D
djmimi
Guest
Radknowski said:David: Like many others, I check the LA board to read your posts which offer insight and valuable information, to say nothing of occasional sarcasm and wit. This having been said, I have to ask if and why there isn't a place in L-A for a station like Indie 103.1. I'm not a "fan" of the station, nor will I profess to know a lot about the LA market. I'm just some guy in Buffalo who enjoys the biz, having spent a few years in it.
It seems to me that a station like Indie serves a devoted, albeit small, segment of available listeners. At $10 million per rating share in LA, it has to be making some money. If Indie adopted a format that reached more listeners and generated better ratings, would it not be only a (short) matter of time before another full power LA station co-opted that format (either by direct competition or flanking) and squashed Indies (again)?
From the favorable Indie posts on this board and a look at the cursory 12+ ratings published in R&R, it seems Indie serves a fairly good purpose, especially given the limitations of its signal. Sure, the present format can be tweaked and polished, but given the big players and the big signals in LA, what's a little fish like Indie to do? Seems like it's swimming with sharks and surviving. Is "surviving" good enough? Thanks. Regards, -Mike Radknowski
I like this post. What I usually see is shark mentality on these boards. We're commercial broadcasters, we want to win and find the format that will get the numbers. But, truthfully, if I may get a little philosophical here, the commercial sentiment conflicts with our prime directive from the government, which is to serve the community. And that means serving those segments who don't run with the mainstream crowd. Perhaps David, if you can alter your thinking from the normal path to winning the greater majority to ways to helping out a unique format survive among the sharks?? This would involve some pretty creative thinking I would imagine!