Oh, Dan, you must be a riot at cocktail parties!
I hope you won a fortune in prize money at those MIT Rube Goldberg contests!
Jeff's radio would work perfectly in my home, indeed with no computer necessary. The house is a hotspot, and still could be even without a single PC on the premises. My wireless routers work just as well without a single computer's being connected. Yes, I did use a PC for five minutes after I bought the router (several years ago) to configure the IP. So what? That was in 2005. Your home TV wouldn't work had the electric company not installed the service line back whenever. You wouldn't have heat had a furnace not been installed. Your car wouldn't go had the factory not completed it.
It sounds to me like you're obfuscating-- big time!
I know from reading your other posts, Dan, that you're really "into" terrestrial radio. And I dig that. That's why most of us are here (or at least, first arrived here-- WHEN we cared). You're several hundred miles from me, yet provided more information about this supposed "King of Prussia station" on the Philly board than I'd even known-- having lived in K of P my whole life. For that, "props", as the kids would say.
But I'm having a hard time trying to figure out why you're seemingly trying so hard to "spit on the prize" here. Are you really trying to discredit any system of aural programming that isn't AM/FM because you love terrestrial radio, or, do you just enjoy a good debate? (If it's the latter, then I can at least understand and in some strange way respect that.)
Yes, as Rollye says, the Information "Superhighway" really still is mostly a dirt road. But the rate at which it's being paved is astounding.
Terrestrial Radio Industry Patriots love to point out that Internet audio listening requires a "subscription". This "logic" is flawed at best, and is a borderline lie.
Few Americans, if any, will get broadband Internet solely for so-called "Internet radio". I realize not EVERYBODY has it yet, but with U.S. broadband penetration about to soar past 60% before year's end-- unbelievably up from just 35% only three years ago (Source: Pew Internet And American Life Project)-- it's clearly ubiquitous for what is now a majority of Americans. In other words, for those of you who went to MIT, they already have it. (Sorry Dan, but you're the one who started all the, "Look at me, I went to MIT" stuff-- grin. Plus I don't feel bad, for my grades probably wouldn't have allowed me entry to even wash the windows there.)
Now, if they already have broadband for a hundred other reasons more important to them than hearing radio online (which for most normal people-- not us, of course-- is indeed the case), then using one of Jeff's radios is in fact just as "free" as is listening to an AM or FM station. Using a TRIP's logic ("Internet radio isn't free; the listener has to pay for broadband"), I could just as easily say the average Rhode Island homeowner pays $174 a month to listen to WPRO (for the electricity). Just imagine the field day Dan would have trying to figure out what it would cost to listen on a car radio! (At $4.20 a gallon, the gasoline's energy eventually is converted by the alternator into DC, which powers the radio, etc.) And I should be careful what I wish for. With his MIT education, he probably could actually calculate that with some degree of accuracy while I'm just now getting my VCR to stop blinking "12:00".
I've seen Jeff's radio, and it is indeed, a gas.
It's a tad clunky, and isn't portable (no battery option, and I have seen at least one other that used "C"-cells and wasn't all that power-hungry at all-- it played for something like 18 hours straight at full room volume on DC). But it seemed very user-friendly, and had tremendous sound.
Right now, I'm listening to WLNG Sag Harbor (from over 100 miles away) via my computer. It's what I listen to every night. It would be great to not have to use my PC, which is hooked to a small in-home FM transmitter.
I want one of these things.
The bottom line, to me, is that this is amazing stuff. And stuff the terrestrial industry needs to pay attention to, rather than poo-poo.
It's so refreshing to read of Holland Cooke's enthusiasm for this technology. I hope he and his clients are making a fortune thanks to his experience, ideas, and foresight.
Kind of makes me want to take the "con" out of "consultant"...