PhillyWatch said:
It blows my mind that anyone can, even in half sincerity, be suggesting syndicated fare.
really guys?
Have you heard the 'local' show on IQ yet? Syndication would be better by a long shot. Even with competent local hosts, I find that the local content of value to me is generally the traffic, weather and maybe the news headlines. And KYW handles the news just fine. More detailed traffic information, especially for the surrounding suburbs, would be most welcomed.
Most 'local' talk shows discuss national issues most of the time anyway. Dom Giordano is one of the better 'local' hosts still on the air, and the majority of his issues are national or regional with the 'local' take on those issues. Most suburban listeners don't necessarily care what's going on in Philly outside of sports. IQ has to decide who they're going after. If they want to mix politics with squishy 'relationship' shows, that's really two separate audiences with very little overlap unless they select the political shows by their appeal to women.
It can be done, and with the almost complete lack of terrestrial competition, the field is ripe for some success, but if the identity/brand is muddled, audiences may be turned off. There are plenty of non-terrestrial sources from which to consume talk and entertainment programming today. If people are confused about what IQ is, they may not make a habit of tuning into the FM frequency when they know they can get what they want via the internet or satellite.
Pab Sungenis said:
Radio Wreck said:
They should pick up Clear Channel's Quinn & Rose in AM drive
Why? Jim Quinn is a psychotic warmonger, much much worse than any other syndicated talk show host on the air.
If you're going to go for Conservative Talk, which hasn't been a money maker in Philly for years, you might as well go all the way. The only reason to program that format in a market like this is political promotion not profit-making.
Unless you're a dollar-a-holler shop, radio isn't programmed for promotion, it's programmed to sell ads profitably. Issues talk can be hard to sell what with many national advertisers apparently more afraid of controversy than reaching a dedicated intelligent audience. I sit and listen to ads for slip and fall lawyers, testosterone pills and whatever the government is pushing through the Ad Council all day and have no idea what's going on with car dealers, Home Depot and Verizon to list a few top advertisers. That seems short-sighted to me. And these short-lived 'boycotts' are mainly promoted by ideological groups who never listen to the shows they target anyway. The audiences of these shows are fiercely loyal, and they don't give a rat's ass about manufactured boycott movements. After years of watching this play out repeatedly with little to no ratings impact to the targeted shows, you'd think advertisers would have figured this out by now.
Are the ratings really that low for the top political talk hosts in Philly? Why would 1210 have stuck with it for a decade? Maybe Premiere's fee structure wasn't worth what they're now charging, but these shows do reasonably well in most markets where they have a decent signal and are promoted. Is Philly really all that different, or have the approaches to talk been half hearted since WWDB threw in the towel due to costs and aging demos in a time of big debt service?
Merlin has a prime opportunity with a good marketwide FM signal, the pick of the top talk hosts and no competition to speak of. If they don't want to get serious about a morning show, they could do a lot worse than the energetic topical Quinn and Rose. Most politically driven talk is national and occasionally regional. But a good syndicated host beats a bad local host every time. And what IQ has right now in AM drive is just plain bad.