How interesting that when Gator joined the Jax pack giving us 3 country stations, the many voices on this board who now praise/approve the decision to flip 100.7 to the #3 country format are the very ones who called for Rooster to call it quits ASAP. Look, it’s obvious there are Renda employees/on-air talent who post here and I’ve had most of you figured out long before because, well, I’m just a perceptive kind of guy. It is what is, company loyalty is not a bad thing but hopefully I’ll try to bring some voice of reason to this discussion as I usually try to do since I have no stake in the outcome.
Given the lack of promotion, marketing and dollars for on-air talent that will probably be the same strategy used before, how can anyone expect the outcome to be different than everything else tried there? At best if they duplicate Rooster's "success," they will still be an also-ran station that I feel should be marketed more for Brunswick then Jax anyway. I wouldn't get excited, Pocket, by any of this stuff because it's just business as usual crap.
Here's a different take. When I read the T.U. the other day, I reflected on Gary Spurgeon's comment about recognizing a hole in the market and filling it with the country legends format. How nice if we are changing our ways of doing business and bringing in formats that better reflect the diversity of the community served that even spans older demos. Maybe the average listener will think this was a good thing, but here we know better. It's all silly little games of weakening one station and strengthening another with very little regard for the listener. If another format du jour comes along next year that will better serve the company, country legends and whatever listeners attracted would be told to take a hike. A.J. Davis was right when he said we get it backwards putting the listener last.
Pocket, I enjoyed reading the history of 100.7 and I can appreciate your passion and in fact, I do enjoy many of your posts. But I can't let your comments about old people and oldies remain as is without a response.
Actually, IMHO, Renda Broadcasting's bringing back oldies and the WKQL calls wasn't as stupid as one would think. It's very easy to generalize but given the station signal limitations, the loyalty of oldies listeners and the great talent pool that found itself displaced, the new WKQL could have been something. It could have evolved into a really good 60s, 70s and 80s station. While the signal limitations would have kept it from being Top 5, they could have been in a good poistion today but they blew it. In many markets the dominant AC in the cluster often had an oldies sister. Advertising is often sold as a package for both stations and the older demo appeal of oldies back then, particularly in woman could have been a bonus for WEJZ. We all know they went the cheap route and that's why the station failed. Don't blame old people listening to it. It wasn't programmed right to attract younger demos and it can be done but I'm tired of preaching to a brick wall here.
I've come to the conclusion the G.M's and the ownership can say anything they want but they all talk out of 3 sides of their mouth. These guys can break statistics and research down to anything that fits what they want or don't want to do. If there is any bright spot at all at 100.7, it's that country fans who may be a little gray in the temples have a place to call home. I only wish this appearance of listener inclusion wasn't limited to country. The peeing contests the big boys get into just jockying for position in their minds is what is so wrong with radio and the small town thinking that is Jacksonville radio. I often wonder, do any of these people get into the community they serve and look at the listener pool? I can see it now, those driving down I-95 from other places who hit their scan button will come up with 3 country stations - one right after another. Then all the jukeboxes and sweeper city and the progressive talk mess. Eegads, what a place.