it offers. But I never bought into th thinking that it was a bona fide existential threat to terrestrial radio, and see no reason to start doing so now simply because a 60-plus-year-old genre of popular music is winding down. .