What's most interesting is to examine the 12+ numbers in light of what we know about the demographic history (as well as the targets) of each of these stations.
WHAM's announced target demo is 35-64. Historically it's been very top-heavy at the older end of that range, as well as a huge share of 65+, giving it the 12+ beauty contest prize, but likely not bringing it the kind of $$$ they surely want from it. WBEE may be a share point back, but its strength is more gender-balanced and very heavily 25-54, which is just what advertisers really, really want.
WDKX is building its strength on 12-34 listeners both inside and outside the city, and that's not just good news for its current situation, but probably for its future since listeners you win young, you tend to hold on to for a long time. The 16 year-old listener of today will probably still be listening to them at 32. And the next generation of 16-year-olds will be with them too. If they stay the course of playing the hits across the demograophic spectrum with personality, they'll stay strong for a long time, a lot like WBBF enjoyed a quarter-century of success from about 1955 to 1980--except that BBF eventually got pushed aside by FM competition and that won't be a problem for DKX. The Langstons might want to think about extending their signal either by raising power to the limit for their class A license (which would mean doubling it), or seeing if a struggling full-market-coverage station can be pried loose from its current owner at a discount, and moving the DKX call and format to a new stronger signal. (Drive 100.5 looks like a candidate, since Clear Channel is hurting and seems to have given up on that station.) They could then turn around and either sell 103.9, or keep it and turn it into the market's first Latin format station, the one formatic hole no one has tried yet to fill.
Legends 102.7 is showing there was a genuine need for an oldies/classic hits station, and they're filling it well to a lot of listeners' satisfaction. Their music mix sounds positively crazy at times. I've heard a sweep of Sinatra/jingle/Rolling Stones recently. While Fickle, or Jack in Buffalo, may talk about "playing everything" or "playing what we want", the folks at Crawford are actually doing it, and getting away with it. They probably will continue to get away with it, whatever radio experts and purists may say. It works far better than those other automated stations because Legends has live and likable human beings in most dayparts presenting it and tying it all together. The personality a station presents is just as important as its music programming--maybe even more important--and if the personality is warm and friendly, the music can work even if logic and research says otherwise.
CMF is finding out just how much losing Wease has hurt them--and Fox 95.1 has, in Wease, finally found the act that can make the station a real player. They won't progress further unless they bolster other dayparts with live local personality (something I don't think we can expect anytime soon from Clear Channel, which seems bent on slitting its corporate throat through forcing many of its stations into dependence on national syndication and voicetracking). But Wease will keep them alive.
Kiss and Drive can't rebound under the new corporate strategy. What's going to get them more listeners when they've driven away their only real point of contact with the local audience, those stations' morning shows? Electronic juke boxes never lead their formats against live local competition. PXY and Buzz have been handed a gift by Clear Channel.
Down toward the other end of the ratings pecking order, we now have proof that Rochester cannot support two sports-talk stations. Either WHTK (which has fallen in half in 12+ numbers since WROC started battling it) or WROC (ditto) will have to give it up. One station might survive with a format that can deliver maybe a 2 share aggregate to every station within it. Two of them, splitting less than a two share, can't. It'll be interesting to see who gives it up, and what they change to--but a change will have to come to one of them.