Back in the old days, weather technology on TV wasn't much. In fact, the person who gave the forecast probably wasn't a meteorologist though WAVE and WHAS-TV were the exception. If a TV station had a radar it was war surplus that could display storm images. Of course today, stations have Doppler (insert channel number)-thousand able to dissect the storm and the coverage is more to show off the toys and build a weather image.
If you remember WHAS radio rarely went wall to wall on weather. However between each song you knew what was happening. Part of the promotion of the Constant Alert Tone (do they even still use that?) was that you knew in five seconds if a tornado warning was issued for the Louisville metro area.
The bottom line is getting the information on the air. Even the simplest part timer can convey the basic information (the event, areas involved and time frame). I'll take that over what we find more often today, a radio station on auto-pilot.
If you remember WHAS radio rarely went wall to wall on weather. However between each song you knew what was happening. Part of the promotion of the Constant Alert Tone (do they even still use that?) was that you knew in five seconds if a tornado warning was issued for the Louisville metro area.
BleuLou said:With today’s advanced technology a radio station would be foolish to opt for an untrained air personality over a TV Meteorologist. When a tornado is approaching, time is of the essence and one does not have time to allow a “DJ” to attempt to interpret and pass along second hand information. I’ll take the TV audio or live radio chatter any day. Now, with that said, I do see the importance of live radio coverage AFTER the severe weather has passed.
The bottom line is getting the information on the air. Even the simplest part timer can convey the basic information (the event, areas involved and time frame). I'll take that over what we find more often today, a radio station on auto-pilot.