• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

"Newsroom culture clash" at CBS News

It's common practice for any show that has a rollover for later time zones or for digital posting. A good friend of mine is the editor for weekend Good Morning America, which has an odd workflow where it's only live to a handful of markets (Bangor, DC and I think one or two in Florida) and then re-rolls an hour later for most of the Eastern/Central timezones with a bunch of tweaks to fix errors and insert updates if there's breaking news.

Yeah. It's tempting to hit CBS/Bari/Tony for the edit, since there was all the hype about "transparency", but everyone cleans up a show for a later feed.
 
The thing about newscasts (from a guy who did them for 40+ years)...you're only as good as your last one. Fumbles, stumbles and tech mistakes are one thing. But commit journalistic malpractice, such as that described in the pull-quote, and that's fatal.
You're right there. Should be interesting to see the direction CBS goes and if viewers go along with it.
 
What would that be?
The opposite of what Bari is doing. Being on CBS carries a lot more weight than being on other networks. The Tiffany network, anyone? CBS has a star-studded line up of journalists others don’t have. If that changes, or with all of the changes already made, you risk losing your core viewers. As someone pointed out, the story that was pulled meant a lot more because it was pulled from 60 minutes. I never suspected CBS was ever “left” before Bari got there
 
The opposite of what Bari is doing.
Like having your new anchor unabashedly drool over the administration with “Marco Rubio, we salute you!” Moscow-level state media. It’s sickening. It’s pathetic. It’s the end of CBS as any type of serious, credible outlet.
Being on CBS carries a lot more weight than being on other networks.
Carried.
The Tiffany network, anyone?
Now the Temu of networks.
CBS has a star-studded line up of journalists others don’t have. If that changes, or with all of the changes already made, you risk losing your core viewers.
That ship has sailed.
As someone pointed out, the story that was pulled meant a lot more because it was pulled from 60 minutes. I never suspected CBS was ever “left” before Bari got there
They weren’t. That’s just nonsensical propaganda repeated over and over by the right wing knuckle-draggers.
 
Being on CBS carries a lot more weight than being on other networks. The Tiffany network, anyone?

That nickname goes back to the 1960s. That came from its founder Bill Paley. He's been gone for over 30 years. As I've said, when people talk about CBS News, they bring up Murrow and Cronkite. Nobody brings up Katie Couric or Connie Chung. CBS Evening News has been in last place among broadcast networks for almost 20 years. TV networks have been losing audience for 30 years. Network newscasts have become examples of why broadcast TV is dying.

If people don't watch CBS News because of Bari Weiss, they have lots of other options. Or they can watch no news at all. That seems to be what the majority of people are doing.
 
As someone pointed out, the story that was pulled meant a lot more because it was pulled from 60 minutes. I never suspected CBS was ever “left” before Bari got there

Whether or not CBS News was "left-wing" depend(s) on the mind of the critic reviewing it. It's a framing issue, and the people doing the framing now (members of the current Federal administration and their allies) are arguing that anything that doesn't tout the Administration line without criticism (or even letting critics on the air) is leftwing even if it comes from Rupert Murdock's own Fox News. I am therefore learning to no longer trust the framers.
 
Whether or not CBS News was "left-wing" depend(s) on the mind of the critic reviewing it. It's a framing issue, and the people doing the framing now (members of the current Federal administration and their allies) are arguing that anything that doesn't tout the Administration line without criticism (or even letting critics on the air) is leftwing even if it comes from Rupert Murdock's own Fox News. I am therefore learning to no longer trust the framers.

The right has had their sights turned on CBS since former CBS correspondent Bernard Goldberg wrote his supposed tell-all, Bias, almost 24 years ago:


I read the book at the time, and Bernie was clearly auditioning for a gig at FOX News...it took seven years, but they finally gave it to him.
 
That nickname goes back to the 1960s. That came from its founder Bill Paley. He's been gone for over 30 years. As I've said, when people talk about CBS News, they bring up Murrow and Cronkite. Nobody brings up Katie Couric or Connie Chung. CBS Evening News has been in last place among broadcast networks for almost 20 years. TV networks have been losing audience for 30 years. Network newscasts have become examples of why broadcast TV is dying.

If people don't watch CBS News because of Bari Weiss, they have lots of other options. Or they can watch no news at all. That seems to be what the majority of people are doing.
World News with David Muir is the #1 show in all of linear televsion with 7-8 million viewers a night.
 
Meanwhile, the CBS News Sunday morning talk show Face The Nation was #1 this past week:


However, before you celebrate, only 3 million people watched. That is 3 million out of over 300 million.

The show featured the secretary of state basically trying to walk back everything his boss has been saying about Venezuela.
 
While they deserve every single lost viewer and then some, a comparison to the mid-holiday weekend is not meaningful. As the normal overall viewing patterns return, a better comparison will be available.
They were on a low hill below I thought. I remember the media had a circular firing squad at Bernie Sanders' campaign about a decade ago during the primary against Hillary and Washington Post at one point ran a lot of hit pieces in just a 24 hour window right before an important vote. Not sure how CBS themselves fared, but other sources were very slanted.
 
I remember the media had a circular firing squad at Bernie Sanders' campaign about a decade ago during the primary against Hillary and Washington Post at one point ran a lot of hit pieces in just a 24 hour window right before an important vote. Not sure how CBS themselves fared, but other sources were very slanted.
So many New York Times articles and opinion pieces included "How this is bad for Democrats" in the headline that it became a meme on social media.
 
Has CBS Radio News been affected by these ideological changes yet? I have to admit I've rarely heard any of the radio news updates since WCBS 880 signed off.
I didn't think about that and for the first time since Christmas music ended, I should have been able to yesterday. I just didn't happen to be in the car at the right time.

But when it was still playing 60s and 70s instead of mostly 80s, another station was doing Fox News and I didn't hear bias. Maybe it won't affect the radio news.
 


Back
Top Bottom