scooty430 said:
Dude, chill out. How am I supposed to know your real name? Your screen name is Eduardo. If you don't like it I suggest you change it.
"Eduardo" is not a last name. And if you click the link below, you can very, very easily see that.
As for JACK playing 25 percent post 1990, may I remind you 1990 was 20 years ago. It's an oldies station. Not "oldies" as in Presley and Roy Orbison. I mean oldies as in old music.
On that criteria, every station in LA plays oldie. In any case, I specified the formats that are 100% pre-1990 music and you are just obfuscating.
In the industry, "oldies" means 60's, "classic hits" means 70's and "80's" means an 80's based format. "oldies" does not mean Jack... "Adult hits" is the definition for Jack stations and similar ones. If you are going to discuss insects, you had better know the difference between a roach and a spider, but you are discussing radio based on terms you are making up as you go. Anyone can win an argument with that tactic.
In fact, I don't know how much you know about the LA market,
Hahahahaha. Funny line. I've programmed 7 different LA stations, including a couple that were #1. And one that is, today, an adult hits station that beats KRTH quite consistently.
but JACK has now evolved into largely a "KROQ classic" station. Depeche Mode, Oingo Boingo..... Old music.
Jack is an adult hits station. That is the definition buyers use to define the format both in LA and nationally.
As for African-Americans not liking the soul music KRTH plays, that is a bit baffling. KACE had a pretty much African-American listener base (I may have been their only Anglo listener.) Their playlist was very similar in some ways to KRTH: Aretha, Otis, Marvin, Brown, Wonder... Are you saying African Americans don't like this music? I frankly find that bizarre.
Look at an Urban AC and tell me how much Motown they play. Anyway, the black audience will not come for the percentage of music by black artists on KRTH, because they are not generally going to tolerate the Beach Boys and Beatles tunes.
Here is the basic point: KRTH is the #6 English-language station overall.
No, it's not. You are using old data.
It is the #4 English-language music station. It is the #11 station including Spanish stations,
There are only 100 shares in LA. You HAVE to include the Spanish language stations or you don't get 100. Oh, and Spanish stations are radio stations in Spain.
which get high ratings as there aren't many choices for Spanish speakers to choose from.
There are 14 stations in Spanish in LA, and they offer a very broad spectrum of formats.
I know you don't care about overall ratings, but I do, because you are only focused on money.
I am focused on sales demos, since I like to get paid and the owners expect to make a buck or two. Sales demos end with a brick wall at 55. In 18 to 54 year olds, KRTH is 9th. That's good for making very decent money in LA, but with under a 4 share, it means that very few people... one out of 25... is listening.
But overall 12+ matters to me.
But it matters not a tad to radio stations. We can not sell with 12+, get a loan with 12+, or even get famous with 12+. That is why Arbitron gives that data away... it's worthless to those who run radio stations.
That is what, by definition, everyone is listening to. To me, #11 in this huge market of so many stations is an amazing performance. And I KNOW that WCBS is doing even better. Oldies rule!
Neither station is "oldies." Both are "classic hits."
To put everything in perspective, there are only 28 "viable" stations in the market.
Lastly, your central point actually proves something I tried to say months ago, which at the time you negated: Not a lot of people are listening to ANY station.
I never said anything even close to that. I said that with many stations, the average share for each station is lower. And as each of the "viable" stations improves individually, we have the top tier of stations around a 5 share to a 4 share. This, in the industry that you so painfully misunderstand, is called fragmentation which, in turn, causes share compression.
Share is the percentage of those listening to the radio. Whether one person or 3 million are listening at any given time, there are no more nor no less than 100 shares.
Radio continues to reach over 95% of all persons each week.
Radio is losing listeners.
Another inaccurate statement. Radio is not losing listeners. While the time each listener spends listening has slowly declined over the last two decades, it is not losing listeners.
But of course at the time you pulled out some out of context stat that said "95 percent of people use radio weekly."
That is the weekly cume of radio. Direct from Arbitron PPM data.
You can't have it both ways. Is barely anybody listening, or is everybody listening?
You really don't get it. Please, go to
www.arbitron.com and look at the things like format descriptors, terms of the trade (in the Purple Book) and even take the Arbitron 101 courses for diary and PPM. You will quickly understand how wrong you are about nearly everything you say indefense of those dusty 60's song.