• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

"Newsroom culture clash" at CBS News

And I'm afraid that some in that next generation (perhaps more than many would like to admit) don't want to see or hear actual news at all, regardless of the source of the product.
I was surprised earlier this week when a colleague (late 20s) had no idea there was a local tornado watch, not even that there was a prediction of a bad rain storm later that day.
 
So my point is that you can't, today, force information on listeners. There are too many audio providers that don't provide news, commentary and opinion in any form. And listeners who don't want to keep up´with the news don't have to listen, ever.

A day or two ago, one of the TV news providers did some street interviews. A significant number of those interviewed did not know that there was a war going on between "us and them" anywhere in the world, and even one of the people who was vaguely aware could not identify where the war was taking place.
David, do you ever watch the man-on-the-street bits during some of Jimmy Kimmel's monologues? Or assuming you never watch Kimmel, can you remember the Jaywalking segments on Leno's Tonight Show? (Or even occasionally Letterman, for that matter.) To watch those, you'd think the half-vast majority of Americans were imbeciles. The reality is never that simple. The street team goes out on the boulevard with a short list of trick questions, asks 50-or-so passers-by who are willing to play along the questions, and then asks the dumbest of the dumb to sign a release. Then they come back to home base and go to work in the video editing pod. Guaranteed, most of us who know the difference between a real president and Dipshit von Dimwit, or a war in Iran from one in the Faroe Islands, won't even be asked to sign the release. We don't make their point for them, and answering current events questions correctly just isn't funny.
 
Could we perhaps stop inadvertently equating "network" with the affiliate "stations"? It makes the discussion much more difficult to follow when terms are misapplied.
That's even worse then in that way. Each station/affiliate would be forced to carry a CBS network that is hybrid general entertainment/conservative talk.
 
That's even worse then in that way. Each station/affiliate would be forced to carry a CBS network that is hybrid general entertainment/conservative talk.
That's expressed rather inartfully, but I think your point is that CBS would become Fox News but with more entertainment shows. I will go back to something I mentioned earlier in this thread: Why would Fox News viewers tune to an imitation when they can have the real thing? Entertainment shows might be treated differently but they would cost more money to produce and wouldn't advance any kind of ideological project. Moreover, that's a different thing from the affiliate-network relationship. After all, an affiliate could choose to disaffiliate for any number of reasons. Whether that's realistic is yet another matter, but that option is there.
 
That's expressed rather inartfully, but I think your point is that CBS would become Fox News but with more entertainment shows. I will go back to something I mentioned earlier in this thread: Why would Fox News viewers tune to an imitation when they can have the real thing? Entertainment shows might be treated differently but they would cost more money to produce and wouldn't advance any kind of ideological project. Moreover, that's a different thing from the affiliate-network relationship. After all, an affiliate could choose to disaffiliate for any number of reasons. Whether that's realistic is yet another matter, but that option is there.

I think the hope was that the transformation of CBS News would be a little quieter in terms of the viewer's awareness---and that less-political independents who were already watching and knew enough to consider CBS News to be a mark of quality journalism would then simply take the Bari Weiss version at face value and with equal credibility. Not an attempt to steal FOX News viewers so much as an attempt to reach beyond that base.

But that hasn't happened.
 

CBS News Radio, with origins that trace back to the founding of the network nearly a century ago, will be shut down on May 22.

CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss and CBS News president Tom Cibrowski announced the closure of the unit on Friday, as the news division undergoes another round of jobs cuts.

In a memo obtained by Deadline, they wrote, “Today, we informed our CBS News Radio team and approximately 700 affiliated stations that we will end the service on May 22, 2026.

“Unfortunately, this decision means that all positions within the CBS News Radio team are being eliminated. We understand how difficult this news is for our staff and their colleagues, who have worked side by side with us to cover some of the most significant stories of our time.”


Here are more cuts announced at CBS News as its all a part of Paramount Merging with WB. Also CBS News Radio is shutting down. Audacy owned stations like KCBS, WINS, KNX, WBBM, KYW will lose their affiliation with CBS News Radio in May.

More to come.

The complete memo below:

Good morning,

Today we are reducing the size of our workforce, and employees who are affected will be notified by the end of the day.

We recognize that this is a difficult time for those who will be leaving CBS News. Because these aren’t just names on a list. They are talented, committed colleagues who have been critical to our success. We’ll treat them all with care and respect.

It’s no secret that the news business is changing radically, and that we need to change along with it. New audiences are burgeoning in new places, and we are pressing forward with ambitious plans to grow and invest so that we can be there for them. That means some parts of our newsroom must get smaller to make room for the things we must build to remain competitive.
But these are very hard choices and today is a difficult day.

This is a tough message to receive at any time, and especially in the middle of an exceptionally intense news cycle. This organization is working its heart out to deliver for our audience. We’re so grateful to all of you, and we thank you for handling this difficult news with compassion.

Bari and Tom
 
Subhead:
The cuts were revealed Friday morning to network news employees, including the shuttering of CBS News Radio after 100 years.
While stunning, I think that handwriting had been on the wall for a long time, maybe even since the divestiture of the radio stations to Entercom/Audacy. The affiliate count was slowly shrinking. It was absent from some fairly substantial markets, including Denver and the Front Range.

The Audacy all-news stations that carried the CBS top-of-hour news will have to adjust. That could also mean adjustments in news wheels, depending upon the approach taken.
 

Here is Audacy's response when they got the announcement their stations were losing their affiliation with CBS Radio News.
 
Preferably, the North Carolina Simian News Network. 😜
And AP could go from Associated Press to Anthropoid Public Extravaganza, "where we go ape over breaking news".
 




Audacy has issued another statement on how the CBS News Radio shut down affects Audacy owned stations like WBBM, KNX and others around the country that are going to lose their affiliation. So far we mainly seen local talent issue responses through their shows but not from Audacy management.
 

Here are some of the staff on the TV side that is being removed from CBS News due to the company wide cuts. But then again they got overshadowed by the elimination of CBS News Radio at the same time their removal took place.

Among those on the TV side hit by the layoffs were Elaine Quijano, a longtime correspondent and anchor who moderated the 2016 vice presidential debate between Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Mike Pence.

Omar Villafranca, a Dallas-based correspondent frequently seen on “CBS Evening News,” was also let go, according to people familiar with decision.

CBS News cut two correspondents who specialized in covering climate change — Dave Malkoff, a veteran of local Los Angeles stations, and David Schechter, who served as national environmental correspondent.

A CBS News representative did not comment on specific individuals affected by the cuts.

Several reporters and producers in the network’s Washington bureau were also affected.
 

Here are some of the staff on the TV side that is being removed from CBS News due to the company wide cuts. But then again they got overshadowed by the elimination of CBS News Radio at the same time their removal took place.
with Omar Villafranca & David Schechter being former reporters at Dallas TV stations, wonder if Omar rejoins KXAS NBC 5 or joins either WFAA or KDFW Fox 4 or just join ABC News or NBC News, meanwhile Schechter on the other hand, wonder if he'll be willing to return to WFAA since he left WFAA for that job at CBS news. as for Dave Malkoff, i can see him be rehired by The Weather Channel or just join Fox Weather or pull a "Ryan Hall" and go full YouTube weatherman.
 

Here are some of the staff on the TV side that is being removed from CBS News due to the company wide cuts. But then again they got overshadowed by the elimination of CBS News Radio at the same time their removal took place.

It looks like Bari Weiss tried to kill two (or more) birds with one stone. Yes, there is cost-cutting because of low ratings and lack of advertiser or younger generation support, but if you look at the list of who was cut, it's clear that political priorities were very much involved.
 


Back
Top Bottom