RAD1 said:
OutOfTheBiz said:
Long gone are the days when programming actually focused on music quality, let on-air talent be personalities and not liner jocks and gave a damn about listener input. Doing music tests or using a research company out of the market to decide what to play and how to program a station is a huge disservice.
Ummm... music tests and market research IS listener input. Who do you think are the people in the focus groups and the music tests? They are P-1 and P-2 listeners of the station. What "listener input" do you think is better - the request lines?
You must be truly out of the biz....I'm not and talking to listeners daily on the phone and on site contradicts most everything music tests and research done out of the market provide!
You must have never worked for a station big enough to actually afford any market research then, or you would know that it's never "out of the market." The whole POINT is to research your own station's listeners.
You also obviously have no understanding of how to collect a sample that reflect your audience as a whole. These listeners you chat with on the phone - are they a correct demographic sample of your audience? Do you have enough to make a statistically valid sample within a correct margin of error? There's a cardinal rule of research: Garbage in, garbage out.
Now, of course, I realize there are many cases where cash-strapped companies (cough - Clear Channel - cough) may attempt to do a "national" music research project and plug it in to may different markets, but I'm not talking about that. Local research, conducted correctly, and used properly, is invaluable. Trying to do it any other way is a disaster waiting to happen.