scooterodell said:VOR -
Music rotation and library depth aren't really money issues. What do you mean by "the right way or the cheap way"?
Music rotation and library depth are money issues because if the station continues to play the same songs on a continuous basis, the station will experience an erosion in audience, thus impacting future rating books and make it tougher for your sales department to make money. Ad agencies look for trends.
The "right way" is to look towards the future; not next year but five years down the road. Think about expanding not only Legends play list but also trying to lure some popular name talent to your station. ( Excuse me if I'm wrong but I believe you work for Legends in some capacity, and I correct?)
Perhaps "cheap" was too harsh of a word, but what I meant was that while Legends does have some full-time staff, I believe the majority of your on-air talent is made up of part-time or casual employees; am I correct?
It's always great to have good part-time help, but it's has been my experience that stations who employ mostly part-time people do so in order to avoid having to pay for medical or other insurance. What I am suggesting, again, is for Crawford to spend a few extra dollars by hiring some good local talent....full-time.....even if they have to work a Saturday shift. Maybe you don't need a morning drive team, but you sure do need a news presence, especially if you are going for an older audience.
If you want to compete against the big-boys,( Clear Channel & Entercom) Crawford is going to have to spend some money. The question is do you want to spend money hiring on-air talent that will attract a larger audience, or find someone to sell what you're currently offering?