Some great commentary on TV coverage of the Hamlin story by the Buffalo News reporter Alan Pergament:
and still others like The People's CDC might blame long covidAnd the anti-vaxxers are out in force. “see? He collapsed because of the clot shot! Stop the vaxxes and let COVID spread completely uncontrolled!”
It seems like many of the current pro football generation players have been paying attention to what's happened to those who came before them. Permanent neurological disease caused by traumatic brain injuries and a subsequent high rate of suicide have caused today's players to rightfully look toward their personal future. Seeing one of their peers/colleagues essentially drop dead on the field on national TV hammers home the potential danger of the game that much more.You can see it from their faces. They were horrified at what they saw. They were in no condition to play after that experience.
It made me wonder if that's something unique to this generation of players, given the way they were raised, coupled with the strength of the players union.
I know there are some politicians that made that claim in the past 3 years but the mother of a deceased student athlete came forward and said her son died from a previously unrecognized heart defect and it was before COVID-19 was even reported.And the anti-vaxxers are out in force. “see? He collapsed because of the clot shot! Stop the vaxxes and let COVID spread completely uncontrolled!”
Jake West was a seemingly healthy 17-year-old when he collapsed during high school football practice in Indiana and died of sudden cardiac arrest. A video widely shared online falsely suggests COVID-19 vaccination is to blame, weaving headlines about him into a rapid-fire compilation of news coverage about athletes collapsing.
The vaccine played no role in West’s death — he died from an undiagnosed heart condition in 2013, seven years before the pandemic began.
The video is just one example of many similar compilations circulating on the internet that use deceptive tactics to link vaccines to a supposed wave of deaths and illness among the healthiest people, often athletes, a claim for which medical experts say there is no supporting evidence.
The clips inundate viewers with a barrage of stories and headlines delivered without context, some translated from other languages and offering few details people can check on their own.
I just heard on Fox 8 that the game has playoff implications, so apparently it needs to be finished.
As for the AFC, the Buffalo Bills clinch homefield with a win over the Cincinnati Bengals to conclude NFL Week 17 on Monday Night Football (that game was suspended) and a win over the New England Patriots in Week 18.
The Kansas City Chiefs get that top seed with a win at the Las Vegas Raiders and with a Bills loss to the Bengals or Patriots.
The Bengals would be the No. 1 AFC postseason seed with a win over the Bills on Monday Night Football in Week 17 and a Week 18 win over the Baltimore Ravens, combined with a Chiefs loss to the Raiders.
Whatever would have happened Monday night had the game been played to a finish would have also affected the AFC wild card race. New England needs to beat Buffalo in Week 18 to get in. If Cincinnati were to have beaten the Bills in Week 17, Buffalo's coach might have decided to play second and third stringers in place of the Bills' key starters against the Pats, accepting a lower overall seed while insuring that the players that matter most have no chance of being injured before the playoffs start. Not knowing when or if Bills-Bengals will be restarted/replayed now means the Bills must play their regulars in a do-or-die game against a desperate New England team, Will they then be forced to come back on short rest vs. the Bengals -- further risking injury to players in a game the players likely want no part of at this point -- just to fulfill their obligation to league/ticketholders/television/FanDuel/Corporate America?That is correct, especially with regards to Cincinnati.
It's a very unusual situation. It's clear that stopping the game was the right decision. I wonder though if the same medical emergency had happened to one of the referees on the field if the game continues? It's a tough subject. Hopefully, Hamlin makes a full recovery.Whatever would have happened Monday night had the game been played to a finish would have also affected the AFC wild card race. New England needs to beat Buffalo in Week 18 to get in. If Cincinnati were to have beaten the Bills in Week 17, Buffalo's coach might have decided to play second and third stringers in place of the Bills' key starters against the Pats, accepting a lower overall seed while insuring that the players that matter most have no chance of being injured before the playoffs start. Not knowing when or if Bills-Bengals will be restarted/replayed now means the Bills must play their regulars in a do-or-die game against a desperate New England team, Will they then be forced to come back on short rest vs. the Bengals -- further risking injury to players in a game the players likely want no part of at this point -- just to fulfill their obligation to league/ticketholders/television/FanDuel/Corporate America?
The ump was John McSherry, who weighed close to 400 pounds. He collapsed seven pitches into the game. His fellow umpires, very understandably, were in no frame of mind to continue at that point and the players supported their decision. The only controversy was sparked by Reds owner Marge Schott, who was politically incorrect well before that term was coined. From Wikipedia:During the 2020 COVID season, contingencies and procedures were put in place in case some teams had games cancelled due to outbreaks. Maybe they need to refer to them. I couldn’t tell you what would happen with the roof, but I mentioned above that the opening Cincinnati Reds game in 1996 saw the death of an empire on the field, literally at first pitch. They did cancel the game, and make it up. It was a controversial decision at the time.
The NFL's stance was "Every game must be played". They rescheduled and moved many games during the 2020 season due to players testing positive. This situation is different because it's late in the season. The only option to play the Buffalo vs Cincinnati game is by pushing back the playoffs by one week. That would require only one week between the Championship games and the Super Bowl (instead of 2). That's an option, but the NFL doesn't seem ready to do that. They may just cancel the game and decide the playoff seeding positions by coin flip or some other way...During the 2020 COVID season, contingencies and procedures were put in place in case some teams had games cancelled due to outbreaks. Maybe they need to refer to them.
So, what do you think would happen to the Pro Bowl Games, which is scheduled for February 5, the Sunday between the conference championship games and the Super Bowl?The NFL's stance was "Every game must be played". They rescheduled and moved many games during the 2020 season due to players testing positive. This situation is different because it's late in the season. The only option to play the Buffalo vs Cincinnati game is by pushing back the playoffs by one week. That would require only one week between the Championship games and the Super Bowl (instead of 2). That's an option, but the NFL doesn't seem ready to do that. They may just cancel the game and decide the playoff seeding positions by coin flip or some other way...
The Pro Bowl is very low priority and many fans don't care about it at all. For many years it was played after the Super Bowl. Players got a free trip to Hawaii.So, what do you think would happen to the Pro Bowl Games, which is scheduled for February 5, the Sunday between the conference championship games and the Super Bowl?
Canceled due to lack of interest?So, what do you think would happen to the Pro Bowl Games, which is scheduled for February 5, the Sunday between the conference championship games and the Super Bowl?
The NFL's silence is an indication to me of just how much money is involved in the play/don't play decision. There is no easy way out. Perhaps the worst-case scenario is this:The Pro Bowl is very low priority and many fans don't care about it at all. For many years it was played after the Super Bowl. Players got a free trip to Hawaii.
If Cincinnati beats Baltimore this week, they win the division. The NFL may wait for that outcome and then decide whether to play the Bills vs Bengals game. Nobody seems to know right now...
The Pro Bowl is very low priority and many fans don't care about it at all.
I figured as much. It has been many years since the last time I watched the Pro Bowl.Canceled due to lack of interest?![]()
With players from the two Super Bowl teams not being allowed to play, there is even less interest than there was when it was after the SB. It's far and away the most useless all-star game in the four major pro sports, as far as fan and player interest is concerned.I figured as much. It has been many years since the last time I watched the Pro Bowl.
I can remember when the Pro Bowl ran after the week after the Super BowlSo, what do you think would happen to the Pro Bowl Games, which is scheduled for February 5, the Sunday between the conference championship games and the Super Bowl?