• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

NEW CONSERVATIVE TALK STATION

Status
Not open for further replies.
You guys seem to really not cheer for the little man but I have always lived in Houston or Texas and i can't remember 920 ever not being a station I could pick up.
The usable signal using a relaxed 10 mV/m (the ITU says you need 15 mV/m in metro areas) covers just 40% of the market daytime and less than 30% at night.
They own the station and have Cero overhead
No station has "cero" overhead. Utilities, music licenses (even for talk stations), offices, real estate for the transmitter, property taxes, business licenses, FCC fees, legal, accounting, office staff, furniture, computers, engineering, Internet access, equipment maintenance, business and programming software fees, insurance, etc., etc., mount up in an expensive metro area.
I'm sure someone on the conservative side would love to get on a mic and pay for it. A new report came out today on How Univision has changed the way they portray Trump heads are starting to roll for those that don't get in line with the new Views. A company I have spent half my career with but suddenly has changed its political view.
Univision is now part of Televisa. Jorge Ramos was fired by Televisa from XEW/XEQ and Televisa San Angel for not following company policy many years ago. Comparing the Perenchio and, later, Saban eras of Univision with today's Televisa ownership just doesn't work.
 
Last edited:
No. He posted a photo of himself among a small group with Trump in the background. Velasquez is wearing a red hat that says "Make Radio Great Again." Within a week of that post, he announced the format change. What conclusion can you draw from that?
Was Kevin Adell in the photo? If so, that may explain WFDF's sudden turn a couple months ago.
 
From what I understand, a Univision reporter who gave Trump a softball interview a day or two ago is out.
Nope. The interview was done by the lead Televisa reporter/anchor in Mexico City; he is still very much part of Televisa. It's important to note that Televisa alone, without Univision, is the much larger entity, with international standings on a variety of metrics being much larger than CBS, ABC or NBC.

The Univision policy is so changed that they did not even allow the Democratic party to buy ads in the commercial breaks during the interview. That was a corporate decision of the highest sort.
As David has mentioned, I don't know how much point Univision has in pursuing politics anyway.
The Televisa policy is to be more centrist and friendly to all parties... despite many decades of parcialization towards the PRI. Univision, going back to the Perenchio and Saban eras, was closer to the farthest left of the Dekmocratic party than being "centrist".
Maybe more Spanish-dominant viewers vote than radio listeners, though. I've mentioned several times that I have two Latina nieces. They were born in St. Louis and don't watch Univision. They don't listen to Spanish-language radio either. The older one speaks decent Spanish, though I wouldn't necessarily call her fluent, while the younger one barely speaks it at all.
It's pretty much the norm that first generation Hispanics have Spanish as their principal language and, overwhelmingly, the one they think in. The second generation speaks Spanish with their parents, but English with everyone else. First generation Hispanics have a relatively low percentage of U.S. citizenship and, thus, fewer of them vote.
 
Last edited:
You can judge for yourself. I made this recording of half an hour of KYST in April 1986. Receiving location was near Westheimer and Woodhead in the Montrose neighborhood of Houston. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file_premium/u5zl0oegutaw92j/KYST.April1986.mp3/file
Noise levels in metro areas have increased dramatically in the last 35 years since then. A 2.5 mV/m signal was usable back then on AM. Today, the ITU says 15 mV/m is required to overcome noise. In general, the usable urban area coverage of AM stations has been reduced by about 2/3 in those years.
 
From what I understand, a Univision reporter who gave Trump a softball interview a day or two ago is out.

Not the same person:


Note that the Trump interview was in English and on TV. The anchor who resigned is also on TV, not radio.
 
Last edited:
Not the same person:
Not even in the same country. The interview was done by a Televisa México anchor, while the guy who quit is a Univision USA former employee.
Note that the Trump interview was in English and on TV. The anchor who resigned is also on TV, not radio.
And since TelevisaUnivision in the US no longer owns any AM stations, there is nowhere such an interview would have been broadcast.
 
new pd or better yet the first pd for Latino Media Network
Considering that their own website has no releases since June of this year, and almost all the stations they own are worthless, this is not a significant news item.
 
I seem to remember 920 ran a very well-programmed Top-40 format around 40 years ago. Even then, it didn't do all that well in the Houston market. It did, however, do well enough to get a few people noticed, and I'm thinking some of them got hired by KRBE and KKBQ.
KYST went CHR on June 14, 1982 and was programmed by Clay Gish.
KKBQ (79Q) made the switch just a couple of weeks later.

79Q debuted with a 2.1 and then jumped to a 5.3 before 93Q joined in and sounded the death knell for CHR on AM in Houston.
KYST went 0.3 to 0.5 and didn't even show in the Winter '83 book. It only lasted 11 months as a CHR, and flipped to the all-Beatles format on May 1, 1983 before going Spanish Contemporary that fall.

1700183137816.png
 
You can't claim your statement was up for interpretation when you stated it as a fact. You called it a "meeting".

Here's the definition of the word "meeting"

An assembly of people, especially the members of a society or committee, for discussion or entertainment

That's what this was. It was private, not one of his public rallies.

I'm not here to defend or argue about someone else's Facebook post. He attended a meeting, or gathering, or assembly, or whatever word you wish to use.

 
Worthless is harsh. yet you applied for the position?
I applied for the COO or CEO position, just to see if they would respond. They never did, proving my point.
 
IIRC, I think David did mention that he applied mostly in jest. It wasn't a completely serious inquiry.
And it was for the CEO position, for which I have decades of group ownership and management successful experience. As I said before, I knew they would not consider a radio pro as they are totally politically motivated.
 
Last edited:
Here's the definition of the word "meeting"
You can try to walk back your text with technicalities. But you said what you said. These mental gymnastics are truly unnecessary if all you did was clarify that your statement was meant as an opinion and not a fact.
That's what this was. It was private, not one of his public rallies.
It was about as public as a Costco. If you could have afforded it, you could have attended it.
I'm not here to defend or argue about someone else's Facebook post. He attended a meeting, or gathering, or assembly, or whatever word you wish to use.
And that "meeting" in itself convinced him that he needed to change KYST-AM???

The more probable of guesses (and not an assumption presented as a fact) is that after the patriarch's passing, Matt decided to take the station in a different direction.
 
And that "meeting" in itself convinced him that he needed to change KYST-AM???

Did you read the link? He makes the connection directly. So yes. Attending that event "ties into an upcoming business move," which we now know was this format change. Read what HE said.
 
Did you read the link? He makes the connection directly. So yes. Attending that event "ties into an upcoming business move," which we now know was this format change. Read what HE said.
The connection made to an "upcoming" business move does not = he was convinced at that "meeting".

It really sounds more like the move has been planned before the event and he merely attended to make business connections. But of course, this is purely speculation not presented as facts 🙄.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Back
Top Bottom