• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Spring Ratings 2016

Let me ask you this: Why weren't talk radio programmers making changes and tweaks to their format years, if not decades, ago?

Depends on the station. Lots of changes, lots of tweaks, lots of attempts to try different hosts, different types of talk. All have been tried. Be specific.

Of course ten years ago, the current talk format was incredibly popular. No one was thinking about changing it then because it was successful. However, a lot of new hosts were trying to break in and cash in on the talk boom.
 
Last edited:
How would one know if there were a big audience for some other form of talk if that form of talk isn't being programmed?

Everything has been done at some point. It either attracts an audience, or it doesn't. But lots of things have been tried. You might not know because either it wasn't done where you live, or it failed.

Here's an idea: There's plenty of celebrity-oriented talk on TV, satellite radio and on numerous websites.


The celebrity-oriented thing appeals mainly to younger women. You hear it being done in morning CHR and Hot AC shows. Not so much in talk, because the format primarily attracts older men who absolutely are revolted by celebrity talk. NPR will often have celebrity guests, although not the specific example you give.
 
Of course ten years ago, the current talk format was incredibly popular. No one was thinking about changing it then because it was successful.

Well let me investigate this. Let's look at seven years ago. That's as far back as I can go. The only Talk station reporting Spring 2016 is WBEN at 9.5.

In Spring 2009, WBEN was 9.6.
 
Well let me investigate this. Let's look at seven years ago. That's as far back as I can go. The only Talk station reporting Spring 2016 is WBEN at 9.5.

In Spring 2009, WBEN was 9.6.

It's the same people, but they are nearly a decade older an a large percentage have moved out of 25-54.
 
Well let me investigate this. Let's look at seven years ago. That's as far back as I can go. The only Talk station reporting Spring 2016 is WBEN at 9.5.

In Spring 2009, WBEN was 9.6.

On the whole, the format nationally is a shell of it's former self.

MOST talk stations, especially in the large and major markets, have only a fraction of the audience they had just 10 years ago---and what they DO have left is getting less and less advertising dollar friendly as they age.
 
According to the ratings, WBEN is #2 12+. That will still get you some ad dollars. Considering that Entercom is #1 in earnings, they must be getting substantial ad dollars on WBEN. I'm sure that the lower demos suck, but they're still getting enough angry old white men to do OK.
 
It's sad that any local business continues to support the vitriol that
WBEN puts out. It's also an embarrassment that clowns like Carl Paladino have
local followers. They want to turn the clock back to 1955...
 
It's sad that any local business continues to support the vitriol that
WBEN puts out. It's also an embarrassment that clowns like Carl Paladino have
local followers. They want to turn the clock back to 1955...

They get a lot of sales from listeners, I'm sure. It's an embarrassment to hear clowns like Pridgen on the station, however.
 
According to the ratings, WBEN is #2 12+. That will still get you some ad dollars. Considering that Entercom is #1 in earnings, they must be getting substantial ad dollars on WBEN. I'm sure that the lower demos suck, but they're still getting enough angry old white men to do OK.

Radio is not a sporting even where there is only one winner. In very large markets like LA and New York City, there can be twenty to twenty five in the money winners (along with a lot of niche stations with low or no ratings but which make very nice money). In middle markets, anywhere from eight to twelve stations can be big winners.

Rank is important in whatever demo or target an advertiser wants to reach, but the cost for reaching that demo is just as important. WBEN does well in billing because it may sell at lower average rates but it has more units per hour than music stations do. It is, after all, the second highest biller in the market.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom