As Frank mentioned, Nielsen-subscribed radio and TV stations, plus some who stream too, watermark/encode information about the station in their audio. When worn on a panelist, the PPM beltpack can hear that watermark, recording and sending the details back to Nielsen for tabulation.PPM is a device that somehow knows what you're listening to right?
Correct.Vs a diary where the listener writes down what they remember listening too?
Does it send this over the listeners wifi or mobile data?When worn on a panelist, the PPM beltpack can hear that watermark, recording and sending the details back to Nielsen for tabulation.
David could answer that question better than I, but I believe the PPM uses cell data to send back what is collected.Does it send this over the listeners wifi or mobile data?
Because it's all about controlling the environment and data collection. Using the Nielsen PPM device allows them to have better control from hearing and recording the content/watermark, to sending it back to the mothership. The whole process is consistent with other users in all markets. Using someone's cell phone can't guarantee the quality and consistency of the data collected, nor ensure someone can't tamper with the collection.Why do they have to ware a seperate device when most people have smartphones these days?
Data is collected on the PPM device and fed to Nielsen when the device is docked for charging.David could answer that question better than I, but I believe the PPM uses cell data to send back what is collected.
Absolutely. The MRC (Media Research Council) has not approved the concept of using user-supplied devices like phones as they "un-level" the playing field by not having equal frequency response, sensitivity and directionality.Because it's all about controlling the environment and data collection. Using the Nielsen PPM device allows them to have better control from hearing and recording the content/watermark, to sending it back to the mothership. The whole process is consistent with other users in all markets. Using someone's cell phone can't guarantee the quality and consistency of the data collected, nor ensure someone can't tamper with the collection.
No, not exactly it. Stations have a strong need to have an identity so that people will come back often and think of it as a "favorite".PPM market stations can do dead segues, and Jock breaks without saying the station name once.
Then again, one company, with most of their stations in diary, want their stations to mention their Facebook page every break, and mentioning the station name itself is not of concern.
Very very secondary.,They want people to read the recycled pop culture content on Facebook more so than listen to the actual radio stations.
And that is because Americans in Seattle tend to like the same kinds of formats as Americans in Boston or Houston or Coffeville, KS.Then again, the content on Facebook is a little different from station page to station page, where as the programming aired over their FM signals are identical in every different market.
The days of "your friends on the radio" are gone as our friends are on social media. We want different things from radio.When they do a live event, I'm not sure that there's a radio talents who shows up there, I think they just send in the clowns.
But it's fact that in PPM markets there are Jock breaks without saying the station name at all.
Dead segues are also very common.
Maybe on certain stations.But it's fact that in PPM markets there are Jock breaks without saying the station name at all.
That may be true of certain stations, and in some cases of PDs who do not understand that the PPM does not reduce the need for station identity reinforcement. In fact, the PPC shows people listen for very short, often interrupted, intervals. So knowing where to go back to is critical.Dead segues are also very common.
They also probably don't want more data going into the system. Everyone has a cell phone.Absolutely. The MRC (Media Research Council) has not approved the concept of using user-supplied devices like phones as they "un-level" the playing field by not having equal frequency response, sensitivity and directionality.
How would using panelist's phones increase data going into the system?They also probably don't want more data going into the system. Everyone has a cell phone.
If they had the numbers of every radio listener would that be good or bad for advertisers.How would using panelist's phones increase data going into the system?
PPM panel households are recruited because they fit a specific demographic need to make the panel reflect the measured universe. A panel survey attempts to be a "perfect" miniature replica of the market, identical on every variable.
They don't accept volunteer participants. You must be selected and recruited by Nielsen to be on the PPM panel.
It would be terrible, as they would have sheer numbers and no demographics with breaks on age, gender, ethnicity, education, income and area of residence.If they had the numbers of every radio listener would that be good or bad for advertisers.
If they had the numbers of every radio listener would that be good or bad for advertisers.
It would be terrible, as they would have sheer numbers and no demographics with breaks on age, gender, ethnicity, education, income and area of residence.
There have been radio ratings in the past based on detecting the frequency of a station that is radiated from radios. This goes back to the late 40's in fact.There would also be a huge privacy issue, because not everyone wants to participate or give personal information.
The assumption is that a signal radiated by a device is "public" and can be used for data. Since nothing personal is revealed, there is no privacy issue.
And that was why MobilTRAK failed 20-some years ago.But as you point out, the only data it would reveal is a number, and not demos. Not very useful in what Nielsen does.