tjthedj said:So - penalize the "little guys" - ROB them of their station! ...HELP the big guys. That's smart- not.
You'd be a great NAB staff member.
Your "news idea" gets into programming. The fcc already meddles enough.
Back to the drawing board, Fred.
Surfer said:I say get out while you can! Radio's dead. Without Martin & Lewis we're all sunk! Bring back Mutual Radio!
Oh, uhhh, sorry. Brief sanity lapse. I like working in a business where my opinions don't count, my programming choices don't matter, the audience isn't there and the government wants to mess with my only way of living. Maybe I shouln't complain.![]()
tjthedj said:Fred, I totally disagree with you. You are as full of bs as your buddy Holland.
(time for local stuff inserted here)
- School lunch menus
Yeziknoradio said:I can't speak for everyone, but indeed remember, if you talk...who cares if it's mono or stereo.
The All news formats, and talk radio should continue to do well for many years to come.
Plus, if the music was originally recorded in mono...
fred flintstone said:Look for FM to become talk, Urban music and Hispanic music.
Look for AM to become brokered, preachers, foreign language and infomercials.
Until they shut it down, which has already happened in parts of the world.
SirRoxalot said:1) The vast majority of markets, from the largest to the smallest, have viable AM stations that have decent numbers in demographics other than 65-Death. Those stations provide a variety of information, including news, talk, sports, etc. The key is that they provide timely information of interest to a large number of listeners. As long as they continue to provide that type of information better than anybody else in the market, people will continue to set a button or find the AM/FM switch.
2) Radio is an ever-evolving medium. There seems to be an innate need for some people to disseminate their ideas to others. AM radio provides an opportunity for those people. Successful AM stations will provide the opportunity to people who can attract enough listeners to interest sponsors.
3) There's nothing wrong with local stations providing local information and entertainment, no matter how "hick" that may seem to you. You might be surprised at the number of people who willingly live in small communities because they don't want, or care about, the problems that come with high population density. They do care about local high school and college sports, sales at local stores, and even issues at the local school board. Those people are called "citizens", and that type of community is very involved in their own governance. AM radio provides a lot of opportunities for the exchange of ideas. In some cases, they're the only local voice in the entertainment spectrum.
tjthedj said:How is it the station that all that was on BEAT WGN and WLS (numbers combined)?
tjthedj said:By the way you guys that have to crunch every number and want to remove the local stuff etc., I DON'T CARE. What I did worked very well at the time for me.
I've been very blessed. Several of my business partners are DEAD. Several of the station owners around me waited MUCH too long to sell, and the guy I sold to (with an anti-local attitude like Fred and using the bird) has a much worse market and in fact, a shrinking market to sell in. I don't care. I got my money.
We are very happy. I did what I dreamed about doing (even more)since I was 12; owning not 1 but 4 places (an am and 3 fm's). My wife and I did a good job, SOLD all 4 places (and more) in 1985 for a million 4 hundred thousand on a rainy Saturday morning, and have moved on to a much better way of life, with holidays, vacations and no more getting up at 3:30am.
That way of life is thanks to God and MY good judgement, our hard work, good timing, and radio. I was at the right place at the right time.