• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Rumor: Howard Stern to xxxleavexxx Stay At SXM

The ironic thing about current political criticism of Stern is that he "stopped having the courage to be himself, to speak his mind, to talk back to the establishment."

Yet, their criticism of him is often rooted in politics - because he doesn't conform to the opinions they expected him to have given how he once behaved on the air. And he doesn't support their "establishment" and leader.

For good and bad, Stern has always been Stern. He was doing what he felt he needed to do in the younger FM days and grew to do what he wants to do now. All of it is individualism and given that "liberal" politics aren't popular in the mainstream of the talk format, Stern is still doing something counter-cultural.

And the same people who think he should be on their side now come from the side that in many cases, didn't believe his show ever belonged on FM. He was always a crusader for open speech vs the FCC, and the current FCC has certain forms of speech now they deem offensive. Speech that offends the current administration.

In other words, basing one's critique of Stern on his politics has exposed a lot of hypocrisy and irony given his career. Yet even though he's grown as a person, he's still himself. Few people get to be themselves on the radio, the way Howard has. And that's what inspires many broadcasters who respect him, even if their content is completely different.
 

If one is wondering why we keep hearing talks about Howard Stern and SiriusXM splitting off after a 20 year run some of this is how Joe Rogan is ranked first for most listened to podcasts in 2nd Quarter of 2025.
  1. The Joe Rogan Experience
  2. Crime Junkie
  3. The Daily
  4. Call Her Daddy
  5. This Past Weekend w/Theo Von
  6. SmartLess (+3)
  7. Dateline NBC (-1)
  8. Stuff You Should Know (+5)
  9. This American Life (-2)
  10. New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
 

If one is wondering why we keep hearing talks about Howard Stern and SiriusXM splitting off after a 20 year run some of this is how Joe Rogan is ranked first for most listened to podcasts in 2nd Quarter of 2025.
I’ve never heard of most of those shows.
 
Another a Murdoch rag piling on the same unsourced tale the Sun ran.





Consider the source. Right wingers hate Stern and never miss an opportunity to smear him.
Democrat here. Howard is hardly an activist. He is the champion of incels who cannot get a date and therefore despise women. He has spent years pitying himself and his relationship with Sirius management. Every year, he threatens to leave and tries to agitate the listeners into complaining to Sirius management. How would you like to work for Sirius and have to put up with Stern in your office vebally abusing you in the coarsest language possible ? He is no one to be admired.
 
Democrat here. Howard is hardly an activist. He is the champion of incels who cannot get a date and therefore despise women. He has spent years pitying himself and his relationship with Sirius management. Every year, he threatens to leave and tries to agitate the listeners into complaining to Sirius management. How would you like to work for Sirius and have to put up with Stern in your office vebally abusing you in the coarsest language possible ? He is no one to be admired.
Most of Howard’s persona is all an act. Even back during his WNBC days. It was all an act. I think he’s more himself now. Do people like that, who knows.
 
People grow and change. The people that idolized how Stern and Leykis spoke about relationships and dating sorts of topics in their FM days loathe their politics now and complain Stern's lost his "edge" or "sold out."

He grew up and went to therapy. Part of being a "liberal" I would think would be realizing people can progress and improve. If one can believe that criminals can be rehabilitated, and punishments should fit the crime, then I don't see why one can't believe Stern might have outgrown the angry young man persona, and understand at the core that he's deeply curious about human beings and all facets of their lives, which is what made him grow into an excellent interviewer.

No one has to be a Stern fan, but to consider him the same today as he was on FM isn't an accurate assessment.
 
It is not the role of the FCC to become the arbiter of news.
That is NOT what the FCC chair said:

"Legacy broadcasters will have to return to unbiased journalism and "reorient," or deal with struggling ratings, Carr said."

He said the marketplace will decide. That's a rational and reasonable conservative point of view. Far better than " F... the US President."
 
That is NOT what the FCC chair said:

"Legacy broadcasters will have to return to unbiased journalism and "reorient," or deal with struggling ratings, Carr said."

He said the marketplace will decide. That's a rational and reasonable conservative point of view. Far better than " F... the US President."
When have news organizations said F the president.
 
The marketplace has already decided. No need for the government to interfere.
My point exactly. I was referring to this statement:
It is not the role of the FCC to become the arbiter of news.
The poster was implying that they were.And it was Stephen Colbert who dropped the F-bomb. His show is not a news program but certainly a political delivery vehicle for CBS.
 
well, we have reached the point of the thread where the talk of politics become the main focus and fully derails it to the point that personal politics comes into play and guess what happens when that happens, the mods shut the thread down for that reason.

truth be told, the reason why Stern's ratings on SXM has decline is a combo of politics, less edgy content and more focus on interviews, Stern's own age as now he's in retirement age and stop being the edgy guy he was 25 years ago as he was in his 30s and 40s at the height of his career in the 1980s-early 2000 and he 51-52 when he switched to Sirius Satellite Radio (pre-merger) and technology changed since his arrival at Sirius XM with the rise of Smart Phones and how it made podcasts easier to access then it did in 2006 when Stern arrived at Sirius.

so, to quote Abraham "Grandpa" Simpson, Stern used to be with ‘it’, but then they changed what ‘it’ was. Now what he is with isn’t ‘it’ anymore and what’s ‘it’ seems weird and scary to him, and it will happen to us too
 
Stern never said anything that wasn’t truthful. Sure he would walk a fine line of indecency but he was never slanderous. His views on the current president are spot on. People might not like it but they can’t deny it.
 
People grow and change. The people that idolized how Stern and Leykis spoke about relationships and dating sorts of topics in their FM days loathe their politics now and complain Stern's lost his "edge" or "sold out."

He grew up and went to therapy. Part of being a "liberal" I would think would be realizing people can progress and improve. If one can believe that criminals can be rehabilitated, and punishments should fit the crime, then I don't see why one can't believe Stern might have outgrown the angry young man persona, and understand at the core that he's deeply curious about human beings and all facets of their lives, which is what made him grow into an excellent interviewer.

No one has to be a Stern fan, but to consider him the same today as he was on FM isn't an accurate assessment.
I will say his interviewing skills have improved greatly.
 
Then why is the chairman of the FCC even commenting on "unbiased media." The media can be as biased as its audience wants it to be.

There is no fairness doctrine. Nobody has to be fair or balanced. That applies equally to both sides of the political spectrum, regardless of president.
Let's try this one more time. The FCC Chair said:

"Legacy broadcasters will have to return to unbiased journalism and "reorient," or deal with struggling ratings."

To me that's simply an observation, not a mandate. He's saying that the free market will decide, and that THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT BE INVOLVED.

What's wrong with that?
 
Because who's he to say what anyone is doing now isn't "unbiased journalism?" NPR stations are #1 in DC, SF and many other cities. They don't have a problem with struggling ratings. So I guess what they're doing is unbiased journalism. It must be, since the public is listening.
Well I'm just glad we don't live in a country where we're prohibited from expressing an opinion.
 


Back
Top Bottom