• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Rep. Mike Rogers gets a radio show

Except that it's already been tried. Would it kill them to let this guy hone his skills in a single market before cramming him down the throats of the public? Did they not learn their lesson from Huckabee?

No, it has not been tried. Every talk show host is a specific individual, with specific, individual strengths and weaknesses. Yes, there have been other talk show hosts turned loose on a large audience who failed. But no one has ever tried turning Mike Rogers loose. Putting Mike Rogers on the air is something that has never been tried before.

Do you know how many different hosts NBC tried to replace Jack Paar, all of whom failed? So why stick some washed up game show host on? The idea of using a new host had already been tried. Why try Johnny Carson?
 
No, it has not been tried. Every talk show host is a specific individual, with specific, individual strengths and weaknesses. Yes, there have been other talk show hosts turned loose on a large audience who failed. But no one has ever tried turning Mike Rogers loose. Putting Mike Rogers on the air is something that has never been tried before.

Do you know how many different hosts NBC tried to replace Jack Paar, all of whom failed? So why stick some washed up game show host on? The idea of using a new host had already been tried. Why try Johnny Carson?

You can't honestly be comparing a guy who will likely be off the air within a year of starting to Johnny Carson.

Again, if he started smaller, he'd have a chance. He's being thrown to the wolves. This is why he will fail.
 
He's being thrown to the wolves. This is why he will fail.

That's what some people would consider a challenge. Real competitors rise to the occasion. If he's not a real competitor, then he will fail. We'll see what he's made of. But working in small markets just prepares you for staying in small markets.
 
That's what some people would consider a challenge. Real competitors rise to the occasion. If he's not a real competitor, then he will fail. We'll see what he's made of. But working in small markets just prepares you for staying in small markets.

And being a politician prepares you for being a bad national host.
 
Let's be realistic here. Whether you're hosting a show for millions and millions of people or only a few dozen, you're sitting in a little room with a microphone, maybe some notes, and someone screening calls. The feedback you get as to whether something you're doing works or not comes from (or through) the handful of management types who sign your paycheck. Big or small market, just gabbing into a microphone doesn't make you better at gabbing into a microphone. Good, solid feedback and coaching from someone who knows what they're talking about does help make you better.

But the best that good coaching can do is to polish raw talent. The best coaches/trainers in the world, working with an individual who doesn't have the talent, cannot create a good talk show host. But, given a person blessed with the right way talent, sometimes only minimal coaching is enough to make them into a star.

Talent is a funny thing. You cannot make accurate blanket statements about which group of people have the talent to be talk show hosts and which group doesn't. Pick any possible background your imagination can conceive. It's possible that you might find a good talk show host with that background, and it's possible you won't. Prior career experience is a totally unreliable indicator of whether or not any rookie talk show host will do well.
 
Let's be realistic here. Whether you're hosting a show for millions and millions of people or only a few dozen, you're sitting in a little room with a microphone, maybe some notes, and someone screening calls. The feedback you get as to whether something you're doing works or not comes from (or through) the handful of management types who sign your paycheck. Big or small market, just gabbing into a microphone doesn't make you better at gabbing into a microphone. Good, solid feedback and coaching from someone who knows what they're talking about does help make you better.

But the best that good coaching can do is to polish raw talent. The best coaches/trainers in the world, working with an individual who doesn't have the talent, cannot create a good talk show host. But, given a person blessed with the right way talent, sometimes only minimal coaching is enough to make them into a star.

Talent is a funny thing. You cannot make accurate blanket statements about which group of people have the talent to be talk show hosts and which group doesn't. Pick any possible background your imagination can conceive. It's possible that you might find a good talk show host with that background, and it's possible you won't. Prior career experience is a totally unreliable indicator of whether or not any rookie talk show host will do well.

This is a good point. The non-radio people that have gotten good have been coached by radio people. Does anyone honestly think there will be any of that going on in this day and age?

As for small market vs. syndicated/large market, there are more people to please and better competition in large markets. This requires better talent. Sure, the job is the same. But the level of quality expected is different.
 
You couldn't name one if you had to.

So? Specialists in teaching talk radio hosts aren't exactly well-known people. If anyone needed to find one, it wouldn't take much searching. They're probably a lot like acting coaches. Few people know the names of any, but if an actor needs one, he can find one very, very easily.
 
Some of us come here for serious discussion of radio, not to go round and round with a stubborn troll.

Mr Pot? Meet Mr. Kettle.

No requirement that you have to respond. They have an "ignore" button. It's your choice to be here, and your choice to respond.
 
Last edited:
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom