• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

KSFO To 810

You missed the point. The branding was 560 at the top of the hour and 810 after news and traffic. Hence a lack of consistency or coordination.
I agree, they need to drop any and all reference to 560. Maybe run a liner...810 is the new home for KSFO, change your presets now.
 
You missed the point. The branding was 560 at the top of the hour and 810 after news and traffic. Hence a lack of consistency or coordination.

And so? They're doing a simulcast, right? That means the same content on both frequencies.

I agree, they need to drop any and all reference to 560. Maybe run a liner...810 is the new home for KSFO, change your presets now.

You're assuming the simulcast is temporary.
 
Public Radio NPR 1550 KUAZ is a simulcast of KUAZ-FM in Tucson. The AM is a 50kw daytimer with a CP for a new tower site that will add nighttime coverage. Below are coverage maps of the AZPM signals, which illustrate why they continue to hang on to the AM.

Coverage Maps - AZPM
That map for 1550 is highly exaggerated. It's barely audible in Mesa. No way does it give coverage into Scottsdale.

830 is another story, withits much superior coverage. But it shows the difference between the (better) lower end of the Ancient Modulation dial and the high end.
 
KSFO isn't going to be on both forever. That's all I know..
The very notion that the simulcast would last beyond a transition period was ludicrous, especially for a company looking for cash wherever it can get it. But I didn't want to pursue that argument because it would've gone on forever without concluding anything.

We will know when we know, and whatever it is will likely have minimal impact on the market.
 
What could KZAC mean? In guessing something not worth listening to for me.

They could be clearing more conservative talk like that EIB Limbaugh replacement show.
KZAC? (Does anyone really believe the Bay Area needs another purveyor of third-tier wingnut talk? If you do, KTRB is sitting there, just waiting for your contribution to their cume.)
 
But seriously, folks--call letters don't need to mean anything. KISQ doesn't spell "Breeze", KIOI doesn't spell "Star", KOSF doesn't spell "Classic Hits 103.7".

I know we're talking Cumulus and not iHeart---but same principle. If you're worrying about call-letter-based branding on AM in San Francisco in 2025, you're working way harder than the people who own the stations.
 
KZAC? (Does anyone really believe the Bay Area needs another purveyor of third-tier wingnut talk? If you do, KTRB is sitting there, just waiting for your contribution to their cume.)
There’s no way I would contribute to their cume. But nobody is carrying Clay and Bud in the Bay Area. Not that they would get many listeners or that Savage guy.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom