Hmmmm....what might this one be?
http://www.radiotvdeals.com/m8/544--tennessee-nashville-area-fm.html
http://www.radiotvdeals.com/m8/544--tennessee-nashville-area-fm.html
NashvilleNative said:Hmm...WFFI, WNFN, or the new 94.5 move in? Snatch that puppy up Cromwell.
NashvilleNative said:I didn't realize WRLT was a class A with such little wattage, but I was wondering that, but didn't look. Is there a chance they could be talking about WANT? If so they're stretching it to say Nashville.
Tibbs2 said:94.5 - con-firmed
You probably don't need to worry about WNQM themselves doing that. They got "scooped" by Bott when it came to getting a signal on the FM dial. WNQM and WWCR didn't even start broadcasting online until sometime after George McClintock left.anotherguy said:I just hope that if it's to a Christian group that it doesn't turn out to be a dollar a holler outfit that would be the FM equivalent of WNQM.![]()
jetfli said:Long-coveted local (as opposed to KY) signal for WNSR?
firepoint525 said:You probably don't need to worry about WNQM themselves doing that. They got "scooped" by Bott when it came to getting a signal on the FM dial. WNQM and WWCR didn't even start broadcasting online until sometime after George McClintock left.anotherguy said:I just hope that if it's to a Christian group that it doesn't turn out to be a dollar a holler outfit that would be the FM equivalent of WNQM.![]()
romer979fm said:jetfli said:Long-coveted local (as opposed to KY) signal for WNSR?
that 103.9 frequency was always just a bad joke...but...94.5 would make sense for WNSR