• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

New "Local" Show on FreeFM

WolfOnTheAir said:
Nice, so if you have no connection to the inside, you admit you're just posting false garbage then?
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Chris I will try saying this again. I did NOT post false garbage as you put it. What I wrote is factual. Not Embelished at all. The soUrces were direct and also happened from personal Events as well. Sorry to disapoint you.
You still didn't address why the outrage from you about the Big O and Dukes comments.
Are you upset at your choosing them for your station and expected the rest of the posters on here to love them?? :)
They are the WRONG choice. It proves Quality doesn't win out again. It's rather who you know and giving the lowest Performance possible for shock value that gets you noticed. LOL

I really love the fact that 1) you're calling me Chris and 2) you think I work for 101.5.

Full disclosure. I enjoyed Big O and Dukes when they were on in Baltimore. The show was tinkered with, and added a third mic which disrupted the flow of the show. Everything on the station wasn't doing that well anyway.

That's my only connection to the show.

As for you, you're posting "facts" from your "sources", which again shows you have a direct connection on the inside which is pretty high up, considering you're talking about the massive "interest" in the position AND that the "GM was busy".

Yeah, you're real trustworthy.
 
As for you, you're posting "facts" from your "sources", which again shows you have a direct connection on the inside which is pretty high up, considering you're talking about the massive "interest" in the position AND that the "GM was busy".

Yeah, you're real trustworthy.

____________________________________________________________________________________

And your point is what? I am standing by what I say and 100% accurate in what I wrote.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom