• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Stephanie Miller receives hate-filled death threat letter

FightingIrish said:
Following her appearance on FOX News' "Hannity & Colmes" last week, a deranged FOX viewer sent Stephanie Miller some rather vile threat-filled hate mail. There was a veiled threat on her life.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3693

What did she do? She called him live on the air!

http://www.bradblog.com/Audio/StephanieMiller_SockDeathThreat_103006.mp3

A copy of the uncensored letter:

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3693
http://ltradio.blogspot.com/2006/10/hate-filled-death-threat-letter-sent-to.html

give that woman an honorary set. Just drop dead hilarious! You know that call wasn't a fake, either. ;D
 
...didja ever think you'd live to see the day when Stephanie Miller and Tucker Carlson would have something in common (namely being the targets of filth-laden threats from Faux News viewers)?...
 
FightingIrish said:
Following her appearance on FOX News' "Hannity & Colmes" last week, a deranged FOX viewer sent Stephanie Miller some rather vile threat-filled hate mail. There was a veiled threat on her life.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3693

What did she do? She called him live on the air!

http://www.bradblog.com/Audio/StephanieMiller_SockDeathThreat_103006.mp3

A copy of the uncensored letter:

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3693
http://ltradio.blogspot.com/2006/10/hate-filled-death-threat-letter-sent-to.html

And your point is???
 
And your point is???

Call me crazy, but it would seem that the point would be obvious to anyone not wearing a tin-foil hat--that being that there are more than a few strange rangers in the world who reside in places beyond where the buses run, and who, after returning home from places of marginal employment and/or stays in various correctional facilties or mental institutions, are fond of flipping on Fox, submitting to the nightly News Corp brainwashing, and think nothing of threatening the lives of anyone left of Boy George.
 
jimtalk said:
And your point is???

Call me crazy, but it would seem that the point would be obvious to anyone not wearing a tin-foil hat--that being that there are more than a few strange rangers in the world who reside in places beyond where the buses run, and who, after returning home from places of marginal employment and/or stays in various correctional facilties or mental institutions, are fond of flipping on Fox, submitting to the nightly News Corp brainwashing, and think nothing of threatening the lives of anyone left of Boy George.

your crazy.

all types of media gets these crazy threats.

Rush, O Reilly, hell even Letterman had a stalker.

The point here is how Miller reacted to it. Rush ignores the threats, he's gotten way too many of them at this point to even care. He self medicates.

BOR goes ballistic and calls his Fox News lawyers and law enforcement until they tell him 'it's gonna be okay, big guy'.

Stephanie calls the guy out live on her show. And she rips him a new one, too. That's pue comedy gold.

One thing about Miller, and you can say the same thing about Rosie O Odonnell, Wolf Blitzer, Dave Letterman, and many others. In the interview on Fox, she is asked point blank 'do you want America to win the war in Iraq'?. BOR asked Letterman this, and Lynne Cheney grilled blitzer with the same question. Anyone notice the strange reaction and answers to this question?
 
Evnlee,

I've programmed talk, seen and compared the tone of the mail, and if you don't think right-wing "hate" mail isn't in general angrier and more vociferous than what comes in from others, you haven't read much radio station mail.

I do agree that Stephanie handled her situation in spectacular fashion--she has great instincts, and to say she is talented is an understatement.

Oh, and just speaking for myself, I'm for the people of Iraq winning the war in Iraq.
 
jimtalk said:
Call me crazy, but it would seem that the point would be obvious to anyone not wearing a tin-foil hat--that being that there are more than a few strange rangers in the world who reside in places beyond where the buses run, and who, after returning home from places of marginal employment and/or stays in various correctional facilties or mental institutions, are fond of flipping on Fox, submitting to the nightly News Corp brainwashing, and think nothing of threatening the lives of anyone left of Boy George.

Thanks for playing. :D I figured someone would reply as you did. And predictably you have left out the obvious. This stuff happens all across the spectrum as pointed out by evnlee. The insinuation by you and the original poster that this kind of behavior is somehow characteristic of mainly conservative Fox viewers is just plain silly.
 
Well, Mr. Slate, some things we know for sure, and others are matters of pure speculation. Thanks to Fighting Irish and others we have documented, hat-in-hand proof of right-wing vitriol. So where is the similar material on the left that seems to have your panties in a bunch?
 
talkjim said:
Well, Mr. Slate, some things we know for sure, and others are matters of pure speculation. Thanks to Fighting Irish and others we have documented, hat-in-hand proof of right-wing vitriol. So where is the similar material on the left that seems to have your panties in a bunch?

there's scores of material on both sides, TJ. You don't think Savage got angry death letters for saying a gay man should just 'go die of aids', or Rush didn't get a bucketload after this MJFox impersonation? Please. Go do your own homework, son.

And I have questions about whether you truly want the 'people of Iraq' to win the war. That just another tap dance~why not just come out and say ' I want our military to win over there'? Why is that such a difficult question? Why do all these 'talk hosts' ( some of whom I like ) that demand straight answers dodge the question? Is it because they cant go on record saying 'well since the war was a mistake, I want the military to lose, like we did in Vietnam'? I guess we all pretty much know today how Mr Kerry feels about our servicemen and women ;)
 
"Please. Go do your own homework, son."

You make my argument for me Evn--since you can't defeat me on the basis of logic, I guess you need to resort to calling me "son". Since I'm well into middle-age, maybe I should take it as a compliment. But I can only wonder what's next--"Mr. Poopy-Pants" maybe? Typical right-wing malarky.

Anyway, I'll try to treat you with a bit more respect than you have shown me.

"And I have questions about whether you truly want the 'people of Iraq' to win the war. That just another tap dance~why not just come out and say ' I want our military to win over there'?"

Quite simply, because I DON'T want them to win the war--I want them to be called home, because it's a war that's unwinnable, and I don't want any more precious American life lost in a war that can't be won. Moreover, it's a war that has nothing to do with the war on terror, and it's a war that according to polls. up to 80 percent of Iraqis don't want us to fight.

And by the way, if it's such an important cause, why aren't you over there in uniform? Or are you another member of the Limbaugh-Hannity-Savage chickenhawk brigade?

P.S. If you have been posting from Iraq in between firefights, I withdraw my last question. Somehow though, I don't think so.
 
evnlee said:
there's scores of material on both sides, TJ. You don't think Savage got angry death letters for saying a gay man should just 'go die of aids', or Rush didn't get a bucketload after this MJFox impersonation? Please. Go do your own homework, son.

Telling someone else to do homework when you make an allegation and then don't bother to back it up yourself is richly ironic. If these hosts got death threats, show us the letters. We can read the one to Stephanie. So far, all we have from you is guesswork. Show us the evidence.
 
Phillip Dampier said:
evnlee said:
there's scores of material on both sides, TJ. You don't think Savage got angry death letters for saying a gay man should just 'go die of aids', or Rush didn't get a bucketload after this MJFox impersonation? Please. Go do your own homework, son.

Telling someone else to do homework when you make an allegation and then don't bother to back it up yourself is richly ironic. If these hosts got death threats, show us the letters. We can read the one to Stephanie. So far, all we have from you is guesswork. Show us the evidence.

Now, Phillip, you know that anyone who stakes a position on the air in a major market that is controversial get's death threats. They are well documented!

Hell, Stern, Imus, and even Paul ( yes I said that ) Harvey got death threats ( Paul's came after a controversial monologue where he claimed "Once upon a time, we elbowed our way onto and into this continent by giving small pox infected blankets to native Americans.Yes, that was biological warfare! And we used every other weapon we could get our hands on to grab this land from whomever. And we grew prosperous.)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/050705harvey.mp3

You guys ALWAYS ask for proof of the obvious ( media bias anyone? ) Then, when it's provided, you discount it. Time and again!


Ok, how about this: when the DaVinci Code broke, Neal Boortz went on the air, and said he enjoyed the book, and couldn't understand what the Catholics were so up in arms about. The DaVinci Code, for chrissakes! The FBI was called in to investigate death threats he received, and the local media was well aware of it.

""I've said this many times before ... so why not go ahead and say it again. In my 37 years of experience in doing talk radio shows there is nothing --- not one thing --- that I have seen or experienced that can compare to the viciousness of letters and emails that come from people who hold themselves up to be Christians when they think I've done something to question their religious beliefs. Death threats, nasty comments about my family, threats of hellfire and damnation --- it's all there in those emails I've received from these devout, and apparently very frightened, people.""

Neal Boortz: http://boortz.com/nuze/200605/05162006.html

Now, go ahead, and ignore the obvious. Anyone that stakes out a controversial opinion on the air can expect death threats. 8)
 
evnlee said:
Hell, Stern, Imus, and even Paul ( yes I said that ) Harvey got death threats ( Paul's came after a controversial monologue where he claimed "Once upon a time, we elbowed our way onto and into this continent by giving small pox infected blankets to native Americans.Yes, that was biological warfare! And we used every other weapon we could get our hands on to grab this land from whomever. And we grew prosperous.)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/050705harvey.mp3

You guys ALWAYS ask for proof of the obvious ( media bias anyone? ) Then, when it's provided, you discount it. Time and again!

What I find fascinating is that you visit sites like Alex Jones' Prison Planet, which is one of the ultimate conspiracy theory sites.

I'll bet you were one of those who thought jet airliners fired missles into the WTC and Pentagon, right? ;D
 
"nuff said"

Almost, but not quite, evn. Now that I have done you the courtesy of clarifying my position (at your request), why don't you clarify yours, by admitting that you are advocating the continuing death of American troops through your support of the failed fiasco in Iraq?
 
talkjim said:
"nuff said"

Almost, but not quite, evn. Now that I have done you the courtesy of clarifying my position (at your request), why don't you clarify yours, by admitting that you are advocating the continuing death of American troops through your support of the failed fiasco in Iraq?

My party ( libertarians ) already have an exit strategy : http://www.lp.org/exitplan.pdf

And, no, I did not support the Iraq war, but not because of some deep seated pathological hatred of all things Bush.

You want all the troops to return home immediately, and you've already admitted you want them to lose. Nuff said.

FI writes "What I find fascinating is that you visit sites like Alex Jones' Prison Planet, which is one of the ultimate conspiracy theory sites. "

I read Drudge AND HuffPo.I read Baloney's 'news' blog, and your 'news blog', too. I also read the loony sites ( like DU and Prison Planet ) because you 'keep your enemies closer'.
 
FightingIrish said:
evnlee said:
Hell, Stern, Imus, and even Paul ( yes I said that ) Harvey got death threats ( Paul's came after a controversial monologue where he claimed "Once upon a time, we elbowed our way onto and into this continent by giving small pox infected blankets to native Americans.Yes, that was biological warfare! And we used every other weapon we could get our hands on to grab this land from whomever. And we grew prosperous.)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/audio/050705harvey.mp3

You guys ALWAYS ask for proof of the obvious ( media bias anyone? ) Then, when it's provided, you discount it. Time and again!

What I find fascinating is that you visit sites like Alex Jones' Prison Planet, which is one of the ultimate conspiracy theory sites.

I'll bet you were one of those who thought jet airliners fired missles into the WTC and Pentagon, right? ;D

actually, the FBI investigated Alex Jones shortly after the threat against Paul Harvey.

No comment's on Boortz' threats? Does that qualify as 'proof'?

Again, you guys ask for the proof, I provide it, and then it's in the spin cycle. ::)
 
evnlee said:
You guys ALWAYS ask for proof of the obvious ( media bias anyone? ) Then, when it's provided, you discount it. Time and again!

I've noticed that about the libs on this board. It seems to be their way of discounting what they don't want to believe. And then they automatically discredit the source of any proof provided. Anyone who doesn't believe that these threats happen across all political persuasions is living in John Kerry land....I mean lala-land. :D
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom