New PD of which station? This thread has been discussing several.Did you see who the new PD is.. a good buddy of yours DAVID
New PD of which station? This thread has been discussing several.Did you see who the new PD is.. a good buddy of yours DAVID
The usable signal using a relaxed 10 mV/m (the ITU says you need 15 mV/m in metro areas) covers just 40% of the market daytime and less than 30% at night.You guys seem to really not cheer for the little man but I have always lived in Houston or Texas and i can't remember 920 ever not being a station I could pick up.
No station has "cero" overhead. Utilities, music licenses (even for talk stations), offices, real estate for the transmitter, property taxes, business licenses, FCC fees, legal, accounting, office staff, furniture, computers, engineering, Internet access, equipment maintenance, business and programming software fees, insurance, etc., etc., mount up in an expensive metro area.They own the station and have Cero overhead
Univision is now part of Televisa. Jorge Ramos was fired by Televisa from XEW/XEQ and Televisa San Angel for not following company policy many years ago. Comparing the Perenchio and, later, Saban eras of Univision with today's Televisa ownership just doesn't work.I'm sure someone on the conservative side would love to get on a mic and pay for it. A new report came out today on How Univision has changed the way they portray Trump heads are starting to roll for those that don't get in line with the new Views. A company I have spent half my career with but suddenly has changed its political view.
Was Kevin Adell in the photo? If so, that may explain WFDF's sudden turn a couple months ago.No. He posted a photo of himself among a small group with Trump in the background. Velasquez is wearing a red hat that says "Make Radio Great Again." Within a week of that post, he announced the format change. What conclusion can you draw from that?
Nope. The interview was done by the lead Televisa reporter/anchor in Mexico City; he is still very much part of Televisa. It's important to note that Televisa alone, without Univision, is the much larger entity, with international standings on a variety of metrics being much larger than CBS, ABC or NBC.From what I understand, a Univision reporter who gave Trump a softball interview a day or two ago is out.
The Televisa policy is to be more centrist and friendly to all parties... despite many decades of parcialization towards the PRI. Univision, going back to the Perenchio and Saban eras, was closer to the farthest left of the Dekmocratic party than being "centrist".As David has mentioned, I don't know how much point Univision has in pursuing politics anyway.
It's pretty much the norm that first generation Hispanics have Spanish as their principal language and, overwhelmingly, the one they think in. The second generation speaks Spanish with their parents, but English with everyone else. First generation Hispanics have a relatively low percentage of U.S. citizenship and, thus, fewer of them vote.Maybe more Spanish-dominant viewers vote than radio listeners, though. I've mentioned several times that I have two Latina nieces. They were born in St. Louis and don't watch Univision. They don't listen to Spanish-language radio either. The older one speaks decent Spanish, though I wouldn't necessarily call her fluent, while the younger one barely speaks it at all.
There's a difference between being able to pick it up and finding it listenable. The signal is also a lot better in the daytime than at night.
Noise levels in metro areas have increased dramatically in the last 35 years since then. A 2.5 mV/m signal was usable back then on AM. Today, the ITU says 15 mV/m is required to overcome noise. In general, the usable urban area coverage of AM stations has been reduced by about 2/3 in those years.You can judge for yourself. I made this recording of half an hour of KYST in April 1986. Receiving location was near Westheimer and Woodhead in the Montrose neighborhood of Houston. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file_premium/u5zl0oegutaw92j/KYST.April1986.mp3/file
From what I understand, a Univision reporter who gave Trump a softball interview a day or two ago is out.
Not even in the same country. The interview was done by a Televisa México anchor, while the guy who quit is a Univision USA former employee.Not the same person:
And since TelevisaUnivision in the US no longer owns any AM stations, there is nowhere such an interview would have been broadcast.Note that the Trump interview was in English and on TV. The anchor who resigned is also on TV, not radio.
new pd or better yet the first pd for Latino Media NetworkNew PD of which station? This thread has been discussing several.
Considering that their own website has no releases since June of this year, and almost all the stations they own are worthless, this is not a significant news item.new pd or better yet the first pd for Latino Media Network
Worthless is harsh. yet you applied for the position?Considering that their own website has no releases since June of this year, and almost all the stations they own are worthless, this is not a significant news item.
"Made it seem" is your interpretation.
You can't claim your statement was up for interpretation when you stated it as a fact. You called it a "meeting"....the president of the station attended a private function with former president Trump, and was convinced by that meeting...
KYST went CHR on June 14, 1982 and was programmed by Clay Gish.I seem to remember 920 ran a very well-programmed Top-40 format around 40 years ago. Even then, it didn't do all that well in the Houston market. It did, however, do well enough to get a few people noticed, and I'm thinking some of them got hired by KRBE and KKBQ.

You can't claim your statement was up for interpretation when you stated it as a fact. You called it a "meeting".
An assembly of people, especially the members of a society or committee, for discussion or entertainment
IIRC, I think David did mention that he applied mostly in jest. It wasn't a completely serious inquiry.Worthless is harsh. yet you applied for the position?
I applied for the COO or CEO position, just to see if they would respond. They never did, proving my point.Worthless is harsh. yet you applied for the position?
And it was for the CEO position, for which I have decades of group ownership and management successful experience. As I said before, I knew they would not consider a radio pro as they are totally politically motivated.IIRC, I think David did mention that he applied mostly in jest. It wasn't a completely serious inquiry.
You can try to walk back your text with technicalities. But you said what you said. These mental gymnastics are truly unnecessary if all you did was clarify that your statement was meant as an opinion and not a fact.Here's the definition of the word "meeting"
It was about as public as a Costco. If you could have afforded it, you could have attended it.That's what this was. It was private, not one of his public rallies.
And that "meeting" in itself convinced him that he needed to change KYST-AM???I'm not here to defend or argue about someone else's Facebook post. He attended a meeting, or gathering, or assembly, or whatever word you wish to use.
And that "meeting" in itself convinced him that he needed to change KYST-AM???
The connection made to an "upcoming" business move does not = he was convinced at that "meeting".Did you read the link? He makes the connection directly. So yes. Attending that event "ties into an upcoming business move," which we now know was this format change. Read what HE said.