• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KRTH Top 500 Countdown issues

DavidEduardo said:
KRTH is doing incredibly well for it's genre, but look at the #1 station... KIIS with about 100 songs.

KIIS-FM cannot be compared to a classic hits station. You are dealing with currents, not the thousands of past hits.
You'd expect frequent repetition on KIIS, not on KRTH. And remember, not all 100 KIIS songs are current, some may be recent hits from just a few years back or last year.

Anyways, it's mainly teens to 24 that listen to KIIS and they love those hits of today (for the most part) regardless how many times these songs air. It's just a totally different scene with CHR radio.
 
DavidEduardo said:
scooty430 said:
The "terms" aren't as complex as you like to believe.

Then you must be a poor learner, as you don't understand sampling, statistics and the meaning of the Arbitron terms.

I tend to believe the articles I read in the press rather than a guy on a message board.

The newspaper people have no knowledge of radio, ever, and are a competitor to boot. On the other hand, I have been dealing with Arbitron for one short of 40 years, and have even been invited by Arbitron to present seminars on the survey and the survey review process in the world's largest radio market.

And what I have read is that PPM is showing much lower listening levels than ever before.

Most stations have shown a doubling of cume (or more) by occasional listeners (5 minutes in the paint shop, 10 minutes in the drug store, etc). If you double the total listeners, but all the new ones listen about 15 minutes, and the old ones l,isten 8 hours, the result will be TSL that is half that of the diary.

Again, something you do not understand.

Further, let's say a person listens from 3:12 to 3:40. In the diary, they would usually write "3 PM to 4 PM" and give the station 4 quarter hours. In the PPM, they get credit for only 2 quarter hours. It's the same real listening, but more accurately recorded... not a decline in listening.

An average of 8 hours a week.. Take out the forced office listening, which raises the average way up, you again see casual, non-devoted listening.

Believe it or not, most people don't even work in an office. And most at work listening, office, factory, shop, consturction site, loading dock or machine shop is personal, not in a group.

Regarding JACK playing 900 songs on "Mediabase," if you've ever listened to a station, then checked Mediabase, you will find it misses a good third of the songs.

The real MediaBase that we pay thousands per month for does not miss any songs on Jack.

As for your "900" figure, over how long a time period? Even you know that JACK is constantly rotating tracks around to keep them from burnout.

That is the library. While in LA Kevin seems to have a few songs that go in for things like rainy days, that's it. I took a 35 day non-Christmas period prior to Thanksgiving and listed every song played 2 times or more, and got 867 songs. If I go to one spin in 5 weeks, I get 911 songs, so what we have are a few very light spin songs that the average listener will hear about once every 2 or 3 years.

As for "saying anything to the press," are you suggesting Kevin Weatherly is a liar?

No, he is doing just what I would do or anyone else would... a bit of hyperbole and a bit of data to throw competitors off the track. There are no 2000 songs on Jack. And I know that MediaBase does not lie, particularly on mainstream English language music. They miss a tune or two a day on Recuerdo, but we play lots of imports that were never produced in the US, so that is understandable. But on any kind of American popular music, there is seldom a misdetection, and if there is it is usually because the station had a technical glitch or artifact during the fingerprint... which in LA seldom occurs.

I don't know where you live, but I have JACK (and K-Earth and KLOS) on the presets, and the playlist is constantly changing. Sure, in a month they may play "only" 1000 songs, as you say (which is actually massive for a corporate radio station.) But month to month, things change. A lot. In fact, the station has evolved from airing lots of 70s pop like "Brother Louie" to lots (and I mean LOTS) of old KROQ hits from the 80s - many of them LA-only faves like Oingo Boingo. It is very smartly programmed, because it never sounds too stale, yet everything sounds familiar. Personally, I don't care for the snarky announcer and jukebox feel, but they do it well.

Great example of how you CAN play 1000 songs a month (or 2000 or 3000 over a couple years) and be a ratings success.

As for Mediabase, maybe you should get a hotel in LA, a tape recorder, and actually check if it's accurate. Those of us who actually listen to the radio notice that it's inaccurate. Heck, today Mediabase missed a BRYAN ADAMS song that KLOS was playing. Bryan Adams is not exactly an obscure artist.

(As part of a 2500+ song A to Z, by the way - one which included 25 minute Pink Floyd songs, King Crimson played during drive-time, Alice's Restaurant, and a full In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida. ((Use google if you aren't familiar with these artists or titles, which I strongly suspect.)) And it's still going. Gosh, guess you don't consult for KLOS!)
 
scooty430 said:
DavidEduardo said:
scooty430 said:
The "terms" aren't as complex as you like to believe.

Then you must be a poor learner, as you don't understand sampling, statistics and the meaning of the Arbitron terms.

I tend to believe the articles I read in the press rather than a guy on a message board.

The newspaper people have no knowledge of radio, ever, and are a competitor to boot. On the other hand, I have been dealing with Arbitron for one short of 40 years, and have even been invited by Arbitron to present seminars on the survey and the survey review process in the world's largest radio market.

And what I have read is that PPM is showing much lower listening levels than ever before.

Most stations have shown a doubling of cume (or more) by occasional listeners (5 minutes in the paint shop, 10 minutes in the drug store, etc). If you double the total listeners, but all the new ones listen about 15 minutes, and the old ones l,isten 8 hours, the result will be TSL that is half that of the diary.

Again, something you do not understand.

Further, let's say a person listens from 3:12 to 3:40. In the diary, they would usually write "3 PM to 4 PM" and give the station 4 quarter hours. In the PPM, they get credit for only 2 quarter hours. It's the same real listening, but more accurately recorded... not a decline in listening.

An average of 8 hours a week.. Take out the forced office listening, which raises the average way up, you again see casual, non-devoted listening.

Believe it or not, most people don't even work in an office. And most at work listening, office, factory, shop, consturction site, loading dock or machine shop is personal, not in a group.

Regarding JACK playing 900 songs on "Mediabase," if you've ever listened to a station, then checked Mediabase, you will find it misses a good third of the songs.

The real MediaBase that we pay thousands per month for does not miss any songs on Jack.

As for your "900" figure, over how long a time period? Even you know that JACK is constantly rotating tracks around to keep them from burnout.

That is the library. While in LA Kevin seems to have a few songs that go in for things like rainy days, that's it. I took a 35 day non-Christmas period prior to Thanksgiving and listed every song played 2 times or more, and got 867 songs. If I go to one spin in 5 weeks, I get 911 songs, so what we have are a few very light spin songs that the average listener will hear about once every 2 or 3 years.

As for "saying anything to the press," are you suggesting Kevin Weatherly is a liar?

No, he is doing just what I would do or anyone else would... a bit of hyperbole and a bit of data to throw competitors off the track. There are no 2000 songs on Jack. And I know that MediaBase does not lie, particularly on mainstream English language music. They miss a tune or two a day on Recuerdo, but we play lots of imports that were never produced in the US, so that is understandable. But on any kind of American popular music, there is seldom a misdetection, and if there is it is usually because the station had a technical glitch or artifact during the fingerprint... which in LA seldom occurs.

I don't know where you live, but I have JACK (and K-Earth and KLOS) on the presets, and the playlist is constantly changing. Sure, in a month they may play "only" 1000 songs, as you say (which is actually massive for a corporate radio station.) But month to month, things change. A lot. In fact, the station has evolved from airing lots of 70s pop like "Brother Louie" to lots (and I mean LOTS) of old KROQ hits from the 80s - many of them LA-only faves like Oingo Boingo. It is very smartly programmed, because it never sounds too stale, yet everything sounds familiar. Personally, I don't care for the snarky announcer and jukebox feel, but they do it well.

Great example of how you CAN play 1000 songs a month (or 2000 or 3000 over a couple years) and be a ratings success.

As for Mediabase, maybe you should get a hotel in LA, a tape recorder, and actually check if it's accurate. Those of us who actually listen to the radio notice that it's inaccurate. Heck, today Mediabase missed a BRYAN ADAMS song that KLOS was playing. Bryan Adams is not exactly an obscure artist.

(As part of a 2500+ song A to Z, by the way - one which included 25 minute Pink Floyd songs, King Crimson played during drive-time, Alice's Restaurant, a 15 minute "Telegraph Road" by Dire Straits aired at 1pm, and a full In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida. ((Use google if you aren't familiar with these artists or titles, which I strongly suspect.)) And it's still going. Gosh, guess you don't consult for KLOS!)
 
scooty430 said:
I don't know where you live,

I "live" at 655 N. Central in Glendale, home of three of LA's top 10 radio stations. I'm amazed you have not realized I am in LA radio at this point. But then again, awareness is apparently not on your agenda... playing obsucre oldies only you still want to hear is all that is on that agenda.

but I have JACK (and K-Earth and KLOS) on the presets, and the playlist is constantly changing. Sure, in a month they may play "only" 1000 songs, as you say (which is actually massive for a corporate radio station.)

I did not say 1000 songs in a month. I said 915 in 5 weeks, 35 days. Thats a difference of 10% in library, and 25% in time... and you have the gall to say I play it loose with figures. You have just distorted and misquoted twice in a single sentence.

For your information, the average Jack or similar is a "corporate" station which has license the concept, which is from Canada, and is based on a playlist that is miles wide and very shallow... about 40 years of music, sliced very thin and about 800-900 songs, depending on the market.

And further, most major market country stations are "corporate" owned and play around 700 to 800 songs, so a library that size is not that unusual. I work with a group of about a dozen stations in major markets that have libraries that are in excess of 1000 songs. Library size is dependent on how many songs the listeners still want to hear, not the ownership status.

Oh, and I looked at a full trimester of KCBS FM, 13 weeks. The total of songs played was still less than 1000... so your idea that they are rotating stuff in and out is wrong and just not true.

Now, for your amusement and edification, here is really what is happening...

Stations use computer music scheduling, and one of the first things this does is make sure songs don't play in the same hour or daypart the next time the play... in fact, we try to have the songs rotate through dayparts before coming back to a specific one, and then we try for it to come back at different hours each time it does return to a daypart. This means the average core listener who spends 6 to 12 hours a week with the station would not hear the same songs for several months sometimes, giving the impression that the songs are rested when in fact that they have been cycling through hours when that listener never listens.

But month to month, things change.

No, they don't. I ran several 14 week analysis reports, and the number of songs does not reach 1000.

The only time a bunch of songs may change is when the station does a test, as Jack did in LA with Coleman in November... then there may be hundreds of changes, all in the same week or few weeks, and then the list will be static till the next test.

A lot. In fact, the station has evolved from airing lots of 70s pop like "Brother Louie" to lots (and I mean LOTS) of old KROQ hits from the 80s - many of them LA-only faves like Oingo Boingo.

Huh? Oingo Boingo got huge play on WCAD back when they were "current." Check a listing and you will see that it would be hard to find a farther off US station.

Hint... all station lists evolve over time, even if they keep a consistent sound. Some changes are due to keeping the station in-demo, and some are due to songs being played out, or the opposite, gaining in score and requiring higher rotations.

It is very smartly programmed, because it never sounds too stale, yet everything sounds familiar. Personally, I don't care for the snarky announcer and jukebox feel, but they do it well.

It's so smartly programmed you think they change the music every month, when, in fact, they do no such thing... they just have selector very well set up to give the illusion of variety with an almost static library.

Great example of how you CAN play 1000 songs a month (or 2000 or 3000 over a couple years) and be a ratings success.

Aside from the ins and outs from testing, the library is under 1000.... more like 900. But they sure have you believing that there are more... which is exactly what they want!!!!!!!

As for Mediabase, maybe you should get a hotel in LA, a tape recorder, and actually check if it's accurate. Those of us who actually listen to the radio notice that it's inaccurate. Heck, today Mediabase missed a BRYAN ADAMS song that KLOS was playing. Bryan Adams is not exactly an obscure artist.

You don't have the real MediaBase service that costs tens of thousands a year... you have the service that puts plays on the webpage of a station based on a data stream. The "real" service is based on monitor receivers in each market and fingerprint detection for every song. And it is deadly accurate save for technical glitches at the station that harm a fingerprint.

And I don't need a room in LA... I have a home here. Please click on the link at the bottom of this message.

And nobody uses a "tape recorder" anymore.

(As part of a 2500+ song A to Z, by the way - one which included 25 minute Pink Floyd songs, King Crimson played during drive-time, Alice's Restaurant, and a full In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida. ((Use google if you aren't familiar with these artists or titles, which I strongly suspect.)) And it's still going. Gosh, guess you don't consult for KLOS!)
[/quote]
 
oldies76 said:
Anyways, it's mainly teens to 24 that listen to KIIS and they love those hits of today (for the most part) regardless how many times these songs air. It's just a totally different scene with CHR radio.

This is the day for the correction of totally false data here.

This time it is telling you that KIIS's strength is Women 18-34 and 25-44.

In December, the AQH Person average (redundancy intentional) is... (rounded to thousands)

12-17 12,000
18-24 12,000
25-34 15,000
35-44 11,000
45-54 9,000
45+ 3,000

You say the strength is 12-24, where actually 25-44 has several thousand AQH persons more than the younger group. Apparently, adults like hearing the hits very often. The station has a total weekly cume of 3.5 million 12+ persons out of 10.4 million LA total 12+ persons... a third of all persons in LA listen to KIIS each week.
 
DavidEduardo said:
And nobody uses a "tape recorder" anymore.

Hey, I still use my Akai X-200D Reel to Reel (circa 1970) and it sounds great!

"Nobody uses a tape recorder anymore"..where did you get that one from?? And yes I have an MP3 player too.
 
oldies76 said:
DavidEduardo said:
And nobody uses a "tape recorder" anymore.

Hey, I still use my Akai X-200D Reel to Reel (circa 1970) and it sounds great!

"Nobody uses a tape recorder anymore"..where did you get that one from?? And yes I have an MP3 player too.

An exception makes the rule. When you have to search for one person who uses a tape recorder, then it's likely that they are the statistical anomoly that proves the statement: nobody use a tape recorder any more. Heck, hardly anyone uses a cassette recorder any more either.
 
David, give it up. You will never convince those who know so much more than you!

May I suggest that our "experts" buy an iPod and fill it with their favorite music. Leave radio to people who know what they are talking about. Radio is a businesss. (David has been in it for a good long while now, and has tons of research at his hand. The radio BUSINESS can not afford to program for a small clique of wannabees.)

BTW, the splintering of audience has a lot more to do with options tha errors. MP3s. Satellite. Streaming online. CDs And on and on. There waa a day when AM ruled the roost, with shares as high as 70% (at least according to Hooper.) Those days began to wane with FM, then other media.

And radio continues to cume magnificently, thank you.

Again, David, you can deal with facts all day. Our "experts" will never be troubled by facts.\

BTW, HAPPY BIRTHDAY. And thanks for trying to bring a bit of reality to this board.
 
observer8057 said:
David, give it up. You will never convince those who know so much more than you!

May I suggest that our "experts" buy an iPod and fill it with their favorite music. Leave radio to people who know what they are talking about. Radio is a businesss. (David has been in it for a good long while now, and has tons of research at his hand. The radio BUSINESS can not afford to program for a small clique of wannabees.)

We're discussing these aspects based on a LISTENERS point of view (the other way around). Go sit near a radio for an hour or so a day and then you'll get a picture on what we're trying to convey. Simply said, it all about the music, the frequency of it aired and the way it's presented to us. It's not about trying to be an expert in David's field or your idea of "wannabees", it's simply the reality based on a few of us and listeners who enjoy oldies and want more songs aired.

If you have read this entire thread or others from the past, it's information we've posted, that is revelant to what is aired or featured on classic hits stations. Some stations do a better job than others and there are some that we feel that do not live up to certain expectations. We mention these issues and they get knocked down by the business side of things, it's a see-saw battle.

Oldies fans and most listeners enjoy their music and most dislike frequent repetition and boring programming and features. WCBS does it's thing and KRTH does theirs. These two stations are classic hits stations and therefore should provide us with an abundance of song selections and features. WCBS does for the most part, KRTH does not.

Statistically speaking (business side) the numbers may prove otherwise, PPM this, Cume that, Ratings this, Demos that. It's understood. For most listeners though, it's the other side of the coin.

Would you be content with just 500 oldies played over and over with limited features, or would you want a playlist with more choices, more hits and specialties and a basic analysis during specials? Isn't that what radio should be?
 
oldies76 said:
We're discussing these aspects based on a LISTENERS point of view (the other way around).

No, you don't represent even a few listeners. You represent a fringe element that can not be satisfied without destroying our large core audiences who are happy with what we do.

it's simply the reality based on a few of us and listeners who enjoy oldies and want more songs aired.

And that is another thing most listeners don't want. The proof is in the fact that stations with shorter playlists consistently beat those with longer ones.

. We mention these issues and they get knocked down by the business side of things, it's a see-saw battle.

No, it is one sided. Most listeners like what stations offer. We make money, and keep giving it to them. The very, very, very few who don't like it will not be happy, ever. So we ignore them.

Oldies fans and most listeners enjoy their music and most dislike frequent repetition and boring programming and features.

Most listeners want to hear their favorites often.

WCBS does it's thing and KRTH does theirs. These two stations are classic hits stations and therefore should provide us with an abundance of song selections and features. WCBS does for the most part, KRTH does not.

Yet MediaBase shows they play about the same size library.

Statistically speaking (business side) the numbers may prove otherwise, PPM this, Cume that, Ratings this, Demos that. It's understood. For most listeners though, it's the other side of the coin.

Would you be content with just 500 oldies played over and over with limited features, or would you want a playlist with more choices, more hits and specialties and a basic analysis during specials? Isn't that what radio should be?

No, it is not. We ask listeners what songs to play and what jocks they like and so on, and they tell us to play their favorites very often. They tune out when they hear too many songs that are not their favorites.
 
DavidEduardo said:
You represent a fringe element that can not be satisfied without destroying our large core audiences who are happy with what we do.

Fringe element and destroying...Really?? The real and majority of the listening world seriously awaits you.

DavidEduardo said:
And that is another thing most listeners don't want.

You having a hard time realizing that CBS-FM is doing this already. Look at a months worth of Mediabase lists.

DavidEduardo said:
Yet MediaBase shows they play about the same size library.

WCBS's is much larger, if you include weekend programming and specials. Study a month's worth of Mediabase lists.
And remember, we're talking the span of years involved too!
 
oldies76 said:
You having a hard time realizing that CBS-FM is doing this already. Look at a months worth of Mediabase lists.

Yeah, the number of songs is within the normal range for a classic hits station.

KRTH, with an overall 6+ 4.2, has about 700 songs in the average week. WOGL in Philly has about 800, and has a 5.4, and WCBS has nearly 900 and has a 3.7.

If we thought there was a correlation, we might say the ideal classic hits library would be between 700 and 800. But that ignores the fact that there are diffferent competitive factores, ethnicities, average market age, etc., in each market.

WCBS's is much larger, if you include weekend programming and specials. Study a month's worth of Mediabase lists.
And remember, we're talking the span of years involved too!

Actually, if we take off the specialty shows, the library on CBS is right in the range of KRTH and WOGL. In other words, the normal rotation library on each of these 3 CBS stations.

There is no point in arguing this, as each market has slightly different library sizes based on local research... the same format in different markets may be as much ass +/- 20% different from market to market.
 
oldies76 said:
Top 500 countdown this year seems like a re-work of their already tight playlist, in a different order.

Also why are they only featuring 14 post 1980 songs, the vast majority of them ranked in the 400's??

Also included is one song from 1999, "Smooth"

If you are going to do an ALL-TIME Top 500 countdown, then it needs to reflect more accurately the music of ALL-TIME, in their case, Sixties thru the Eighties and the real top hits, not theirs.

Reworking your everyday playlist to present a countdown of all-time is not the way to do this.

Tight playlists usually win
 
observer8057 said:
David, give it up. You will never convince those who know so much more than you!

May I suggest that our "experts" buy an iPod and fill it with their favorite music. Leave radio to people who know what they are talking about. Radio is a businesss. (David has been in it for a good long while now, and has tons of research at his hand. The radio BUSINESS can not afford to program for a small clique of wannabees.)

BTW, the splintering of audience has a lot more to do with options tha errors. MP3s. Satellite. Streaming online. CDs And on and on. There waa a day when AM ruled the roost, with shares as high as 70% (at least according to Hooper.) Those days began to wane with FM, then other media.

And radio continues to cume magnificently, thank you.

Again, David, you can deal with facts all day. Our "experts" will never be troubled by facts.\

BTW, HAPPY BIRTHDAY. And thanks for trying to bring a bit of reality to this board.

I again invite you, David, and all other delusional radio people who think the population likes what you give us to go to google.

Type in a few phrases like "radio sucks," or "boring playlists," or "mind-numbing terrestrial" or anything along those lines. See how many hits you get, and maybe read some of what ordinary people actually say about radio.

Then type in "I love radio," or "K-Earth is so fantastic," or "Terrestrial radio is the best," or what have you. Gosh, not so many responses, huh?

While you are at it, please see if you can find a fan website for K-Earth, KLOS, etc. Can you find a MySpace or Facebook page with impassioned fans leaving comments?

In this day and age, where you can find fans of just about ANYTHING, doesn't that strike you as odd, especially for something with so much exposure?

You are in denial. The public has left radio behind. It's not that they hate radio.....they just don't even care about it. It's off the radar.
 
DavidEduardo said:
oldies76 said:
We're discussing these aspects based on a LISTENERS point of view (the other way around).

No, you don't represent even a few listeners. You represent a fringe element that can not be satisfied without destroying our large core audiences who are happy with what we do.

it's simply the reality based on a few of us and listeners who enjoy oldies and want more songs aired.

And that is another thing most listeners don't want. The proof is in the fact that stations with shorter playlists consistently beat those with longer ones.

. We mention these issues and they get knocked down by the business side of things, it's a see-saw battle.

No, it is one sided. Most listeners like what stations offer. We make money, and keep giving it to them. The very, very, very few who don't like it will not be happy, ever. So we ignore them.

Oldies fans and most listeners enjoy their music and most dislike frequent repetition and boring programming and features.

Most listeners want to hear their favorites often.

WCBS does it's thing and KRTH does theirs. These two stations are classic hits stations and therefore should provide us with an abundance of song selections and features. WCBS does for the most part, KRTH does not.

Yet MediaBase shows they play about the same size library.

Statistically speaking (business side) the numbers may prove otherwise, PPM this, Cume that, Ratings this, Demos that. It's understood. For most listeners though, it's the other side of the coin.

Would you be content with just 500 oldies played over and over with limited features, or would you want a playlist with more choices, more hits and specialties and a basic analysis during specials? Isn't that what radio should be?

No, it is not. We ask listeners what songs to play and what jocks they like and so on, and they tell us to play their favorites very often. They tune out when they hear too many songs that are not their favorites.

Give me a B

Give me an O

Give me an R

Give me an I

Give me an N

Give me a G

What's that spell?

RADIO!!!! YAY!
 
Here, I'll get you started researching what people think about radio. From a Wired article:

Between the 1920s, when the first stations began to broadcast, and the end of grunge in the 1990s, music played over the radio was arguably the most innovative force in US popular culture. The sound of jazz, country, and rock pulsing from every dashboard in the nation inspired and drove Hollywood, Broadway, Seventh Avenue, literature, television, and practically everything else. But in the past decade, radio changed from a village of small, independent stations to a bastion of the US media oligopoly, content to deliver sterile, cookie-cutter broadcasts. The transition made sense economically, because Big Radio was able to cut costs by consolidating advertising departments and using the same programming across the country. But alienated listeners fled in droves.

Noting radio's declining audiences, recurring low-level payola scandals, horrendous public image, and competition for drive-time ears from iPods, satellite broadcasting, and cell phones, pundits have been gleefully pronouncing the medium's last rites.


Go ahead and look for more like that.

Or is it too hard to look in the mirror?
 
scooty430 said:
Here, I'll get you started researching what people think about radio. From a Wired article:

"But in the past decade, radio changed from a village of small, independent stations to a bastion of the US media oligopoly, content to deliver sterile, cookie-cutter broadcasts".

So true! With an exception of a few that side with what listeners really want and ignore the risks that most stations seem to unwilling to take.
 
scooty430 said:
Here, I'll get you started researching what people think about radio. From a Wired article:

Between the 1920s, when the first stations began to broadcast, and the end of grunge in the 1990s, music played over the radio was arguably the most innovative force in US popular culture. The sound of jazz, country, and rock pulsing from every dashboard in the nation inspired and drove Hollywood, Broadway, Seventh Avenue, literature, television, and practically everything else. But in the past decade, radio changed from a village of small, independent stations to a bastion of the US media oligopoly, content to deliver sterile, cookie-cutter broadcasts. The transition made sense economically, because Big Radio was able to cut costs by consolidating advertising departments and using the same programming across the country. But alienated listeners fled in droves.

Noting radio's declining audiences, recurring low-level payola scandals, horrendous public image, and competition for drive-time ears from iPods, satellite broadcasting, and cell phones, pundits have been gleefully pronouncing the medium's last rites.


Go ahead and look for more like that.

Or is it too hard to look in the mirror?

The problems with today's radio are almost too numerous to list. The main problem is that most of today's owners are not actual broadcasters. They weren't schooled in radio nor do they have a passion for it. They are companies that bought large numbers of stations when the Communications Act of 1996 opened up the ownership rules allowing them to be bought up like real estate. Research has been relied upon to a numbing degree as well. All of this is NOT to say that there aren't real broadcasters working in the business, they're just not in charge in most instances.

I still disagree with you about KRTH. It is a well run, well programmed station. Could they play a larger variety? Perhaps, but they are far and away a better station now than they were before their current program director took over. It's very easy to tell that KRTH's playlist is constantly maintained, songs are rotated in and out. You'll notice that you'll hear a song for a week or so every 16 to 18 hours or so and then it's replaced by another. It gives the illusion of a greater library. The problem is that KRTH and any station for that matter can't be everything to everyone. It's isn't perfect, but it's the best that we've got. Beyond that, I say get an ipod and fill it up, it may be the only way to hear all of the music you desire because today's radio isn't your parent's radio. I wish it were but its not...
 
oldies76 said:
So true! With an exception of a few that side with what listeners really want and ignore the risks that most stations seem to unwilling to take.

Nearly every rated market station spends lots of money to talk with listeners and find out their likes and dislikes.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom