TheBigA said:
michael hagerty said:
Once again, BigA, that list is nearly impossible to produce, but for a different reason: Because to have been over 65 in the 1970s, you would have had to have been born between 1904 and 1913.
In my previous post, I gave examples of people who were born in 1903 and were still in radio in the 1960s, but they retired at that age. That's the point. As I said, radio was not a lifetime career unless, like Tom Donohue, you died at age 47. The other change that happened in the 70s was the influx of female DJs, which didn't really exist during the first half of the radio age. Working women and working past 65 are just two sociological changes that have taken place in the last 40 years. But the consistent criticism I hear about radio is how old it sounds, and how young people don't listen. And my point is there's a correlation between the age of the people on the air, and the audience they attract. People want to hear relatable voices, and white men over 65 don't relate to young black or Hispanic women. That's simply a fact, and with the population shifting away from white men, radio NEEDS to adapt to the changing audience. I'm sorry if that offends, but it's simply a sociological fact.
One of the requirements of being in radio is to appeal to a target demo. You move out of that demo, and don't keep up with the lifestyle changes of the demo, then you no longer meet that job requirement. So while your talent may be as good or better than it was 30 years ago, your audience has aged out of the sales demo. That makes your show harder to sell to advertisers, who pay your salary. What do you suggest owners do?
Well, we're all over the map here. Tom Donahue and Wolfman Jack are irrelevant, because they never got to their 60s. We don't know what their career choices would have been as they aged and whether they'd have held audience to the point that station owners considered them valuable past 65.
Martin Block, Arthur Godfrey and Don McNeil were holdovers from old network radio and didn't so much retire as get forced out because they didn't roll with the changes.
Now, as to how old radio sounds and how young people don't listen, there are formats young people aren't going to listen to to begin with. Oldies is one of them. Sportstalk on AM is probably another.
I doubt there's much appeal to KQED and KCBS for a young listener even if you put 24 year olds in every on-air position.
KMEL would appeal to a younger audience, and from the looks of their website, they have an age-appropriate jock staff. Ditto 99.7 Now, Wild 94.9,.....
So just where are all these dinsoaurs chasing the younger listeners away?