C
carlvanorden
Guest
A few didn't get it...
> > Some people on the forum> > are too anxious to take any comment as an attack on their> > favorite station, favorite ideas, etc. They pounced on me> > because of a benign comment about signal strengths and> > then proceeded to call me names, disparage where I live,> > attribute to me things I never said, etc.> > Look back to the start of this thread, my friend, and you'll> clearly see who "pounced" on who. Your basic argument all> along has been "WMTR doesn't have a strong signal where I> live, therefore they don't have a strong signal, period." > Thus it is no surprise that your argument has been> discredited, based on the solid evidence of how strong> WMTR's signal is -- day and night -- in nearly every> direction except yours.> > So, you live in WMTR's null. And we all feel sorry for you> because of it. But what you fail to realize is that> compared to the substantial majority of WMTR's listening> audience, you are the exception to the rule. Therefore your> repeated attempts to characterize WMTR's signal as a whole> based upon your personal experience with it are foolishly> naive, obviously invalid, and quite annoying.> "MIKE F" is Mike Ferriola, the Chief Engineer of WMTR. Believe me he knows what he is doing:>>WMTR's signal was always one of the very best AM signals, period. Now, it is even better, and as I pointed out, WMTR does have a signal in it's null. Put it bluntly, if we picked up WMTR in it's entirety and plopped it down in IOWA, WMTR would cover half the state easily; it is a superior plant.Carl<P ID="signature">______________
[email protected], [email protected],[email protected]</P>
> > Some people on the forum> > are too anxious to take any comment as an attack on their> > favorite station, favorite ideas, etc. They pounced on me> > because of a benign comment about signal strengths and> > then proceeded to call me names, disparage where I live,> > attribute to me things I never said, etc.> > Look back to the start of this thread, my friend, and you'll> clearly see who "pounced" on who. Your basic argument all> along has been "WMTR doesn't have a strong signal where I> live, therefore they don't have a strong signal, period." > Thus it is no surprise that your argument has been> discredited, based on the solid evidence of how strong> WMTR's signal is -- day and night -- in nearly every> direction except yours.> > So, you live in WMTR's null. And we all feel sorry for you> because of it. But what you fail to realize is that> compared to the substantial majority of WMTR's listening> audience, you are the exception to the rule. Therefore your> repeated attempts to characterize WMTR's signal as a whole> based upon your personal experience with it are foolishly> naive, obviously invalid, and quite annoying.> "MIKE F" is Mike Ferriola, the Chief Engineer of WMTR. Believe me he knows what he is doing:>>WMTR's signal was always one of the very best AM signals, period. Now, it is even better, and as I pointed out, WMTR does have a signal in it's null. Put it bluntly, if we picked up WMTR in it's entirety and plopped it down in IOWA, WMTR would cover half the state easily; it is a superior plant.Carl<P ID="signature">______________
[email protected], [email protected],[email protected]</P>