Re: Amazing
> > If clusters are meeting their budgets and the ratings are
> acceptable, why would the higher-ups assume there's a
> problem?
>
> Uhhh... perhaps notice the incredible amount of turnover?
Sure, but like I said, if all the info is filtered through the GM, then of course he's not going to paint himself as the problem.
> Besides, budgets haven't been met in years in Greenville.
>
> Anytime you go over the GM's head to complain, somebody's
> career is going to suffer and there is no guarantee that it
> won't be the complainer's.
>
True. Can't say I would go past the GM in that situation. You're risking a lot when you do that. Which is my point exactly when you ask how someone like Godofsky could let it go on as long as he did. If nobody took the info to him, he probably wasn't aware. Once you get up the corporate ladder, all that matters are the numbers on the books, and obviously Greenville's were good enough not to warrant any additional scrutiny.
> > If clusters are meeting their budgets and the ratings are
> acceptable, why would the higher-ups assume there's a
> problem?
>
> Uhhh... perhaps notice the incredible amount of turnover?
Sure, but like I said, if all the info is filtered through the GM, then of course he's not going to paint himself as the problem.
> Besides, budgets haven't been met in years in Greenville.
>
> Anytime you go over the GM's head to complain, somebody's
> career is going to suffer and there is no guarantee that it
> won't be the complainer's.
>
True. Can't say I would go past the GM in that situation. You're risking a lot when you do that. Which is my point exactly when you ask how someone like Godofsky could let it go on as long as he did. If nobody took the info to him, he probably wasn't aware. Once you get up the corporate ladder, all that matters are the numbers on the books, and obviously Greenville's were good enough not to warrant any additional scrutiny.