• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

LPFM forum

I'm happy to see this. It's an interesting area of radio and I'm looking forward to reading and taking part in more discussions around the subject - it's good that the forum has been moved out of the forum "graveyard".
 
I'm happy to see this. It's an interesting area of radio and I'm looking forward to reading and taking part in more discussions around the subject - it's good that the forum has been moved out of the forum "graveyard".
And now we welcome the esteemed and knowledgeable Michi as a new moderator, focusing on this area!
 
Question. Should I rename the LPFM forum LPFM and Translators?
That's a tough one. LPFM is definitely a thing on its own, and so are translators, but they have similar coverage areas. Right now, the LPFM forum looks pretty good where it's at.
 
Last edited:
Question. Should I rename the LPFM forum LPFM and Translators?
Debatable. I think the major distinctions are coverage and commercial status.

Translators can still be 250 watts at 3,000 feet... check out the ABQ ones! LPFMs are vastly more limited, and they can't run commercials.

I think that those two distinctions make for two separate subjects.

And I'm interested in knowing how LPFMs use streaming to enhance coverage on the local scene.

(Of course, the interesting future subject concerns divorcing translators from AMs and allowing the Ancient Modulation stations to be eliminated)
 
Last edited:
Sorry about my spelling errors, I have since corrected them, LOL
 
I think that those two distinctions make for two separate subjects.
I agree they should be. The LPFM group should be expanded to LPFM and Noncommercial Educational Stations. This is because many questions that come in other forums relate to the noncommercial nature of LPFM and NCE stations and the same policies apply to both.
(Of course, the interesting future subject concerns divorcing translators from AMs and allowing the Ancient Modulation stations to be eliminated)
That will never happen because of Section 5(3) of the Local Community Radio Act of 2010 as there would be an expectation that these translators would become a primary service. It would also raise a ton of §307(b) issues around fair distribution and community coverage. It also raises issues around "fill-in" service as if the underlying AM station was to disappear, there would be no reference to base fill-in service on and many fill-in translators would see a drastic loss in coverage if transitioned to the "non-fill in" rules. It could also migrate into a discussion of commercial LPFM stations, which has been a long dead horse issue.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom