Radical348 said:Manny Michaels said:Mike said:Manny Michaels said:Drove through the city last week...KFOG couldn't sound less like San Francisco than it does now. Such a shame.
which begs the question "What DOES San Francisco sound like?" God knows KFOG is playing Train's "Save Me San Francisco" enuf times a week![]()
Seriously, I've had my gripes about some of what the new PD is doing... but what specifically did you hear that you didn't like? And what did you think was missing?
I guess I expected to hear something from San Francisco's deep and rich musical heritage and some imaging that connects the station with its community. KFOG could be dropped into any city in America; it's a generic AAA with a typical AAA list and to my ear, quite boring. Furthermore, there's a host of titles on the format's chart right now that are not compelling and will likely fade into obscurity. Every format goes through cycles when the music just isn't that good. The PD should recognize that and adjust accordingly. Increasing currents in this cycle is just bad strategy.
Ehh...it's got the imaging (they seriously play that damned foghorn in between every song), & the playlist does have a definite NorCal bent. If you've heard the others, it's not (at this point) as generic as most AAA's. Sure, a few of their tracks are boring, but I'd rather hear boring AAA currents than boring RocketMan 27x.
One issue right now is that Triple-A is playing a bunch of stuff that is *huge* at CHR: Adele. Matt Nathanson. Adele. Foster the People. Adele. Not sure whether that's good or bad for Triple-A, tho' I guess if someone with a PPM is hitting all the buttons on their car radio looking for "Rolling in the Deep", it increases the odds they'll land on you.
If you're a stable Triple-A that knows its audience, you can compensate for overexposed hits with other things. But if you're "transitioning" as KFOG is, it's a bit more problematic.