• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

LaPowerFM 105.3

David, why encourage this? Let the powers that be sort out any allegations of wrongdoing. This blog does not need to take on a leadership role in egging on unpredictable members of the public.
Suggesting that an engineer with FM field strength measurement equipment conduct a signal strength survey is simply describing what is normally done in such cases.

Step two is submitting the findings to the FCC and requesting formally or informally an investigation. The FCC does not (and has not for years and years) had staff doing random field strength testing. They depend on local interested parties to submit findings.
 
Wow! Some folks take matters into their own hands. Is Entercom & Univision really that scared of a lil Transalator Broadcasting a "cazuela/gumbo" format that we need to start spewing hate and violence?
The FCC depends on reports or filings by local broadcasters and interested parties to initiate an investigation.

I have seen no indication that either of those companies or any other broadcaster has initiated any action to verify illegal operation of the station. In any case, the first step would be a filing of illegal operation of a translator without an originating station.

In any case, as I said in another response, the FCC seldom today initiates an investigation. The investigation procedure is almost always dependent on local broadcasters or interested parties filing an objection with the FCC. The FCC then verifies and takes action.
 
Wow! Some folks take matters into their own hands. Is Entercom & Univision really that scared of a lil Transalator Broadcasting a "cazuela/gumbo" format that we need to start spewing hate and violence?
Why is informing the FCC of an illegal operation (no originating HD channel or AM station) and the possibility of excess power output being scared? As a broadcaster, I expect my competitors to follow the same rules I observe, and if there is evidence that they don't, I'd file with the FCC with a description of the offense(s).

That is how the system has worked for decades.
 
Yeah, putting on a mask and unlawfully going to parts of a broadcast site you have no business to be, opening up transmitter cabinets, and taking pictures. Was it you?
That´s simply trespassing, unless the site has a common transmitter room... in which case the person could be from another authorized user.

In any case, going to the site is useless. The real issue is the totally and absolutely illegal operation with no originating HD or AM signal. Going to the transmitter site does not contribute to reporting that violation of the rules with an illegal operation.
 
David, Just a few days ago President Trump's words and tweets were taken out of context from a broad statement. Many people understood GO ATTACK Capitol Hill. Some were carrying symbols and flags strongly associated with particular ideas and factions. Today President Trump made history as the only US president to be impeached twice. Many times we all forget the power this site has. I understand you perfectly when you say "have an engineer with FM field strength measurement equipment conduct a signal strength", some schmuck understood the opposite. A legal complaint to be taken serious at the FCC should come from KXXF 105.3 fm or KTWL 105.3 fm along with the HD channel situation. I really doubt the new owners of K287BQ don't have a plan to originate programming from.
 
David, Just a few days ago President Trump's words and tweets were taken out of context from a broad statement. Many people understood GO ATTACK Capitol Hill. Some were carrying symbols and flags strongly associated with particular ideas and factions. Today President Trump made history as the only US president to be impeached twice. Many times we all forget the power this site has. I understand you perfectly when you say "have an engineer with FM field strength measurement equipment conduct a signal strength", some schmuck understood the opposite. A legal complaint to be taken serious at the FCC should come from KXXF 105.3 fm or KTWL 105.3 fm along with the HD channel situation. I really doubt the new owners of K287BQ don't have a plan to originate programming from.
KTWL won’t complain about it, they’re owned by the same company
 
A lot of good people worked to make this happen.
Somehow I doubt "good people" would break FCC rules like they apparently are doing... Because you posted pics of the transmitter vandalism it seems like you're working with them, so maybe I answered my own question about where you got the pics. Unless they shared pics with the outside world.
 
Somehow I doubt "good people" would break FCC rules like they apparently are doing... You sound like you're working with them, so maybe I answered my own question about where you got the pics.
I thought the same thing. Collaborating with a person who is breaking the law in this case makes that person a criminal as well... just like the driver of the getaway car is just as guilty of a bank robbery as the hold-up perpetrators.
 
K27BQ cannot translate KTWL, even an HD subcarrier of KTWL -- the coverage areas do not overlap, and of course, it is on the same channel allocation. And K287BQ is *definitely* over power -- it is coming in perfectly, with stereo pilot, in the city of Conroe - well outside of even the 40dBu contour, drowning out KTWL.

More shady nonsense going on. Shocker.
 
I thought this blog would be a good place to discuss radio stuff with knowledgeable individuals. Instead, I find a bunch of wanna be radio police who think they know everything. You need to understand that 92.5 and 105.3 are no longer associated with Pastor Guavara. These stations are no longer broadcasting from wrong locations. They are not overpowered, either.

The operation has been taken over by a 30-year broadcasting veteran who flipped Houston's most beloved (but at the time going broke) rock station into one of the most successful (and profitable) Spanish radio stations ever. Yes, the Big Boys at Estrella, Entercom, and Univision are worried about losing listeners They are scrambling, strategizing, having meetings, snooping, taking pictures, making calls, pulling favors, etc. They don't want competition, especially not from a low power translator with a fraction of their operational costs.

The fact of the matter is that K287BQ does not have to electronically file notice of what station is being rebroadcast. K287BQ simply has to mail notice to the FCC. See below. For what it's worth, KTWL is awaiting receipt of a new Nautel IBOC module. Do the translators of daytime only AMs cut off at night? No. Are FM translators required to only repeat the "over the air" feed of the station they are repeating? No. Just because the primary for K287BQ is currently having technical difficulties doesn't require the translator to be silenced. As long as K287BQ has notified the FCC of its proposed primary, until and unless the FCC says no go, it is in fact a go. And on these required mail in notices, the FCC often takes months to review them, if they even bother at all. It is sometimes a year or more before they actually update their website to show the correct information about what station is being repeated.

If a translator changes it's HD channel provider and the provider is unable to initiate the provision of HD services, the translator can not operate without such service. One thing is a very temporary inability for an AM or HD channel to broadcast (Act of God, etc.) during which interval the translator may operate. But losing the original HD or AM provider and then negotiating with another without even an operating HD channel is not likely to be a sustainable argument at the FCC.

As also posted here, the station being used to originate the HD is not a legitimate and legal source for this translator as the coverage areas don't match and are not legal for translator origination/repeating.-

The "beloved" rock station was not "going broke" as it was owned by CBS which was hardly teetering at the edge of bankruptcy. They simply saw that the Hispanic-targeted possibilities were greater than the rock ones and made a format switch. They did not get real salable success until they brought in Tony Luna from New York (and my formidable competitor in Puerto Rico) and redefined the mix, presentation and even rotations on the station.

But even if the FCC excuses the very improper procedural actions by the licensee of the translator, the format absolutely fails to meet any measure of credibility. It has songs that are sure to offend the listeners that like other songs, and it can't go for more than three songs without a total train-wreck... similar to the earliest days of the CBS effort but much worse.

All, of course, being a moot point: it covers less than 200,000 persons in the 60 dbu in a market of over 7 million. That is my definition of a gnat in a hurricane.
 
K27BQ cannot translate KTWL, even an HD subcarrier of KTWL -- the coverage areas do not overlap, and of course, it is on the same channel allocation. And K287BQ is *definitely* over power -- it is coming in perfectly, with stereo pilot, in the city of Conroe - well outside of even the 40dBu contour, drowning out KTWL.

More shady nonsense going on. Shocker.
You just don't get it do you? Until and unless the FCC rejects the proposal it can...
 
If a translator changes it's HD channel provider and the provider is unable to initiate the provision of HD services, the translator can not operate without such service. One thing is a very temporary inability for an AM or HD channel to broadcast (Act of God, etc.) during which interval the translator may operate. But losing the original HD or AM provider and then negotiating with another without even an operating HD channel is not likely to be a sustainable argument at the FCC.

As also posted here, the station being used to originate the HD is not a legitimate and legal source for this translator as the coverage areas don't match and are not legal for translator origination/repeating.-

The "beloved" rock station was not "going broke" as it was owned by CBS which was hardly teetering at the edge of bankruptcy. They simply saw that the Hispanic-targeted possibilities were greater than the rock ones and made a format switch. They did not get real salable success until they brought in Tony Luna from New York (and my formidable competitor in Puerto Rico) and redefined the mix, presentation and even rotations on the station.

But even if the FCC excuses the very improper procedural actions by the licensee of the translator, the format absolutely fails to meet any measure of credibility. It has songs that are sure to offend the listeners that like other songs, and it can't go for more than three songs without a total train-wreck... similar to the earliest days of the CBS effort but much worse.

All, of course, being a moot point: it covers less than 200,000 persons in the 60 dbu in a market of over 7 million. That is my definition of a gnat in a hurric
 
Last edited:
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom