Fieldtech1 said:Given the 2 sets of side marker lights i'd estimate it to be in the 300-350' range.
Good point, Fieldtech. Now I don't know what to think. It would help to know the face size.
Fieldtech1 said:Given the 2 sets of side marker lights i'd estimate it to be in the 300-350' range.
Goooooogle Earth shows:
37° 53' 07.86" N
(-)100° 36' 39.098" W
Tell me what you get.
Us Florida boys had to think about that for a second, what the hell is an ice shield? :DTV-Chief said:I was wondering why only the lowest dish had an ice shield.
Good question Chief. Our ice storms are typically freezing rain (Hail is a different animal). The damage happens when the tower is shedding the ice it collected during the event. Hence, the upper level appurtenances don't need shields.DTV-Chief said:I was wondering why only the lowest dish had an ice shield.
Yup! But we sure need them further down the tower! Here in OKC there are several people that have missed that important step on FM bays and learned the hard way.
Oh yeah! That's kind of a dangerous place when the ice is falling for sure!
The most un natural event on an FAA tower is a turnstyle FM antenna.
ChiefEngineer said:The most un natural event on an FAA tower is a turnstyle FM antenna. Seeing the FAA on a tower with a circular set of FM bays is almost an oxymoron.
w9wi said:Remember the NCE-FM/TV-6 thing? Where a non-commercial FM station can reduce interference to a channel 6 TV station by co-locating the FM antenna with the TV antenna?
If the problem is a FM signal, much stronger than the airnav signal, swamping the airnav receivers, then maybe co-siting the FM station with the airnav transmitter might help the problem?